For me, it may be that the toilet paper roll needs to have the open end away from the wall. I don’t want to reach under the roll to take a piece! That’s ludicrous!

That or my recent addiction to correcting people when they use “less” when they should use “fewer”

  • PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Discord is not a good replacement for support forums. Discord isn’t searchable by search engines.

    Historically, if I had an issue with a product and I googled “[product] [issue]” I’d be met with a support forum post, with someone describing the same issue. I could read the thread to find how they resolved it. I don’t actually have to interact with the post at all, and I don’t need to ask the same question again. For most (decent) forums I don’t even need to make an account just to read the post.

    Discord throws that all out the window. Now I’m met with a “JoiN OUr dIScoRd SerVEr to GEt suPPorT” page. Nothing is searchable via a search engine. And Discord’s server searchability (even in the app) has always been, at best, absolute dogshit. You already need to know exactly which text thread things were posted in, (because you can’t search the entire server at once), and you need to know exactly what was said, (because there’s no fuzzed search terms).

    So 99% of the time, you just end up asking the same question that has already been asked a hundred times in the past, and now you need to wait for someone to respond. It also puts a lot more strain on the support staff, because they’re answering the same question a hundred times instead of just the once in a forum.

    And don’t come at me with the “but Discord recently added a support forum feature where people can start threads and save the conversation for later” bullshit. That’s a band-aid, at best. It still isn’t searchable via search engines, so it means the above issues with Discord’s search function still apply, and the forum function is essentially useless as support forums.

    Lastly, why the fuck should I be forced to join another server just to get support? What if I don’t have a discord account? What if I live in a region that Discord doesn’t support? What if I just plain don’t want to clog up my server sidebar with dozens of servers that I have only visited once? What if I just really hate the fact that your server has been configured to push notifications for every single message by default? What if I just fucking want to google my issue, and get an answer without any further effort?

    • BaumGeist@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      And that’s assuming they even have a support staff. Most of the time I see this bullshit, it’s small dev teams maintaining niche software with less than the bare minimum of documentation.

      The only problem I have with your stance is that it’s not petty, pointless nor pedantic. It’s a plague on the world of software. Discord is terrible for the use-case it’s intended for (group chats), why the fuck are people using it for their community forums???

      • PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        I’d argue that this is petty, because you’re still technically able to get support for your issue in the end. It just takes a lot more effort in everyone involved; More effort on your end to actually get support, and more effort on support staff because they have already answered your question a hundred times further up the thread.

  • Chainweasel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 months ago

    If it were supposed to be pronounced “jif” it would have been spelled that way, I don’t give two fucks what Stephen Wilhite said about it either.

      • atocci@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        But why? We don’t pronounce any other acronyms like that, so why treat GIF different? The U in SCUBA isn’t pronounced like it is in Underwater. The first A in CAPTCHA isn’t pronounced the same as in Automated and the CH isn’t split up to be pronounced like Computer and Human. The second A in NASA isn’t pronounced like in Administration and the I in PIN doesn’t get pronounced like Identification.

        We read acronyms as their own words, not as a collection of the first sounds of each constituent word.

        • SLVRDRGN@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Tbf, you’re pointing out the vowels which make the sounds needed to pronounce the acronym as a word. But I get it, either way, we’re pronouncing the word as a standalone word.

        • slouching_employer@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          🤷 just cause?

          Also, “gift”

          Have any examples where the first letter of the acronym isn’t pronounced the same? (I’m sure there are some)

          • jaycifer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            UFO, not that that’s a super relevant question if we’re already admitting that our opinions are “just cause.” I think at that point the better question is “if just cause, why is there such a split in opinions?”

            I think the reason GIF is so contentious is that if we can there’s a tendency to make acronyms sound like words if possible. FUBAR and SCUBA are pronounced the way they are because we’re trained from words like tuba to see the UBA and use a long U. Something like “oofo” (or “uh-fo” as you would likely argue) for UFO sounds like half a word, hence pronouncing the letters individually. The thing about GIF is that both pronunciations sound like a word, and so both feel valid enough that there can be a split in opinions. Any arguments one way or the other is just trying to justify a gut feeling about which way is “proper.”

            • ObjectivityIncarnate@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              To be fair, UFO is an initialism, not an acronym. But at the same time, if it was, I think it’d still be an example, because we’d likely pronounce the U like “oo” (as in “boo”), lol

    • ISOmorph@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Same with Gnome wanting to be pronounced “Gah-nome”, or Latex “Latech”. Just spell stuff the way you want it to be pronounced, or accept that people pronounce it another way

      • ForgotAboutDre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Gnome is spelt the way they want it to be said. Are you suggesting that gnome should be pronounced ‘nome’ like the garden ornament with a silent g.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        or Latex “Latech”. Just spell stuff the way you want it to be pronounced

        But they did! You’re the one who fucked it up by using an “x” (Latin letter x) instead of a “χ” (Greek letter chi).

        (Also, you didn’t capitalize or format it correctly. It’s supposed to be rendered as “LAΤΕΧ”, and yes, those last three letters are Τ Ε Χ Greek capital tau, epsilon, chi.)

        🤓

      • BallsandBayonets@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        English being a bad language doesn’t excuse incorrect pronunciations. And if your argument was to hold any water, it’d be pronounced jraphics.

    • paddirn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Also .JIF is already a file format and as far as I know, it’s pronounced, “jif” just like it looks. So if “gif” and “jif” are supposed to be pronounced the same way, then why do we even have the letter J? Fuck the letter C too while we’re at it, get a unique sound, you bastard letter.

      https://fileinfo.com/extension/jiff

      • NotNotMike@programming.devOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Oh wow that’s actually a really good point!

        Now prepare for it to be dismissed! People are too dug in at this point, there’s no going back. The trenches have been dug.

    • 1337@1337lemmy.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      but g followed by i or e very regularly makes a soft g in English (and always makes a soft g in Italian, which is irrelevant I guess but I speak both). you may as well purposely mispronounce giraffe, gelatin, germ, Giorgio, giant, gentle, etc while you’re at it since it they don’t start with a j.

      by english rules it very often is a soft g, but could be hard as well, but the creator has clarified multiple times it is meant to be soft, so why are people fighting it?

        • 1337@1337lemmy.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          pan / pang

          hat / hate

          clam / claim

          one letter can and often does completely change pronunciation. i’d give you a good ol’ fashion makin fun of, but i actually think you could’ve gotten there if you would’ve thought about for a few more seconds. you seem pretty smart. shame you clicked reply too soon.

            • 1337@1337lemmy.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              in terms of how people refer to it these days, you may be correct that slightly more are using the hard g. what drives me nuts about the argument though is that the ‘hard g’ crowd does not have a good argument for it. the “g stands for graphics so it should be a hard g” crowd are immediately proven wrong that that’s not how any acronyms work. the “gift” crowd are immediately proven wrong as i just did above.

              just be honest with yourselves. the only argument you have is “we just like it better”. if you were honest then i wouldn’t be able to argue against it.

              • AEsheron@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                8 months ago

                Gift is by far the most commonly used word that is comparable, and it is a very close comparison, it makes sense people would base it off that. I’m a soft g person myself, but the one letter change doesn’t hold up very well here. All your examples have an additional letter specifically to change how another letter is pronounced using well established rules. That is not the case here at all.

                • 1337@1337lemmy.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  Pan/pang- the g has a well established rule to change the pronunciation of the a? No it doesn’t lol. Words are not comparable like that in english, this is another terrible argument.

                  Examples: lead and lead, read and read, tear and tear, bass and bass, wind and wind. Spelled the exact same way and different pronunciations. Trying to prove how gif is pronounced based on the word gift just proves you haven’t thought about this for more than 10 seconds.

                  There is no grammatical argument for hard g. There is also no grammatical argument for soft g. Once again, g followed by i or e can be either in English. The only thing that should sway this is what the creator intended and straight up told everybody many times.

    • Chaos0f7ife@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      I agree with this statement, but I never notice its wrong until someone points it out. Then my inner grammar teacher has an aneurysm and I go off on a tangent.

      It’s so close to being right that you don’t think about it, until you do. Then OCD sets in.

  • verity_kindle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    “white chocolate” doesn’t exist. It’s just sugar and a little bit of cocoa butter. It’s edible wax. It’s not chocolate and it doesn’t belong in any assortment of sweets, ever. Cocoa butter is skin moisturizer and that’s it.

    • Smoogs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      It does exist in the way that chocolate ‘solids’ exist as an element of chocolate. A typical chocolate bar consists of both chocolate solids and cocoa butter. It’s still an element of what you’re eating,

      So just cuz you eat ‘chocolate’ because you think you only favor the solids, you’re still eating the butter too in what makes chocolate. It’s like drinking milk products and then getting pedantic over people who use butter as a food even though milk contains some the same elements.

      But again this is about stupid hills to die on. And you picked an intolerant and ignorant stance so I guess you technically win in this particular topic.

        • satanmat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Wikipedia says. ʒI: where “ʒ” is the S in pleasure or the g in beige

          Which is to say (smoking my pipe like oxford don) I was making a scatological joke.

          Shitter

          • Maeve@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            That’s fine, it’s just hard to know without hearing native speakers’ pronunciations and you’ve only read it. Thanks for the reply!

    • Chaos0f7ife@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      I’ve never actually heard anyone call it X before, unless they were making a joke about the whole thing. Everybody I know still calls it Twitter. Calling it X is just embarrassing.

  • medgremlin@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    The medical symbol of the staff with the snake is only supposed to have 1 (one) snake on it. A staff with 1 snake is the Rod of Asclepius (the son of Apollo and Greek demigod of medicine), a staff with 2 snakes is a Caduceus which is carried by Hermes as a messenger or herald.

    Physicians get 1 snake. Couriers and heralds get 2 snakes. Any medical professional or organization that uses 2 snakes is wrong and needs to go study the humanities and classics for a bit.

    • deo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Would two snakes on an ambulance be acceptable? They’re kind of like couriers of the sick and injured.

      • medgremlin@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        That’s the only time I think it’s acceptable. Ambulances are kind of a venn diagram of healthcare and couriers, so the 2 snakes on the star of life makes sense.

  • Uncle_Abbie@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    I don’t care what Big Dictionary has to say about it, “literally” does NOT mean “figuratively.”

    If “literally” means “figuratively,” then we literally have no word for “literally.”

  • affiliate@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    a couple always means two.

    every time anyone says “a couple”, i ask them if they mean two. it’s not pleasant exchange for either of us, but it must be done

    • Eiri@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      Disagree. I’ve always understood it to mean approximately two. Usually 2-3; 4 isn’t outlandish.

      Unless that’s the meaning, the expression doesn’t have a reason to exist. So that’s how I decide to interpret it.

      • SoGrumpy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        Wrong. A couple is two exactly. After the wedding: Oh look at the happy couple. There aren’t 3 or 4 people standing there, 2 people are standing there. A couple.

        To couple train carriages together means to attach two carriages together. There are more carriages behind that one, but they were all individually coupled together.

        • Eiri@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Aw come on, those are two very different meanings of the word in my book. As it happens, the couple of eggs I took out of the fridge aren’t in a romantic relationship.

          • SoGrumpy@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            Look in any English language dictionary. Show me an entry that states a couple is more than two

            I‘ll wait.

            • Eiri@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              https://www.merriam-webster.com/grammar/couple-few-several-use

              Couple is used to refer to two things, but is also often used for a small number greater than two.

              by the 1500s, it was also being used in the phrase a couple of to refer to an indefinite but still small number of people or things

              Verdict: couple is used of small numbers most of the time, but usually at least two or more.

              So yeah, the meaning of “at least two but possibly a bit more than that” has been around for a loooooong time.

        • fross@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          Starting a post with “Wrong.” and listing a few items that support your view is… Well it gives me Reddit energy, not a good thing. ;)

          Here are some counterexamples that negate it: “I’ll be ready in a couple of minutes”, “it’s a couple of miles away”.

          This does not always mean exactly two. I mean, if you just want to yell out “it always means exactly two!” Then that’s on you, but in the English language everyone else in the world uses, it often means two, but can also mean around but not exactly two, depending on the use case.

  • Chaos0f7ife@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    The most pointless hill I will die on is the whole regardless, irregardless thing.

    They mean the same thing, but irregardless is redundant. My friend uses that word purely because he knows it pisses me off.

    • NotNotMike@programming.devOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      I can only assume your friend is the one who downvoted you

      Also, I say “irregardless” when I want to sound like the mobster from It’s Always Sunny in Philidelphia

  • DLSantini@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    To streamers, YouTubers, etc. Your Patreon supporters are called Patrons. Not fucking “Patreons.”

  • n3m37h@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Trucks should be used for working and not hauling groceries. Get a fucking car or a van. Roads are safer with more crash compatibe vehicles that also weigh less. Large trucks should need a special licence to drive/own Driving should also be taught in school

  • Onionguy@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    The toilet paper roll has to be placed so the tear off sheet faces the shitting person, and not the wall.

    • Chaos0f7ife@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Same. Don’t get me wrong, short form content is okay (I prefer long form). But the shit you see on Tick Tock and YouTube Shorts is so ridiculous that I can’t help but reactively close the app out of self preservation…

      It all started when someone wanted to fry chicken in Pepto-Bismol…