If you have investments, let’s treat those as liquid cash for the sake of argument. Otherwise, the assumption is that you’re not selling property or possessions, but continuing to live as you do now.

  • Opinionhaver@feddit.ukOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 months ago

    I just ran the numbers for the first time ever, and it adds up to 34 months - which I realize is a pretty privileged place to be. However, I’m by no means rich; I just live well below my means and invest all my savings.

      • Opinionhaver@feddit.ukOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        Depends on who I compare myself to and how one defines “rich.” To me, it means someone whose passive income exceeds their spending - and I’m nowhere even close to that… yet.

        • TheOneCurly@feddit.online
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          Yeah I think that’s where the distinction between rich and wealthy comes in. You still have to work for a living and are closer to homelessness than renting out Venice for a wedding (for instance).

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          This exact question from this thread is how rich are you and 34 months is quite wealthy.

          It’s an important distinction where I’m a potential counter example. I admit it. I earn what ought to be a comfortable living but poor choices in the past (and probably still) mean that I’m only a couple months from financial disaster. And since it would affect my kids education and my old age, the affects would be major. I am clearly not wealthy, mostly due to my own choices

          • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Surely it depends how you live though. A guy spending just £15 a week on food and living in a tent is not wealthy just because they have £2k in the bank which will cover them for a few years.

      • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I used to rent a single bedroom in an overcrowded house share, didn’t learn to drive because I couldn’t afford it.

        Had over a year of expenses saved, hardly makes you rich.

      • bluGill@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Nearly everybody who speaks English is rich. We just have no clue who poor other parts of the world are and so think of ourselves as poor.

      • Opinionhaver@feddit.ukOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        I don’t. I do it the boring way - buying cheap, highly diversified ETF index funds.

          • Toaster@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago
            1. Open a Vanguard account.
            2. Buy as much of the thing called VOO as you can each month.
            3. Come back at retirement age to oodles of money.
          • TheOneCurly@feddit.online
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Mutual funds and ETFs are both types of investments that represent a group of individual stocks and are generally managed in some way, either by a person or by a fixed algorithm. Mutual funds have some tax implications that can by annoying for people so ETFs tend to be preferred for taxable accounts (in the US at least).

    • null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’m in my mid 40’s.

      It’s not particularly uncommon for people in regional Australia to own their own house with no mortgage by my age.

      It’s pretty tough to find a family home that costs less than 10x average wage.

      So, as a kind of line in the sand I’d say maybe a third of 45 year olds living in regional Australia could “survive” for 10 years with no income.

  • Nikls94@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’m still recovering from the mistakes I made 8 years ago, for another 3 years maximum, so no savings,