• 0 Posts
  • 22 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 10th, 2023

help-circle


  • Yes, one can argue that more fossil energy could have been shut down if the nuclear plants had continued operating.

    That said, Nuclear was replaced by renewables. Coal was also replaced by renewables.
    Maybe more coal could have been replaced but claiming that nuclear was replaced with coal is a rhetoric trick but it is literally not true.

    Also these assumptions about replacing coal always seem to come from people who have no idea about the power of the German coal lobby.
    Coal is just about the only natural resource Germany has and is a massive industry.
    The coal exit movement is decades old as well. But as the graphs show it is also glacially slow due to massive lobbying.


  • You original comment was that someone “turned on coal/oil…”
    That statement is factually and demonstrably incorrect.
    Gas was not even part of that original claim but whatever.

    Building capacity as a reserve for peak times is not the same as the plants actually running and producing emissions.
    As the graphs show, the actual production and therefore emissions from fossil sources have gone down. This is what matters in he climate change debate.
    The mere existence of buildings has little to do with the topic at hand.











  • A country […] under a revolutionary socialist government is still communist

    I would argue that in a world where the terms are not synonymous, socialist countries are in fact socialist, not communist.

    at least in so far as its following the roadmap

    Following a roadmap to some target literally means that you have not yet achieved that target.
    The argument is not that their are no communists, the argument is that they have not established actual communism, therefore the states they govern are not communist states.
    Whether or not they want to establish communism does not factor into it.

    To claim otherwise would be akin to claiming that a company on a roadmap to profitability is already profitable, while actually still losing money.



  • You’re not going to break the Cuban blockade. You’re not going to settle the endless territorial disputes plaguing Vietnam. You’re not going to undo the legacy of generations of apartheid in South Africa overnight. You’re not going to Make the USSR Great Again.

    So maybe save yourself some angst and stop trying to tell Nicholas Maduro and Kim Jung Un how to do their jobs

    All these "you"s make me think that you might addressing me personally.
    I make no claim to solve anything, nor how anyone should do their job.
    I have provided an (incomplete) explanation as to what communism is, why it does not actually exist in practice and why therefore people commenting cannot be from a communist state.


  • every “communist” when pushed will take position on atrocities committed by various communists regimes… they gonna do that thing that “fascists” do: “well he really did not do it but if he did, they clearly deserved it”

    I have never encountered that argument. Is that something Tankies say?
    What I have seen is the often mocked argument, that these regimes were not communist in the first place.
    Actual communism has never existed and probably never will.
    There are however plenty of communists that will openly denounce stalinism. That is the entire premise of Animal Farm, btw.