My interests: Journalism, Politics, International Relations, Urbanism

1 - The New Yorker is the best magazine in the English-speaking world. They employ incredibly good writers.

2 - Without The Guardian, British democracy is utterly fucked. The Brits just don’t know it. Most UK papers are owned by shady characters such as Jonathan Harmsworth. The Brits even have a paper (The Independent) owned by a politically-connected Russian mobster (Evgueni Lebedev).

The Guardian’s non-profit structure gives it more freedom that most UK papers. They often investigate stories the rest of the UK press just won’t touch: Paradise Papers, Panama Papers, Cameron’s tax evasion, etc…

3 - The two best newspapers in France are Le Monde and Mediapart, hands down. Mediapart is a non-profit. Le Monde journalists have special rights and can’t be removed by shareholders. These 2 newspapers are more independent than the rest of the french press.

4 - The Financial Times is the favorite newspaper of elites worldwide. CEOs. Billionaires. Millionaires. Presidents. Prime Ministers. Everyone reads it. And honestly, it’s very solid. The information is always extremely reliable. The FT is also the most expensive newspaper on the planet. But they sometimes publish free stories.

5 - The editorial section of the Wall Street Journal is directly controlled by Billionaire Rupert Murdoch. The WSJ is the jewel of his global media empire. Fox News and the New York Post are for influencing the masses. WSJ editorials actually allow him to have influence over US high income readers.

6 - If you read WSJ editorials, Rupert Murdoch’s ideas are very simple. Labor unions must be crushed. Corporate concentration is good. Netanyahu is a brave man. US military spending is good. Unions should be restricted by tough laws. Environmental rules are bad. Slash taxes on large corporations. Of course, he doesn’t write it openly. But this what virtually most of the WSJ editorial content boils down to.

7 - Many talented reporters work for the Wall Street Journal and end up deeply ashamed of it. It feels like prostitution. Many would much rather work for The Financial Times, New York Times or ProPublica.

Rupert Murdoch employs great reporters at the Wall Street Journal simply because he needs them to acquire credibility in order to influence readers through his WSJ editorials. If the WSJ was 100% full of trash, american high income readers wouldn’t purchase it.

8 - The best coverage of Silicon Valley is an online newspaper called The Information. If you truly want to know what Meta/Adobe/Microsoft executives are up to, read The Information. Most of their readers are very wealthy investors and rival tech executives.

9 - 90% of leftists who attack the New York Times are wrong.

"The New York Times doesn’t go after powerful people"

They literally took down Harvey Weinstein.

They literally went after Rupert Murdoch

“The New York Times is very pro-israel”

They exposed Israeli war crimes.

The Israeli Prime Minister says he hates them.

“The New York Times didn’t warn americans against Trump”

They did. They really did.

“The New York Times doesn’t cover labor rights”

They exposed how the biggest US Corporations illegally use child labor

They exposed Starbucks vicious war against unions

I’m not saying it’s a perfect news organization. A perfect news organization does not exist. But it’s a very solid one. 90% of leftists who attack it are using bad faith arguments.

10 - When it comes to television and radio, public media (PBS, BBC, NPR, CBC) is often more professional, more serious, than corporate media. PBS or CBC make outstanding documentaries. Stuff US/Canadian private networks just wouldn’t make.

11 - Generally speaking, journalism that you pay for is far better than journalism you don’t pay for. This is a general rule, not a law of physics. There are exceptions. The Daily Mail has subscribers. It’s largely non-sense. ProPublica is free. They do stunning investigations.

12 - AIPAC is a powerful lobbying organization. But there is limit to their power. There was an intense AIPAC campaign to stop the President Obama from signing a nuclear agreement with Iran. And he defeated them .

13 - Most Trump tweets aren’t written by Donald Trump. They are written by a dude named Dan Scavino. Most americans have no clue who Dan Scavino is. They wouldn’t know him if they met him in the supermarket.

14 - Having a lot of resources is a curse. Countries that have natural ressources (Iran, Algeria, Nigeria, Russia) tend to be highly corrupt and exploited by a small elite. It’s simple. The elite can take control of the oil fields, the gas fields, the mines. Just sell ressources. Shoot protesters. No need to invest in anything else. It’s much better to live a country with limited resources (Taiwan, Japan, Switzerland). Lack of resources force the elites to invest in science and education. The most unlucky country in Africa is Congo. It’s full of diamonds, forests, oil, gas, lithium, cobalt, rare earth. So Congo has suffered horribly because of that. In fact, it’s still being looted.

15 - If you want to transform an authoritarian regime into a democracy from within, the number 1 tool you need are powerful labor unions. Powerful unions can basically go on a general solidarity strike and shut down an entire economy.

16 - Everything Barack Obama predicted would happen if the US didn’t sign the nuclear agreement with Iran actually happened. Trump left the agreement. Iran started enriching nuclear fuel. Then a major war happened.

17 - Many Middle Easterners are very tribal. Most Israelis see themselves as Jewish first, Israeli second. Syrian druzes think of themselves as Druze first, Syrian second. Many lebanese Shias see themselves as Shia first, Lebanese a distant second. And so on. Their loyalty often lies more to their tribe than to the State they actually live in.

18 - Imperialism was bad. But imperialism didn’t actually cause instability in the Middle East. The most stable period was actually Ottoman Imperialism. For 5 centuries there was commerce and peace. Then, there was the British/French empire. Apart from some episodes of violence, it was stable. But when imperialism ended, it was basically a mess. Jews vs Arabs. Christians vs Sunnis. Arabs vs Persians. Jews vs Shias. Arabs vs Kurds. Alawis vs Sunnis. To this day, many of them have this tribal mindset.

19 - Saying “we don’t speak with terrorists” is completely dumb. Many terrorist organizations later became peaceful. Many terrorist leaders later became statesmen. It’s wrong to say “We can’t make any peace with those who hands are stained with blood”. Get out of here with that non-sense. If you truly want peace, seeking only decent leaders means you aren’t going to find anyone at all. Criminals make peace. This isn’t Scandinavia.

20 - The most ugly, polluted and noisy cities in the world have one thing in common. They have cars everywhere. The best cities in the world (Singapore, Geneva, Copenhaguen) all have one thing in common. They try to aggressively reduce car ownership. If you want to improve the cities, you need to increase parking costs. Pedestrianize streets. Build bike lanes. The hard part is the politics. Car owners see the short term pain. They never see the long term gains.

What are things you know because of your personal interests that most people have no idea about ?

  • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    Having a lot of resources is a curse. Countries that have natural ressources (Iran, Algeria, Nigeria, Russia) tend to be highly corrupt and exploited by a small elite. It’s simple. The elite can take control of the oil fields, the gas fields, the mines. Just sell ressources. Shoot protesters. No need to invest in anything else. It’s much better to live a country with limited resources (Taiwan, Japan, Switzerland). Lack of resources force the elites to invest in science and education. The most unlucky country in Africa is Congo. It’s full of diamonds, forests, oil, gas, lithium, cobalt, rare earth. So Congo has suffered horribly because of that. In fact, it’s still being looted.

    This isn’t actually true. You can look at the Nordic countries which are very oil rich and owe a lot of their prosperity to that. The United States is pretty resource rich as well. What is a curse is imperialism, and having lots of resources attracts lots of imperialists. The “oil curse” or “resource curse” is a myth made up to whitewash imperialists and absolve them of guilt.

    Strap in and let me tell you about my special interest, Iranian history. In the 1800s, before the discovery of oil, Iran was ruled by an extremely corrupt line of shahs who sold out every part of the impoverished country to fund their lavish lifestyles and massive harems - to the point that other countries had to step in and say that they weren’t allowed to sell out that much of the country. But the Iranian people were upset by this state of affairs, and staged a massive boycott, which set the stage for a mass movement in 1905 that established a democratic parliament and a constitution, with the support of an overwhelming majority, including the clergy (a fatwa was actually issued declaring violating the boycott to be haram). Iran was well on it’s way to becoming a peaceful, prosperous, democratic society - but then the Fire Nation attacked, in the form of the British and Russian Empires moving in, shelling the parliament building and dividing the nation between themselves, like a pack of wolves.

    The Iranian people suffered tremendously in the following years, with major plagues, famines, and genocide conducted by the Ottoman Empire. Of course, the Russian Empire collapsed, the British took the opportunity to unify the country, propping up a shah of a new dynasty as their puppet. That shah proved uncooperative during WWII, and the Allies invaded to set up supply lines between the Eastern and Western fronts and to secure the Iranian oil (which had now been discovered), and the shah was forced to abdicate to his son, who the British found more amenable.

    The British technically owned the rights to Iran’s oil, but the deal they had made was with the previous dynasty (Qajar). The one that had been selling out their country to an absurd degree, the one that had been overthrown by the people precisely because they were selling out the country, and so naturally the deal they had struck with the British regarding oil (which had been made before oil had even been discovered in Iran) gave them extremely lucrative terms. But it actually didn’t matter how lucrative the terms were because the British were just straight up stealing it. They falsified their records and forbid any kind of inspection of their facilities.

    This led the Iranian people to once again mobilize in support of democracy and self-rule. As outrage over the exploitation grew, the shah, who had previously rubber-stamped anyone the British picked, began to fear his own people more than the British and appointed democratic reformer Mohammad Mossadegh as prime minister. After the Iranians had watched the British stonewall them for decades, Mossadegh nationalized the oil industry with overwhelming public support. Iran was once again on track to becoming a peaceful, democratic, independent country.

    But the British set up a naval blockade that crippled their economy. Iranians, at this point, had a neutral to positive view of the US, and hoped that it would live up to its stated ideals and support them against the British. The British, meanwhile, expected the Americans to back up their “property rights.” President Truman threw up his hands in frustration, seeing both sides as intransigent. But Churchill simply waited him out, and offered his successor Eisenhower British support in Korea and NATO in exchange for the CIA launching a coup, and so Iran was passed around like a bargaining chip. Mossadegh’s commitment to democratic ideals allowed the CIA free reign, he didn’t crack down on the press despite the CIA controlling virtually all the newspapers, he didn’t crack down on protests while the CIA was hiring protesters on both sides, etc. Naturally, he was ousted (although the CIA denied it/covered it up for decades), and the shah was given much more power (which he used to hunt down and exterminate the Iranian left) and the oil kept flowing.

    But after a few decades, once again, outrage over the exploitation came to a head, and the shah, seeking to appease his people, participated in a multinational oil boycott. But as a result, his foreign support was withdrawn, which set the stage for the Islamic Revolution. President Carter, against the advice of his state department, allowed the shah to take refuge in the US. Naturally, this outraged the Iranians, because the US had previously staged a coup to install the very same man as a dictator. In retaliation, some of the revolutionaries seized the US embassy and took hostages. This of course led to a breakdown in relations between the US and Iran.

    And so, Iran is often held up as an example of this supposed “resource curse” that leads to political instability (not to mention the old line about “Islam is incompatible with democracy”), but the reality is that the country had multiple times in its history where it could’ve become stable, peaceful, democratic, and independent, but those chances were destroyed, not by Iranians, but by foreign imperialists, the vile colonial empires of the British and Americans. Had they simply been left alone, they would not have suffered from this supposed “resource curse.” If you look into the history of any similar country, you will find a similar story. But the history of these countries are simply not taught and not known in the imperial core, and so other explanations are invented.

    • Melonpoly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 days ago

      There’s a documentary about the British and American involvement in the Iranian coup called ‘Coup 53’

      • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        Thanks, I didn’t know about it and I’ll definitely check it out.

        I didn’t source very well but a lot of my info comes from “All the Shah’s Men” by Stephen Kinzer, which I highly recommend.

        • RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          Well yeah that’s why talking about “oil rich Nordic countries” is stupid, only one of them is oil rich. That was the point

          This isn’t actually true. You can look at the Nordic countries which are very oil rich and owe a lot of their prosperity to that.

  • over_clox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    9 days ago

    You can clean dirty/corroded electronic edge contacts with a pencil eraser. Also helps equally as cleaning preparation before soldering.

    Go ahead and try it yourself on an old penny, it’ll clean up and look shiny as new. Same principle for electronics.

      • proudblond@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 days ago

        Wait wait wait, for real? I’m 42, how did I not know this?

        The real LPT is always in the comments.

          • Paragone@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 days ago

            Snap-On’s Snap-On: they are a BRAND-Identity, not an engineering-actual-solutions-to-acutal-problems company.

            There’s a Project Farm, or something, yt-channel, where they guy just does comparative-tests of different products, to see what the truth is, & … it’s a resource all ought be knowing-about.

            Ha I DID remember its name right! https://www.youtube.com/@ProjectFarm/videos

            _ /\ _

      • over_clox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 days ago

        Awesome!

        Yeah, there’s one drawback though, if the edge contacts or whatever trace was originally gold plated, the pencil eraser trick will pretty quickly wear away the gold plating.

        But… If you got corroded gold plated contacts, the gold plating itself is the least of your worries, you want clean metal…

        • Paragone@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 days ago

          Gold doesn’t corrode, Hoomin…

          If it’s corroded where the gold wasn’t … that’s different.

          _ /\ _

          • over_clox@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            8 days ago

            I’m well aware of that actually. But if the gold plating is already worn and/or pitted, then the copper underneath will corrode through and even on top of the gold.

            Plus, if it counts for anything, I happen to have an open faced USB-A flash drive on my pocket keychain, that actually does still have its gold contact plating, but just looking at it right now, I’ll have to clean the contacts once again from pocket crud before I use it again.

            In that case though, I usually just lick my thumb, wipe the contacts clean, and dry it off with my shirt. Gold itself might not inherently corrode, but it can and will still get dirty, plus that plating is super thin and just regular use will eventually wear it away down to the bare copper underneath.

            • Paragone@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 days ago

              Please stick a cap on it, if you want it to last.

              Tech that works is worth protecting.

              _ /\ _

              • over_clox@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                7 days ago

                Nah, it’s an early model Lacie USB key shell from 2011. The way they designed it, it was actually never meant to go on an actual keychain nor in my pocket, it was meant to go on a lanyard. Also, the way they designed it, a cap could never stay on there, even if I tried.

                I had to very carefully arrange my keys to lay perfectly parallel to and not rub against the USB traces or bend or otherwise damage the key. But yeah for real, it would never hold a cap, especially in my pocket, even if I tried.

                It’s almost held up pretty well since 2011 though, and has even been dismantled and rebuilt twice for flash storage upgrades. Currently I keep Linux Mint MATE 22.1 installer/live boot on it, nothing else right now so no personal data, so honestly it’s no big deal for me.

                For reference, here’s a new one on eBay, with way more than the 8GB module I currently have in mine…

                https://www.ebay.com/itm/396237518709

    • blave@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      I learned this when I was a kid, and the only problem is that nowadays, I haven’t seen a pencil nor its eraser and probably 15 years.

      Still, a pretty great tip!

      • Krudler@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        Normal people use alcohol or flux

        I do a ton of electronics repair, would never in a million years think that an eraser is going to do anything but make my life harder

          • Krudler@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            8 days ago

            Why would I do that? So I can fuck up my precision solders on expensive boards??? I need my electrical connections to be free of dirt and debris, and the way to accomplish that is by cleaning it with a solvent or flux. Using an eraser is the equivalent of rubbing it with your fingers… you’re not going to remove the small particulate or oils. Haven’t tried it; won’t. Its piss-poor advice.

            Edit downvoters don’t seem to be aware that the last thing you need on a solder site is eraser particulate. Do yourself a favor, go rub a pencil eraser on two things and then try to solder them together without cleaning with flux or alcohol. Send pics lol

            • Paragone@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 days ago

              We who’ve done it blow the particles away to get them out of the area.

              It’s a practice used when cleaning ( by sanding, grinding, etc ) throughout industry.

              The removing-film & surface-dirt with an eraser is valid, but not cleanroom, obviously.

              _ /\ _

  • justdaveisfine@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    8 days ago

    This feels well known but…

    Adding split screen to games is actually a very funky process.

    It changes how the UI works, input setup, how sounds are handled, how some effects are done, how optimizing is worked on, it significantly increases testing and QA time because split screen may have its own unique bugs, and other quirky problems due to either the game’s or engine’s design (most of the time split screen is not a high priority focus compared to other features)

    All that for something a very small percentage of players will even look at.

    I often see people lament the lack of split screen games, and I do wish there were more, but its a hard sell and I can see why many games abandon it completely.

    (Save for a few that made it entirely their focus, like split fiction)

    • Ephera@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 days ago

      Yeah, I feel like people are mainly confused/annoyed, because splitscreen multiplayer existed before online multiplayer, so seeing games ship with online multiplayer but no splitscreen, that just feels backwards…

    • alternategait@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      I love split fiction (even if we are currently stuck), and really enjoyed it takes two. Do you know of other co-op games that can support a serious gamer and someone who is terrible at gaming (I’m the one who is terrible at gaming)?

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        Super Mario Odyssey 2 player. 2p controls the cap I think.

        Also Galaxy 1 and 2 I guess. Just recently re-released (and overpriced of course).

      • justdaveisfine@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        Depends how bad terrible is, but here are a few that are less intensive and should be pretty easy to pick up and ones I’ve generally liked (All on PC):

        • Baldur’s Gate 3/Divinity Original Sin 1+2 (These are ‘serious’ games but they are turn based strategy so they’re more thinking than reflex)
        • BattleBlock Theater
        • Castle Crashers
        • Cassette Beasts
        • Crypt of the NecroDancer (If you don’t got rhythm then this ones hard)
        • Guacamelee
        • Human Fall Flat
        • ibb & obb
        • KeyWe
        • Kingdom Two Crowns
        • Pretty much any Lego game (They are forgiving if you make mistakes but also have more difficult collection hunting if you play it more seriously. They are all very similar though so I’d really only get one or two as you’ll get burned out on them quick)
        • Lovers in a Dangerous Spacetime
        • Magicka (Is sometimes difficult but also hilarious)
        • Octodad: Dadliest Catch
        • Overcooked 1/2
        • Resident Evil 5/6 (These can have difficult patches but they’re generally not very hard)
        • Spiritfarer
        • Trine series (I’ve generally liked them all)

        There are probably more but I’m not looking at my whole collection right now.

          • justdaveisfine@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 days ago

            Overcooked is sort of a funky one because the levels are designed to have you tripping over other players. Depending on the other players, this can be a hilarious or infuriating experience.

            It takes two has a huge variety of stuff like platforming and 3rd person shooting, so if you can handle that you can probably handle most of these.

  • Wugmeister@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    9 days ago

    You know how sometimes when you stand up you get lightheaded? If you squeeze your buttcheeks as hard as you can, that immediately stops.

  • Krudler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    9 days ago

    I know more than I ever planned on knowing about audio equipment.

    The first thing you need to know is that you cannot defeat physics with marketing hype. I don’t give a flying fuck how many wave guides Bose talks about or all the technology under the sun, you need a big speaker to make deep bass. There is nothing anyone can say or do to change this.

    And when you look up audio equipment, ignore the “music power” because they will state what is the momentary maximum power the speaker can handle… but we don’t play micro seconds of MAX power music, we play steady audio… what you need to know is the RMS power the device can handle or output.

    Furthermore, audio cables are a complete sham. You can take any power cable from a discarded vacuum, boom, you’ve got speaker cable. But but gold connectors… Yeah no.

    • mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      Yeah, there’s a lot of snake oil in the audio world.

      You’re spending five thousand dollars on solid gold cables that were soldered by blind monks then braided by trained gerbils, in an attempt to get the highest fidelity possible. Meanwhile, the album was recorded using the cheapest 10¢ per ft star-quad cable the studio could find, and $4.50 Neutrik connectors that were soldered by the studio’s unpaid intern.

      There have been multiple instances where I have seen someone asking for advice on trying to track down an intermittent buzz in their system. They had people saying they needed to totally rethink their entire system, they had to buy thousands of dollars of new gear, completely change how they had everything routed… When all they needed was a 5¢ ferrite bead.

    • hperrin@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 days ago

      Be careful with that makeshift speaker cabling though. If you’re using small gauge power cables, you could easily melt those cables with a powerful enough audio signal.

      • Krudler@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        You’d be hard-pressed to find an amplifier that could output so much power it would melt a vacuum power cable or lamp cord lol

        Light-duty power cables can handle like 1,400-1,800W you’re never going to find anything that can output even close to that… unless you are the audio/hardware guy for outdoor concerts.

        Of course, don’t use angel-hair wires

        • hperrin@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          8 days ago

          Would you use this as speaker wire?

          https://www.amazon.com/Conductor-Electrical-Oxygen-free-Automotive-2AWG-32-8FT/dp/B093LCQQFY/

          I wouldn’t.

          I’m just saying be careful. Power cables aren’t all equal. Anyone doing this should understand what kind of wire they need, and make sure they’re not using one that’s too thin.

          Stuff like this:

          https://www.amazon.com/Cordless-Charger-XBCHGX140-Replacement-Charging/dp/B0BFDFXYR4/

          Is unsafe, even though it’s for a (rechargeable) vacuum.

          • Paragone@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 days ago

            Use ANY shielded-cable which can handle the current, & has the right kind of connectors on the ends.

            Period.

            That’s the ONLY 3 criteria I care about, now.

            That’s why I recommend Cat6A cable for the foil-shielding in it, to block alien-crosstalk, in ethernet setups: you don’t get speed-degradation-due-to-alien-crosstalk.

            All the screaming that computer-speakers did, when a GSM phone was near them, that was due to lack-of-shielding.

            Find any trustworthy site which lists AWG vs Amperage, & you’ll see what current you can put on that gauge of wire.

            Match your current-carrying-capability, & don’t go overboard ( 2AWG for speakers for anything less than a DisasterArea concert, is stupid ).

            Signal travels through copper at around 0.7 * speed-of-light ( impedance monkeys it, at higher-frequencies, audio’s functionally DC, for cables )

            & the OP wasn’t talking about cordless-rechargeable vacuum-cleaners, but for normal vacuuming-the-whole-floor vacuum-cleaners, which have … 14AWG wire, roughly, in 'em.

            _ /\ _

            • hperrin@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              8 days ago

              Yes, so, basically what I said. Be careful and understand what you need.

              If you’re thinking from the mind of someone who understands current, of course you wouldn’t use 26 awg wire for speakers. When you’re giving advice online though, you have to think from the mind of someone who doesn’t have your same knowledge. OP telling someone “just use a vacuum cleaner power cable” isn’t specific enough, because they don’t have the knowledge OP has to understand what that means.

              I completely agree with OP that speaker wire is generally a rip off, and using any suitable wire is fine. I just want OP to also say that you need to know what you’re doing, or you could start a fire.

              I’ll give you an anecdote to hopefully illustrate my point. A while ago I was hanging out in a friend’s backyard on a chilly night. She wanted to provide some warmth for the guests, so she brought out two space heaters and a power strip. She plugged them in and turned them on and they ran for about 30 seconds, and the circuit breaker tripped. She went over to it and flipped it back on, and then about 30 seconds later it tripped again.

              I’m not saying this to disparage her, but to illustrate that many people don’t understand current, and don’t realize what is and isn’t dangerous when it comes to electricity. It wasn’t unreasonable for her to assume that would work, and it wasn’t unreasonable for her not to understand why it wasn’t. The breaker is there for exactly that reason. When you’re talking about making your own wire, it’s too easy to get it wrong if you don’t know what you’re doing, and that could cause a fire.

              • Paragone@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 days ago

                https://xkcd.com/2501/

                Understanding that you need more conductor-cross-section to carry more current’s sooo fundamental to me, that that itself is a problem, obviously…

                I’d presumed that telling people to go search for AWG that can carry whatever-current, would be enough…

                The 14AWG point, though, should do for apartment-dwellers & normal home-owners.

                ( seriously, if you’re doing some kind of mega-installation, & you’re putting 20A circuits in, specifically for your amps, then you’d better be able to calculate Ohm’s law, for your speakers, & work-out what currents are required for them )

                _ /\ _

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      When I was a cable guy a customer’s Monster Cable RG-6 fell off in my hand.

      “Ah! My Monster Cable!”

      “I’ll make you a better one.”

      I knew they weren’t up to the hype, but fuck me, the shielding was single-wrap, made of Chinese whispers and toilet paper. The copper core could be bent with harsh words. The dialectric (white part) was some form of marshmallow. In my 3 years in the industry, Monster was the shittiest cable I ever encountered, a cut below the cheapest Walmart cable.

      Made him a new one, cut to size, out of our standard quad-shielded, real coax. Quite a lesson for both of us.

    • Agent641@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 days ago

      Cable hype is in every industry. You can buy hundred-dollar gold plated “Gaming” HDMI cables that are no better than any other HDMI cord

  • bitofarambler@crazypeople.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    It currently costs $500 USD to live in most countries (rent, food, wifi, groceries) and $1000 to live in the rest.

    Speaking fluent English is currently an incredibly valuable and valued skill that adult English speakers have been practicing their entire life, at least a couple decades; a skill in the same way engineering expertise, ballet proficiency or any other well-executed ability is a skill, with the added bonus that speaking fluent English guarantees employment.

    US Americans can travel visa-free or visa-on-arrival to 180 countries.

    I’ve been traveling 15 yearsish and owned a couple English schools in China.

      • bitofarambler@crazypeople.online
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        Sure. Trying to be brief: I was hired in a funny way by a drunk person who posted an ad for an english teacher in the USA instead of China, I stumbled across the ad and decided an adventure would be way better than continuing to struggle in the US. Went to china, loved the job and money for a month, then the guy was like “schools are hard, I’m quitting and also moving away.”

        I said “give me the school. If I fix the business, you’ll have a school making money, and if I can’t, you don’t lose anything.” He said “okay” and left Beijing for several months. When he came back, we had a bunch of extra money and the school was running great, so he asked me to become a part-owner of the school and help him manage it.

        I left after a few years, traveled, then a friend asked me to come back to China to start a school with her and she would deal with the parents, I would manage the students, curriculum, and the school itself. I had been traveling a while so I said okay and that was the second school, which was very successful until I decided to travel again and gave all my students to another school.

        I’m not sure if the episodes explaining those stories in detail have come out yet. But they are funny stories and memories, so I’m glad I got to tell it here.

        Oh, this is the episode about why i left the first school.

  • Asafum@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    Amethyst, citrine and tigers eye are all Quartz they just have various impurities and structural differences that create the differences in color/appearance. Some can even be irritated or heated to change their color.

    The Orion nebula can be seen with binoculars depending on the lighting and the famous horse head nebula is actually located very close to it in the sky (visually from our perspective, not physically)

  • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    This might not be uncommon around here, but…

    Between D&D and video games, I can identify most medieval weapons and armor.

    Mythological beasts as well.

      • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        9 days ago

        Because it’s not strictly one handed or two handed.

        Its a combination of two separate families, like an illegitimate child. (Their logic and definitions, not mine)

      • darreninthenet@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 days ago

        It’s probably due to the word batard in French meaning something of a dual nature or dubious origin (and can therefore also be used for our more usual use of the word bastard).

        As the bastard, or hand a half, sword is halfway in length between the single handed long sword and the two handed great sword and could be used either way. The French specifically call it an epee batard and IIRC correctly there’s a type of French bread called a batard which is like a hybrid of a loaf and a baguette.

  • hperrin@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    People really misunderstand a lot about diving.

    1

    • SCUBA is an acronym that stands for Self Contained Underwater Breathing Aparatus
    • SCUBA specifically refers to the gear with a tank, and not gear that uses an air hose connected to a boat
    • Tanks are usually filled with just regular air, nothing special about it
    • Oxygen becomes toxic at depth, so if you were to dive with 100% oxygen, you’d die at a fairly shallow depth

    2

    • Your flesh and blood absorb nitrogen from the air
    • The amount it absorbs is based on the pressure of your environment/the air you’re breathing
    • When you come back up to one atmosphere (1 bar) of pressure, your body slowly releases the nitrogen it has absorbed at depth
    • This is a physical process, not one your body has any control over
    • If you stay down for too long or come up too quickly, the nitrogen will become bubbles in your flesh and blood (the bends)
    • That’s painful and can kill you
    • A hyperbaric chamber (hyper-more than normal, baric-atmospheric pressure) can help by forcing the nitrogen bubbles to dissolve back into your flesh and release slowly
    • You can use a special mix of air with more oxygen and less nitrogen than normal to increase safe dive times, but this also decreases maximum depth, because of oxygen toxicity

    3

    • Another danger is if you ascend without breathing out, your lungs can pop
    • Humans don’t have any sense to tell us our lungs are too full
    • This is called lung over-expansion and can also kill you
    • It is also treated with a stay in a hyperbaric chamber

    4

    • Another danger is nitrogen at depth can induce an intoxicating effect like alcohol
    • This is called nitrogen narcosis and can cause you to act carelessly and get yourself killed
    • If you experience this, the correct course of action is to ascend a bit (like 15 feet) and wait until it subsides before you attempt to descend again
    • You can use a special mix of air with helium or a special mix of just helium and oxygen to reduce the risk of narcosis on deep dives

    5

    • Regular diving gear has two second stage regulators, your main and your octo
    • The name octo comes from how it makes your gear look like an octopus
    • It’s a backup for you and for anyone who might need it
    • The hose is yellow to make it easy to see

    6

    • The vest you wear (not everyone uses one, but most divers do) is called a Buoyancy Control Device, or BCD, or just BC
    • It fills with air from your tank when you want to ascend to increase your buoyancy
    • In an emergency, you can drop your weights, which should make you positively buoyant and cause you to ascend

    And last, but not least:

    • Diving is incredibly fun and an experience I’d recommend to everyone who is even remotely interested
    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 days ago

      You missed a bit. Overcoming your reflexes to “breath” underwater is HELL.

      Dated a beautiful diver girl. She lived in the water. Got me in a class with one other person, young guy, to get our first cert.

      Don’t know how to put this. Let’s say I’ve been in scarier situations than the vast majority of people reading this comment.

      Truck full of skinheads armed with AR-15s rolls up to the punker hangout? Meh. Saving my own life in the face of certain death, twice? I could do it again, I hope.

      I’ve been brave. I’ve been a coward. I have never in life been so fucking scared as taking that first breath underwater, took every ounce of courage I had. Only reason I didn’t bail? Didn’t want the young guy to fail. Because he was shitting bricks, couldn’t let him down. We made it!

      • vithigar@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        This definitely varies by person. I never found it bad at all to take that first breath, and even found myself with the opposite problem. Once I was used to SCUBA I had to remind myself not to breathe while swimming without gear.

    • vithigar@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      Additional “fun” fact about lung over-expansion. The pressure difference necessary for it to happen is startlingly small if you, for some insane reason, completely fill your lungs. You can do damage rising single digit numbers of feet.

    • BlueÆther@no.lastname.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      My grandfather was playing with DIY aqua-lungs immediately after the war - listening to his stories when I was knee high I really dont know how the first guys that were doing this didn’t kill them selves more often.

      • hperrin@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        They did. Quite often. :(

        But their sacrifices have led to much safer equipment and practices.

  • sexual_tomato@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    If you want to design and build large-scale industrial plant infrastructure like pressure vessels, piping, pumps, turbines, etc., most of the codes and standards you have to meet cost money to even see -and they are NOT cheap (in the tens of thousands of dollars for a full set).

    In several jurisdictions, the standards are incorporated into law by reference. Most people think that you should have free access to read the text of the law that you’re beholden to, but what happens when a copyrighted work is incorporated into the law?

    archive.org asserted the law should be free to access. However, they lost a copyright lawsuit brought by the American society of mechanical engineers because they were hosting copies of these standards.

    So, to read the law you are beholden to in this sector of manufacturing, you must either pay a private organization ($$$) or memorize it (impossible); you cannot make copies for yourself to reference at your leisure

    • TheJesusaurus@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      Ahahah totally man. I dealt with a lot of this compliance, regulatory, quasi legal, bullshit too.

      At one point to become an inspector of those huge oil storage tanks I had to basically study the specific building codes for those tanks back to front and upside down.

      Cost hundreds to get the standards legally, thousands to take the tests, become registered, work with a qualified inspector etc.

      That was 1 single standard, there are thousands. Tens of thousands when we’re talking industry generally, probably hundreds.

      Then when you add international standards, everything is duplicated now per country. We make trade agreements and such to somewhat ease the shock of moving products and services across that Gulf of understanding.

      Standards are trending in a good direction, we’re slowly moving towards more and more harmonized and universal standards but, we will never reach it, because we’re human, well always just be adapting to what comes next

  • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    9 days ago

    Apart from some episodes of violence, it was stable. But when imperialism ended, it was basically a mess.

    Not directly relevant to your question, but for starters you should read about Sykes-Picot. The destabilizing impact of imperialism simply comes after the imperialist force and its vastly superior military leaves. Also you’re thinking of colonialism; imperialism never ended.

    Now to directly answer your question, I’m a politics and history guy and the Ottoman Empire doesn’t get nearly enough hate for its role in shaping the modern Middle East. The stagnation they caused that allowed the region to be so easily swallowed by Western imperial interests is a direct result of centuries of Ottoman stagnation and authoritarian incompetence. The janissaries in particular deserve a special place in hell for their role in obstructing any and all progress in the Empire until it was too late. Those fucks are the reason there’s no Ottoman Catherine the Great or Frederick the Great.

    • Paragone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      Thank you for pointing-out that imperialism & colonialism are distinct.

      I’d not understood that clearly.

      _ /\ _

  • Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 days ago

    Almost every song you’ve heard has included at least one sample from the Roland TR808 drum machine.

    You really do just need to turn it off and back on again 99% of the time.

    Almost all of the internet utilizes akamai, Amazon, or cloudflare for some piece of vital infrastructure.

    If properly made, furniture made of solid hardwoods will last multiple lifetimes.

    • BenLeMan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 days ago

      Depending on the era and genre, the most ubiquitous drum machine would be a Linn Drum (late 70s & early 80s pop, e.g. ABBA), Roland TR-808 (80s soft pop, e.g. Phil Collins), or Roland TR-909 (90s House/Dance/Trance, e.g. Scooter).

      There are many others, of course, and even if the actual machine wasn’t used, these sounds have been sampled and reused countless times, e.g. using a Fairlight CMI.

      Interestingly, the 808 is the only one of the three that does NOT use samples itself but synthesizes all of its percussion sounds, which gives it a rather distinct character. Perhaps that is what led you to believe that it is the most ubiquitous drum machine - it’s easier to recognize than the others, even in a crowded mix.

      • Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 days ago

        Totally fair point, I suppose I just listen to more genres that incorporate 808s than the others. I’ve always loved the simplicity of the sine based synthesis of the 808, so much can be done with it.

  • FishFace@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    9 days ago

    I look up everything interesting that occurs to me on Wikipedia so I know a lot of shit about random topics.

    Not sure the Guardian has enough readers to be so influential in British politics tbh, though it does try

    • blave@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      I look up everything interesting that occurs to me on Wikipedia so I know a lot of shit about random topics.

      This is a very valuable habit.

  • Noxy@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 days ago

    in the open source multiplayer game Space Station 14, you can swab pollen from cannabis plants to egg-plants (as in, plants that grow eggs, distinct from eggplant) and have a chance to grow eggs full of pure THC