As the situation in regard to report immigrants escalated, and the army may be used against Americans, do you believe there’s a way back, or is this a one way street to civil war?

  • ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    18 days ago

    Nope. They’re headed straight towards jackboot dictatorship.

    If nothing else, Trump and his henchmen are proving day after day that the Americans talking big about their god-given Second Amendment right that keeps the government in check as the reason to own so many firearms and overlook so many deaths by firearm was basically a pretense: this is literally the scenario when they swore right and left they would exercise it and they aren’t.

    All a bunch of phoneys, is what they are. And they’re getting the nasty dictatorship they richly deserve.

    • lemmy_user_838586@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      edit-2
      18 days ago

      Most of the people that talked up the 2nd amendment and that bought a bunch of guns are cheering on what’s happening, so they won’t fight against it. They’re not phonys they’re part of the dictatorship. It seems they like when other people get hurt, as long as its not them.

      They just don’t know history enough to realize, eventually it will be them. Just give it time. The only people that are truly safe from a dictorship are the dictator. Even his inner circle, a dictator will turn on a dime if they perceive disloyalty, or fear being usurped, or you made them look weak by doing a bad job, etc. Literally no one is safe but the dictator, that’s generally why everyone is scared shitless all the time during times of dictatorship. No one is safe.

      • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        18 days ago

        Yeah. I feel like the concept of America is just completely manufactured. Personified by the ignorant blowhards who LARP as heros but only fight when backed by the MIC (hold technological superiority against an inferior force), the Christian taliban who hate jesus and everything he stood for, and the oligarchs who got rich off the backs of immigrants; responsible for the populations mental illness epidemic.

        It’s quite obvious that the average American will roll over and let the Stalin, Putin, Mao, Xi or Hitler force them into absolute supplication before they bother with the minor inconvenience of protest or strikes, while being stupid enough to believe they represent freedom and justice. The only people willing to oppose the psychopaths are too liberalised to accept that they won’t be stopped without violence, or too fragmented to provide meaningful resistance. A massive general strike would work, but that would require more cooperation and discipline than Americans have ever displayed, and the mental illness is too strong.

        I hope I’m wrong.

      • Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        18 days ago

        cheering on what’s happening, so they won’t fight against it.

        Don’t you think this cheering has already lost some of it’s volume?

    • TheLeadenSea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      18 days ago

      As if some private guns would be any sort of fair fight against the full force of the US military anyway

      • thebestaquaman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        18 days ago

        As if an organised military of any kind has any hope of winning a guerrilla war in one of the largest, most populous, and most heavily armed countries on earth.

        The ability of the American people to defeat the American army in a revolution is solely dependent on their willingness to take casualties. It’s been shown time and again that a massively superior army like the US really isn’t able to deal with a war where enemy combatants are also the civilian population. An exception is Israel in Gaza, where they’ve decided to just level everything to the ground, and massacre the civilians.

    • flamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      18 days ago

      American Founding Fathers were not dumb - a lot of them had spent time in the 18th century Europe, which was an interesting place at the time. Full of wars and rebellions. Great for analyzing pros and cons of political systems, awful for an average guy. Keeping the general population armed was a good idea in the context.

      What they failed to predict is the identity politics. That being armed or not will become a show of loyalty to your group rather than defense against tyranny. With those needing it the most being the ones to reject it.

      • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        18 days ago

        The US founding fathers were vehemently against a standing army, because it could be used for exactly this very thing: seizing control from cities and states. That’s why they only wanted militias.

  • It'sbetterwithbutter@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 days ago

    I don’t think Americans have the stomach for a civil war, had a Trump been elected in France, they would have crippled the country long ago.

  • graycube@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    18 days ago

    I think we are still trying peaceful protests and hoping upcoming elections will change things. There is little appetite to escalate to violence yet.

    It is inevitable that ice and ice barbie will encounter violent opposition when they raid a wrong address sometime soon. But it will be localized to that location.

    Most of the radical groups of self armed wackos are working for ice now and reveling in their racism.

    • Rikudou_Sage@lemmings.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      18 days ago

      Which upcoming elections would that be? The ones after the guy currently in power who already tried to overthrow the government once and who can’t legally be reelected peacefully steps out?

      Sure, wait for that to happen! What could go wrong with giving him years to prepare for exactly that?

      • WindyRebel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        17 days ago

        House of Reps are in 2026, and there are all sorts of state and local things so I assume they are meaning all of that.

        If shit starts flipping blue everywhere, the R’s will either back off and play defense or escalate and have a lot more opposition. Hopefully more opposition?

  • Gordon Calhoun@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    18 days ago

    Where would the front(s) be? Seems like in USA CW 1.00, the north/south division made it easy to figure out where the enemy was. Nowadays, the ideological disagreement is much more geographically woven everywhere, with a battlefront possibly existing between every couple of houses in some neighborhoods.

  • In League With Seitan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    17 days ago

    Two of my state’s democratic politicians were shot this morning, one killed, in a targeted assassination. I think it’s already started.

  • Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    18 days ago

    do you believe there’s a way back

    As far as I can see, this government is not well-known for re-evaluating and correcting it’s own course. So the pressure on many groups of people is going to increase further. Ways out are rare.

    If a civil war (or any kind of war) is actually offering a solution, that’s quite another question.

  • Cherry@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    17 days ago

    All my life I have watched movies where the all American hero stands up to the baddie, the facist, the bully, the greedy. I seen so many celebs virtue signal to their political values and causes that help others. The whole gun thing, we keep them to protect our rights.

    But when there is an actual threat the passive acceptance is astounding. It’s quite bizarre to see. My brain can’t reconcile the USA I have watched vrs the USA I am seeing.

    Will it be civil war, the old logic says yes. What I am seeing tells me no.

    • Dragomus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      17 days ago

      I learned a long time ago that in the USA the packaging is always far greater than the content.
      And it seems to apply to everything, be it political, to personal conversations (example: greeting someone with hey how are you, but actually getting an answer to that question is not interesting, just reply with “great, you?”). Or from people praising their city … but totally glossing over the very large populace of homeless living under bridges.
      “We have the best medical care system in the world” … but that it’s only for the top 5% and the rest actually get to see/pay the insane bills is quickly ignored.
      And in movies/television it is also very much present. So, yeah, I don’t expect much from the folks shouting about their amendments or hugging their guns under the pretense of fighting off a dictatorship…

      • aesthelete@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        17 days ago

        The US is number ONE…in bullshit.

        If you’re a Trump-loving magat, then you only care about virtue signaling and performative bullshit when Hollywood celebrities, Democrats, and online socialists do it…and completely ignore that Trump-lovers and Trump himself love performative bullshit and solely prefer a different – crueler and more toxic – variety.

        It’s an aesthetic land full of people who see nothing wrong with screwing over any number of others as long as it leads to fortune, fame, power, or the grand trifecta. Morals, values, and virtues have long since been thrown out as fictional concepts unworthy of any potentially damaging action to uphold or analysis over whether they were lost in any exchange.

        • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          17 days ago

          yeah, only Americans are narcissistic pieces of shit. nobody else in the world does it, and if they do they learned it from Americans.

          America is a vile cesspool of indecent human beings that are a mockery of what non-americans are really like.

          am I doing this right?

          /s

  • Bruncvik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    18 days ago

    Idealism is the privilege of elites. Maslow’s pyramid puts the majority of people into survival mode or comfort, and the US has been boiling the frog towards expanding the bottom of the pyramid for a long time. By the time people noticed that an open revolt (even so much as a work strike) would destroy their lives, it was too late. There are so few charismatic, moral and idealistic elites that the government could take care of them as soon as they threatened to become leaders of a real opposition. I don’t believe there would be a civil war, and I don’t believe there is a way back. The US will become a neofedual country, with a lucky few who have the means to move elsewhere. The best case scenario is for the rest of the world to isolate from the US, both economically and militarily.

  • General_Effort@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    17 days ago

    This does not have the seeds of a civil war.

    Look back to 1861. The US was split between slave and free states. Both regions had different economic models that were in conflict. The slavers of the south controlled most of the nation’s capital. The slaves were worth more than all the railroads and foundries of the north. They had oligarchic control of the southern states.

    When Lincoln was elected, it was the first time that an outspoken abolitionist became president. It was clear, that the demographics of the US were changing in a way that would lose their power and status. So they started a war.

    Those weren’t the uneducated racists that you find waving confederate flags today.


    The US has seen presidential lawlessness before (notably Andrew “Trail of Tears” Jackson). It also has seen lawlessness by state politicians (eg Harry F. “Massive Resistance” Byrd or Governor Orval “Blood will run in the Streets” Faubus).

    The only way I could see a civil war is, if Trump directly threatened the Middle Class and/or the Wealthy Elites.

  • dan1101@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    17 days ago

    I don’t know. People have found ICE facilities and are harassing them there and while they are out on operations. That is great but the Trump administration is likely going to keep over-escalating the response while continuing to ignore laws. He is a “results for my side at any cost” person.