For me, it may be that the toilet paper roll needs to have the open end away from the wall. I don’t want to reach under the roll to take a piece! That’s ludicrous!

That or my recent addiction to correcting people when they use “less” when they should use “fewer”

  • medgremlin@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    The medical symbol of the staff with the snake is only supposed to have 1 (one) snake on it. A staff with 1 snake is the Rod of Asclepius (the son of Apollo and Greek demigod of medicine), a staff with 2 snakes is a Caduceus which is carried by Hermes as a messenger or herald.

    Physicians get 1 snake. Couriers and heralds get 2 snakes. Any medical professional or organization that uses 2 snakes is wrong and needs to go study the humanities and classics for a bit.

  • PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Discord is not a good replacement for support forums. Discord isn’t searchable by search engines.

    Historically, if I had an issue with a product and I googled “[product] [issue]” I’d be met with a support forum post, with someone describing the same issue. I could read the thread to find how they resolved it. I don’t actually have to interact with the post at all, and I don’t need to ask the same question again. For most (decent) forums I don’t even need to make an account just to read the post.

    Discord throws that all out the window. Now I’m met with a “JoiN OUr dIScoRd SerVEr to GEt suPPorT” page. Nothing is searchable via a search engine. And Discord’s server searchability (even in the app) has always been, at best, absolute dogshit. You already need to know exactly which text thread things were posted in, (because you can’t search the entire server at once), and you need to know exactly what was said, (because there’s no fuzzed search terms).

    So 99% of the time, you just end up asking the same question that has already been asked a hundred times in the past, and now you need to wait for someone to respond. It also puts a lot more strain on the support staff, because they’re answering the same question a hundred times instead of just the once in a forum.

    And don’t come at me with the “but Discord recently added a support forum feature where people can start threads and save the conversation for later” bullshit. That’s a band-aid, at best. It still isn’t searchable via search engines, so it means the above issues with Discord’s search function still apply, and the forum function is essentially useless as support forums.

    Lastly, why the fuck should I be forced to join another server just to get support? What if I don’t have a discord account? What if I live in a region that Discord doesn’t support? What if I just plain don’t want to clog up my server sidebar with dozens of servers that I have only visited once? What if I just really hate the fact that your server has been configured to push notifications for every single message by default? What if I just fucking want to google my issue, and get an answer without any further effort?

      • PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        I’d argue that this is petty, because you’re still technically able to get support for your issue in the end. It just takes a lot more effort in everyone involved; More effort on your end to actually get support, and more effort on support staff because they have already answered your question a hundred times further up the thread.

  • Uncle_Abbie@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    I don’t care what Big Dictionary has to say about it, “literally” does NOT mean “figuratively.”

    If “literally” means “figuratively,” then we literally have no word for “literally.”

  • affiliate@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    a couple always means two.

    every time anyone says “a couple”, i ask them if they mean two. it’s not pleasant exchange for either of us, but it must be done

    • Eiri@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Disagree. I’ve always understood it to mean approximately two. Usually 2-3; 4 isn’t outlandish.

      Unless that’s the meaning, the expression doesn’t have a reason to exist. So that’s how I decide to interpret it.

      • SoGrumpy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Wrong. A couple is two exactly. After the wedding: Oh look at the happy couple. There aren’t 3 or 4 people standing there, 2 people are standing there. A couple.

        To couple train carriages together means to attach two carriages together. There are more carriages behind that one, but they were all individually coupled together.

        • Eiri@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Aw come on, those are two very different meanings of the word in my book. As it happens, the couple of eggs I took out of the fridge aren’t in a romantic relationship.

          • SoGrumpy@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            Look in any English language dictionary. Show me an entry that states a couple is more than two

            I‘ll wait.

            • Eiri@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              https://www.merriam-webster.com/grammar/couple-few-several-use

              Couple is used to refer to two things, but is also often used for a small number greater than two.

              by the 1500s, it was also being used in the phrase a couple of to refer to an indefinite but still small number of people or things

              Verdict: couple is used of small numbers most of the time, but usually at least two or more.

              So yeah, the meaning of “at least two but possibly a bit more than that” has been around for a loooooong time.

        • fross@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Starting a post with “Wrong.” and listing a few items that support your view is… Well it gives me Reddit energy, not a good thing. ;)

          Here are some counterexamples that negate it: “I’ll be ready in a couple of minutes”, “it’s a couple of miles away”.

          This does not always mean exactly two. I mean, if you just want to yell out “it always means exactly two!” Then that’s on you, but in the English language everyone else in the world uses, it often means two, but can also mean around but not exactly two, depending on the use case.

  • trijste@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    If you’ve ever had a cat sit in front of a toilet paper roll and spin it, you will appreciate having the open end toward the wall so it doesn’t fully unravel

  • Chainweasel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    If it were supposed to be pronounced “jif” it would have been spelled that way, I don’t give two fucks what Stephen Wilhite said about it either.

    • 1337@1337lemmy.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      but g followed by i or e very regularly makes a soft g in English (and always makes a soft g in Italian, which is irrelevant I guess but I speak both). you may as well purposely mispronounce giraffe, gelatin, germ, Giorgio, giant, gentle, etc while you’re at it since it they don’t start with a j.

      by english rules it very often is a soft g, but could be hard as well, but the creator has clarified multiple times it is meant to be soft, so why are people fighting it?

        • 1337@1337lemmy.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          pan / pang

          hat / hate

          clam / claim

          one letter can and often does completely change pronunciation. i’d give you a good ol’ fashion makin fun of, but i actually think you could’ve gotten there if you would’ve thought about for a few more seconds. you seem pretty smart. shame you clicked reply too soon.

            • 1337@1337lemmy.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              in terms of how people refer to it these days, you may be correct that slightly more are using the hard g. what drives me nuts about the argument though is that the ‘hard g’ crowd does not have a good argument for it. the “g stands for graphics so it should be a hard g” crowd are immediately proven wrong that that’s not how any acronyms work. the “gift” crowd are immediately proven wrong as i just did above.

              just be honest with yourselves. the only argument you have is “we just like it better”. if you were honest then i wouldn’t be able to argue against it.

              • AEsheron@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                3 months ago

                Gift is by far the most commonly used word that is comparable, and it is a very close comparison, it makes sense people would base it off that. I’m a soft g person myself, but the one letter change doesn’t hold up very well here. All your examples have an additional letter specifically to change how another letter is pronounced using well established rules. That is not the case here at all.

                • 1337@1337lemmy.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Pan/pang- the g has a well established rule to change the pronunciation of the a? No it doesn’t lol. Words are not comparable like that in english, this is another terrible argument.

                  Examples: lead and lead, read and read, tear and tear, bass and bass, wind and wind. Spelled the exact same way and different pronunciations. Trying to prove how gif is pronounced based on the word gift just proves you haven’t thought about this for more than 10 seconds.

                  There is no grammatical argument for hard g. There is also no grammatical argument for soft g. Once again, g followed by i or e can be either in English. The only thing that should sway this is what the creator intended and straight up told everybody many times.

  • Count Regal Inkwell@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    “Spectacle Fighter”.

    In the late aughts, game critic Ben “Yathzee” Croshaw came up with that term to describe games like Bayonetta and Devil May Cry, beat-em-up type games where the point is less “can you get through” and more “how high can you get that combo meter? How COOL can you make yourself look while beating up all these fodder enemies?”

    A few years later the industry coalesced on an agreed-upon term for this subgenre – And called it “Character Action”.

    Yathzee has just accepted defeat and uses the term everyone uses, he has to, he works in games media.

    I refuse. Character Action is a dumb, DUMB term because every action game is a character action game, because there is ACTION and CHARACTERS in all of them.

    Whereas “Spectacle Fighter” was perfectly descriptive of just WHAT made those games special. You are FIGHTING, and the objective is to LOOK SPECTACULAR.

    • FangedWyvern42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I haven’t heard that term before, but it’s way better than character action. Plus, it actually fits for games that use similar mechanics but are technically different genres, like ULTRAKILL.

  • FryHyde@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Crunchy peanut butter shouldn’t exist. It’s lazy, unfinished peanut butter. At the very least, it should cost less. Why are we paying the same price for a job half finished?

  • CascadianGiraffe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    There’s a Wikipedia link and a hundred others if you bother to search even a little.

    Besides, doesn’t matter if it’s real. It’s a story. It’s entertainment. And it’s just as real as any other opinion here.

  • Blaster M@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    The reason I won’t get a Tesla has nothing to do with Musk or the car’s sketchy reliability.

    It has everything to do with the simple fact that I don’t like having my basic instruments over in the center console instead of in front of me.

  • n3m37h@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Trucks should be used for working and not hauling groceries. Get a fucking car or a van. Roads are safer with more crash compatibe vehicles that also weigh less. Large trucks should need a special licence to drive/own Driving should also be taught in school

  • Onionguy@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    The toilet paper roll has to be placed so the tear off sheet faces the shitting person, and not the wall.

  • TeutonenThrasher@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    This thread has now accrued over 1100 comments in only 2 days. That makes it the most commented thread in Lemmy history, so far. How did this gain so much traction in such a short time?