On accident

I kind of can’t take people seriously when they say On accident, I don’t know or care if its more or less grammatical, it sounds like a child sputtering in my mind. It should be By accident or accidentally

Tummy

Any adult has zero business saying this lol

  • BodePlotHole@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Excusing folks with dyscalculia, those of you who speak proudly and openly about how bad you are at math can die in a fire.

    Functioning adults are expected to read. You should also be able to calculate reasonable numbers and percentages without needing the calculator on your phone to know what 20% is; Or what one half of 3/8 is.

    • fitjazz@lemmyf.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      If someone is speaking proudly of how bad they are at math they most likely didn’t have dyscalculia. Most of us that do have it speak angrily or resignedly about how bad we are at math. What really gets me is when people proudly blame their “dyslexia” for why they are bad at math.

    • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      So, the way you have phrased this is blatantly ableist. It’s like you’re saying you hate people who are blind because they refuse to learn to read. You’re annoyed with people who CHOOSE not to learn, and attacking other people who have a disability. Don’t use the technical terms for actual disabilities when that’s not what you are talking about. Your friend isn’t “OCD” because they like when things match.

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Unless you have a health condition that causes it, morbid obesity is gross. I don’t mean being fat. I’m talking the mom in What’s Eating Gilbert Grape. Also, you shouldn’t need a rascal scooter to shop in Wal-Mart unless you have such a health condition.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      The worst part is understanding the medical definition of morbid obesity. Those of us you’re excusing as “just fat” also clear that bar

  • IronKrill@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    They’re called Lego pieces or just “Lego”, not “Legos”. It is the official way to say it, but more importantly I got used to it while growing up. I would always say “Lego ___”, for instance Lego sets, Lego bricks, Lego pieces: “Pass me the Lego brick.” The only time I would say “Lego” is as a group: “Bring the Lego upstairs.” Everytime I hear “Legos” my eye twitches because it sounds so wrong. Not sure where I picked this up but I will die on this hill.

    • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      That’s the official recommendation from LEGO as well. I found a piece of paper that mentions this in the box of one of my dad’s old LEGO sets.

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    One more: Conservatives are mostly less likely to have a higher education, less likely to be financially successful, more likely to be racist, more likely to lack critical thinking skills, less emotionally developed. And then there are the highly educated and rich hate mongers who stir up the rest for their own gains.

  • Vanth@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 months ago

    People that say “ex cetera” instead of “et cetera” should be taken at their word.

  • thomasloven@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    Difference in temperature cannot be expressed in °C. It’s not 5 °C warmer today than yesterday. It’s 5 K warmer. You can say “five degrees warmer”, but not “five degrees Celsius warmer” or “five Celsius warmer”. “Five Celsius degrees warmer” is also correct, but who’d do that?

    The reason is that the Celsius scale has a fixed offset. If your birthday is in a week, you wouldn’t say it’s “one seventh of January from today”.

    • myliltoehurts@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      5 months ago

      I was not aware of this before and this is probably one of the most pedantic things I’ve heard for a while - great answer.

    • boyi@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 months ago

      The reason is that the Celsius scale has a fixed offset.

      Can you explain more on this? I still don’t get it.

      As of now, although I am not a man of authority on this subject, I still think temperature difference can be expressed by using celcius simply because the celcius has the same equivalent difference as Kelvin. The difference of the two value of the same unit will still be the same unit.

      First, from here

      Since the standardization of the kelvin in the International System of Units, it has subsequently been redefined in terms of the equivalent fixing points on the Kelvin scale, so that a temperature increment of one degree Celsius is the same as an increment of one kelvin, though numerically the scales differ by an exact offset of 273.15.

      Secondly from here

      The degree Celsius (symbol: °C) can refer to a specific point on the Celsius temperature scale or to a difference or range between two temperatures.

  • Resol van Lemmy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 months ago

    I always hated how most people don’t pronounce the first R in “February”. It just sounded kinda weird to me.

  • Delphia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Socks and slides is only acceptable footwear for taking the bin to the kerb or checking the mailbox. If you’re wearing them in public I immediately assume you are a classless dumbass and your opinion on anything is irrelevant.

  • Jackthelad@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    People using “was” when they mean “were”.

    And the classic “should of/could of”.

  • Lvxferre@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    More like pet peeves, and not something I’d lose my sleep over, but they’re hilariously pedantic. I’ll focus on Latin because I’d rather not pick on existing linguistic communities.

    ⟨V⟩ and ⟨U⟩ are not different letters in Latin. Deal with it. The “right” way to use them is like this:

    • Upper case - ⟨V⟩, always
    • Lower case - ⟨u⟩ or ⟨v⟩, pick one, but don’t mix them

    People fāiling to follow the əbove ɑre æs ənnoying æs someone insistently respelling English ⟨A⟩ with rændom junk bāsed on the sound. Like I æm doing now.

    Same deal with ⟨I⟩ vs. ⟨J⟩. J’m not gojng to stop you from dojng so, but you can almost hear my “tsk, tsk, tsk” from a djstance.

    There’s one way to pronounce Latin ⟨C⟩. It’s /k/ (as in “skill”). If you use /tʃ/ (as in “chimp”), /ʃ/ (as in “shampoo”), /ts/ (as in “cats”), /s/ (as in “silly”), you’re doing it wrong. Unless you’re handling Late Latin, but then follow some consistent set of rules dammit, not just “I use Latin like the Church does”.

    “Veni, uidi, uici” is supposed to be pronounced ['we:ni: 'wi:di: wi:ki:]; or roughly “WAY-nee WEE-dee WEE-kee”. Once you pronounce it with random stuff like “vany VD vaitchy”, you’re wrecking all its alliterative appeal.

    Speaking on that, Brutus is an unsung hero for going all stab-stabby against the guy who said the above. A shame that nobody did it against his adoptive child.

  • toomanypancakes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    5 months ago

    I think it’s mostly that particularly poor common grammar drives me nuts. Like, there’s no excuse to not know the difference between you’re and your. Once could be a mistake or a typo, but if it’s a pattern of behavior you’re just not trying. Get your shit together. :)

    • meleethecat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      I definitely judge people on grammar and spelling. If you can’t be bothered to learn your native language, then I can’t be bothered to decode your shitty writing.

    • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      I’m a stickler for grammar and speech as well. It’s classist, I know. But even as a little kid, I picked up on terminology that other kids used that in retrospect reflected poverty (mee-maw, pop-pop, commode (for toilet), yeller (instead of yellow)). At the time, I couldn’t explain why I disliked it, but I considered it deficient. I’ve come a long way in dismissing those views by myself, but I can’t not notice.

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        “Commode” is one of those? Huh. I don’t think I’ve ever heard a person use that word (I’ve only seen it in writing)

  • Hemingways_Shotgun@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 months ago

    Ha! How much time have you got?

    Shallow and pedantic is my speciality.

    But for the sake of brevity I’ll simply say that hearing (or reading) less in cases where fewer would be more appropriate is like driving an ice pick into my brain.

    Yes…both are technically correct, but I have to fight the urge to be that guy whenever I hear it.

    • sexual_tomato@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      They’re not interchangeable. ‘Fewer’ is for countable nouns and ‘less’ is for aggregate nouns, just like ‘how many’ and ‘how much’.

      E.g:

      Aggregate:

      “How much sand? Less sand.”

      Countable:

      “How many grains of sand? Fewer grains of sand.”

      • Hemingways_Shotgun@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        Oh believe me, I know. I agree.

        but the argument nowadays is that common usage dictates that both are now “acceptable”, similar to how apparently “literally” now effectively means “figuratively” because everyone uses it.

      • boatswain@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        Along with that, I’ll add in “number” vs “amount”:

        • A shocking number of people get this wrong (countable)
        • The amount of confusion about it is distressing (aggregate)
    • Boozilla@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      My stupid mental trick for keeping these straight: fewer potatoes means less mashed potatoes.