• kescusay@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    167
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Holy shit, he actually said that.

    This, right here, is a prime example of a political headline that looks like it comes from The Onion.

  • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    94
    ·
    7 months ago

    Cop literally wants a convicted felon to run the country, I can’t come up with a better satire for how little police care about rule of law… Or a better argument for the “Ban the Box” initiative

    I’m definitely all for loosening restrictions on former felons… Look bro, if we can have a convicted felon running for office, no reason why they can’t vote or hold jobs if they’ve done their time right?

  • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    72
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Does he care about people not caring about the rule of law?

    Or is he just upset he cant run his little fiefdom like a tyrant like cops would have been able to 30 years ago before cameras and youtube?

  • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    71
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    On the surface of only the quote. I agree.

    If a felon was in the White House, I think we’d finally see some genuine prison reform, and if we’re lucky, for profit prisons being outlawed.

    Can you imagine a Danny Trejo type in the White House? Someone who deeply cares that prison is reformative and not punishment?

    But not Donny Felon. He’s just going to commit more crimes.

    • linearchaos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 months ago

      God I would vote for Trejo. I’m not sure it would work well in the end. I’m not sure he could manage to do the proper negotiations to get anything useful done. But it would be one hell of a statement.

      • Crashumbc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Considering roughly half of Congress currently is strongly AGAINST getting anything done, much useful. Their entire plan is to stop everything and blame the other side.

        The worst part is it’s working :(

  • enbyecho@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    66
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    So basically he’s saying he has no faith or confidence in the criminal justice system? Wouldn’t that kind of… I dunno… disqualify you from a job in the criminal justice system?

    • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      I’ve think a lot of cops express how unhappy they are with the justice systems. Imagine getting a call for a domestic abuse. Show up and see this piece of shit beat his wife and kid. You arrest them and put them in jail. 6 months later you get another call same fucking guy same fucking thing. The courts gave him a reduced sentence. Rinse and repeat for your career. You’re catching the same dirt bags over and over and the justice system keeps putting them back out there cause they either are too lenient or under funded to handle them. Cops can make the arrest but have no control over the justice system. I get a lot of us hate cops but I think we can all empathize how hard it would be to see the same people every couple months victimizing the same people

      • Alexstarfire@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Or we could try a system that actually tried to rehabilitate people. Nah, that’s too much work. Best just keep people in jail.

        • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          7 months ago

          Many don’t want to change. They know what they know and lifestyle is set in. Like asking if you can be rehabilitated to be a trump supporter. Some thing’s are just in you and will never change

          • Bahalex@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            Many may be victims of a legal system that incentivizes recidivism and bullshit laws.

            For profit prisons need bodies to get federal cash, plus the cash from the underpaid labor the prisoners provide.

            I’m sure it would cost the government less to implement social programs that help nurture and support everyone than to continue to subsidize and pay private prisons.

            I have no proof of anything. But saying most don’t want to change seems hyperbolic and dog whistle-y.

            A very small minority are probably wired wrong and are indeed unchanging in their ways, I’d say the vast majority were set up to fail for profit.

          • John_McMurray@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            Ykniw there’s a very large anti cop contingent on the Trump side. Do you really think the Jan 6 types are really into law n order? You think most rednecks like cops? It’s suburban play acting rednecks that are into thin blue line horseshit.

  • ceenote@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    One more for the “Evidence ‘law and order Republicans’ are just racist” drawer.

  • MissJinx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    7 months ago

    Not american but I’m honestly worried about the USA right now. This shit is crazy. Can you imagine if he wins again?!

    • alsimoneau@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      The only way he doesn’t eventually is if he dies, and he’ll have shown them that they don’t have to wear masks anymore and can go as hard as they want.

        • zewm@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          7 months ago

          I’m not a trump supporter, kid. I’m simply stating the obvious. It’s going to happen.

          • Crashumbc@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            It is unfortunately a very real possibility at this time.

            And judging by the downvotes you’re getting, there are way too many people ignoring reality. Got their heads stuck in the sand, like that’s going to help.

    • Risus_Nex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      41
      ·
      7 months ago

      I know he would do a crazy amount of damage to the USA and the rest of the world. But at this point I think it would be best to just be done with it. Let him havoc for 4 years and then he’s out of the game and maybe the US can start to heal the rift in their society. If he doesn’t make it, his disciples will rage on and radicalize even further.

        • Holzkohlen@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          7 months ago

          Also Ukraine gets fucked, Taiwan invaded of Day 1 of the 2nd Trump presidency with Trump simping for both Putin and Xi Jinping.

      • fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        7 months ago

        Dude it’s not like covid or something you can just “get it over with”.

        If Trump were elected he works remain president until he died.

        The damage he works do during that time is not “healable”.

      • enbyecho@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        Let him havoc for 4 years and then he’s out of the game and maybe the US can start to heal the rift in their society.

        I’m sure basically a good person, so please take this in the spirit it was intended:

        Fuck you.

      • bradorsomething@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        It would definitely speed the decline of american influence in the world. I dare guess that if trump wins and continues his previous course of action, the US would lose its military bases in Europe by 2075, and be definitively beaten in a war (likely by China) by 2150.

        • PaleRider@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          I think you’re a little optimistic on the time line there.

          I’d give it Ten years tops…

          • MissJinx@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            The us is already against the world whent it comes do Israel if trump decides to support russia I think the rift with europe will be ultimate

  • MrJameGumb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    7 months ago

    Translation: “I’m upset that my cult leader was found guilty so I’m going to stand here and throw a sarcastic little crybaby tantrum about it now”

  • taiyang@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    7 months ago

    Oh yeah, I remember hearing about this as a local-ish. He’s bum hurt about criminal justice reform in Cali (non violent offenders getting less or no jail time, that kinda thing). Makes this job “harder” he says.

    It hasn’t been smooth sailing, mind you-- but it’s at least the government trying to do something about an overcrowded prison system.

    • Crikeste@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Makes his job harder? GOOD. Policing communities should never be an easy job. And you signed up for it, numb nuts.

      • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        It makes me wonder honestly if cops were always this corrupt, or if they’ve become more corrupt over time. I’d believe either being the case honestly, but maybe the former is a perception borne from all the pro police media there were in the 90s, 00s, and 10s. Hell, even today.

        • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          I’ve heard from people that were cops back in the 60s and 70s that after the 1982 decision in Harlow v Fitzgerald gave cops Qualified Immunity, illegally by the way, that was when the War on Cops propaganda started, and when they stopped living in the communities they were patrolling. I take it with a grain of salt since they were cops during the Civil Rights movement, and they didn’t quit, and because none of them realize that QI is illegal.

    • TurtleJoe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      The article says his department’s budget has increased by $270 million since newsom took office. Poor guy is underfunded!

    • Avatar_of_Self@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      On the flip side, you don’t have people spending close to a decade in prison awaiting trial, where the prosecution is hoping they are so tired of it, they will offer a crappy plea deal for time served, even if they have no case.

  • PlantDadManGuy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    7 months ago

    Has it ever been more painfully obvious that a police scumbag is bought and paid for by corrupt campaign funding?

  • Docandersonn@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    7 months ago

    Something really strange about American police forces is their use of military rank insignia. Here we have an elected official overseeing a civilian law enforcement agency of ~4000 personnel wearing the rank insignia of a 4-Star general.

    • ramble81@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      I under what you’re getting at, but how else would you propose defining delineations of authority within an organization like that? Corporate titles can be capricious and I’d almost fear a corporate based security force more!

      • Docandersonn@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        In this sheriff’s office, like several other law enforcement agencies, ranks jump from junior officers (lieutenant, captain) straight to flag rank (1 star for chief deputy, 2 stars for assistant sheriff, 3 stars for under sheriff, 4 stars for sheriff). Just seems like someone really wanted to dress up in a general’s uniform.

  • sucricdrawkcab@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    7 months ago

    “Bianco also challenged the idea of systemic racism or bias in law enforcement”

    Yes, because no police department ever has had these kinda problems in the United States.

  • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Look, I’m all for equal representation and equal opportunity for everyone. The US had a black president already, which is awesome, but I’m not thinking the next step here is to “recently convicted felon”. Maybe try for a woman as president first?

    Just saying.

    • ameancow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      There’s a whole long LIST of things we can try long before settling on “first felon president.”

      • First Woman President

      • First Openly Gay President

      • First Asian/Pacific Islander President

      • First Albino President

      • First Teenage President

      • First Werewolf President

      • First Teenage Werewolf President

      • First Robot President

      • First Robot Teenage Werewolf President

      • First Normal President

      We could go on and on too.

    • John_McMurray@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      7 months ago

      Yknow there’s a strong argument to be made had Hillary won, she would have been circumventing the 2 term rule

      • thatgirlwasfire@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        Under the same logic, wouldn’t Biden also be ineligible because he was also in the white house (as vp) for 8 years?

        • John_McMurray@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          Oh cmon. If Bill hadn’t married her, he’d be a retired lawyer in Little Rock today. Any other first ladies end up Secretary of State in another administration a decade later?

          • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            Is there more to the argument because it looks like you’re kinda jumping from “she became secretary of state” to “she would’ve been 3 term”. She was qualified to be president despite Bill.