• seaQueue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    207
    ·
    6 months ago

    Any company that intentionally underpays their employees so that they require govt assistance to live should be billed the full cost of all assistance that employee receives.

  • BigMacHole@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    153
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    I’m GLAD we not only BAILED THESE COMPANIES OUT WITH OUR TAX DOLLARS and also DON’T TAX THEM but we ALSO get to Pay Their Employees!

    -Republicans who don’t want to use their Tax Dollars to Feed Starving American Children.

    • bitwaba@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      Why would we feed starving children when they’re just going to grow up being underpaid employees on welfare?!

    • Delphia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      51
      ·
      6 months ago

      Even fast food restaraunts in airports pay a higher hourly rate to compensate the staff for the added pain in the balls for getting to work.

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      they’re salaried? only thing I can come up with.

      If they’re infact hourly… then work is work, and they’re working off the clock.

    • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 months ago

      Been that way forever. Parking brake release with door closed was the standard for a long time. Now they have parking systems on the terminal that sense the aircraft and don’t start the clock until the aircraft pushes back, and stop the clock as soon as it’s parked even if you’re sitting there for 30 minutes waiting for the jet bridge or whatever.

      • Obi@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        Yeah but they also used to have a good enough pay that it was still an okay deal, even if the clock only ran during aircraft movement. It’s still the case with other airlines I have an old friend that went to work for Etihad and he seems to be doing fine. Tells me about the nice weekends away all over the world during rest time, lives in a nice apartment in Dubai with a view, etc. Granted I’d never want to live there but I’m sure you can achieve similar lifestyle with other international airlines (Singapore, KLM, etc etc).

  • RubberDuck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    89
    ·
    6 months ago

    If your boss requires you to be somewhere at a specific time… then that is work … right?

    And being on the other end means you are still at work. It is strange that this job went from glamorous to real shit.

    • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      84
      ·
      6 months ago

      It is strange that this job went from glamorous to real shit.

      You had a government mandated floor on prices until the 70’s in the USA and the 90’s in the EU, which meant that airlines had to compete on amenities and other ways to pull traffic to their airline. Once that price floor was removed, it became apparent that ticket prices were what drove most traffic, so airlines started doing whatever they could to drop ticket prices.

  • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    76
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    I hope the unions give these bastards a nice, swift kick in the ass.

    If anyone should be taking a pay cut, it’s the shitty CEO’s whose decisions make flying a miserable experience.

  • Rolando@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    6 months ago

    I haven’t flown in a while, have they already started asking us to tip flight attendants?

  • Fedizen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    6 months ago

    guys does making airline workers unable to afford life make passengers less safe?

    • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      They are/were. The pilots’ union ratfucked them in the Reagan years and they never recovered because, ya know, the rest of the Reagan years.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    6 months ago

    they are only set to warn little more than $27,000 per year before tax.

    I know that writing is hard, especially when using AI, but please proof read your posts?

    • LwL@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      Oh no, a typo from hitting a key right next to the intended key, this has never happened in the history of journalism!

      • samus12345@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 months ago

        Not only that, the the typo is a legitimate word, meaning it won’t be flagged by spell check. HOWEVER, that’s no excuse to not proofread a submitted article. In fact, it’s more reason why one should.

  • buzz86us@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    40
    ·
    6 months ago

    Well flight attendants have the luxury of not having to live in a single place. I would live in some cheap country.

      • buzz86us@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        18
        ·
        6 months ago

        Well you could also live in some Podunk in Atlanta… Honestly I could see purchasing property in frequently traveled areas… Even if you just have an RV in some lot.

        • Tiefling IRL@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          6 months ago

          Or maybe you should put pressure on a multimillion dollar company to pay their employees a living wage, rather than defend them while blaming the workers

        • Everythingispenguins@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          6 months ago

          Lol long term RV parking starts at about $700 a month. I am sure it is more expensive on the east coast. Pretty quickly you are paying about the same as renting a room. And if it is just sitting in an empty lot no way it will be in the same shape as when you left it. Plus why Atlanta, it is not the most dangerous city but it does rank in the bottom 1/3.

          • buzz86us@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            6 months ago

            Atlanta is a huge Delta hub. With the RV thing I was saying that it could be kept in an employee lot at the airport. Then drive to some land.

            • Everythingispenguins@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              6 months ago

              You are just going to have to trust me on this. That isn’t going to work. Airports are kind of picky about how they let employees park. Also there will be no American airlines flight attendants based out of Atlanta, so they won’t be able to park employee parking. They will have to pay to park and I doubt that they would let you park an RV.

              These flight attendants are literally being paid a poverty wage. Ain’t no hustle and jive that’s going to get around that.

    • Glytch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      You think flight attendants make enough for multiple homes in multiple property tax systems? Did you read the article?