• Xylight@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    12 days ago

    ill delete mine if:

    1. it has any form of information that could potentially be used to personally identify me when I realize retroactively

    2. i get embarrassed when I try to contribute to a community and get down voted to oblivion

    • Elaine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 days ago

      More often than not this is the reason right here. I post, then go reload to see my post out in the wild. Sometimes it takes a minute to realize I must erase its existence.

  • megane-kun@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    I tend not to, but only because I don’t post a lot.

    But I’ll echo some of the answers here and say that if I would delete my post it’d be because:

    • it was a duplicate
    • it was posted on the wrong community
    • it was not the “right kind of post” for the community
    • it offers nothing of value

    And fears that my post will be one of those listed above keeps me from posting.

    As for comments, I also tend not to delete, but might if:

    • it was a duplicate
    • it was posted on the wrong thread
    • it was not the “right kind of comment” for the post
    • it offers nothing of value (but I tend to let this be anyways)

    And again, fears that my comment will be one of those listed keeps me from commenting.

    • psychOdelic@discuss.tchncs.deOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 days ago

      Rate this project The Linux From Scratch project (also called LFS) has announced the release of version 12.4 of the project’s guide. This guide walks the reader through the steps to create a minimal Linux distribution from source code. The release announcement reads: “The Linux From Scratch community announces the release of LFS Version 12.4. Major changes include toolchain updates to binutils-2.45, gcc-15.2.0, and glibc-2.42. In total, 49 packages were updated since the last release. Changes to the text have also been made throughout the book. The Linux kernel has also been updated to version 6.16.1. Packages that have security updates include: glibc, coreutils, expat, perl, Python, systemd, vim, and xz. See the Security Advisories for details. Overall there have been 146 commits to LFS since the previous stable version of the book. You can read the book online, or download to read locally. You can read the systemd version of the book online at LFS-systemd, or download-systemd to read locally.” The books can be downloaded from the project’s download page in SysV init and systemd flavours: LFS (pkglist) - 12.4 (HTML), 12.4 (PDF), 12.4-systemd (HTML), 12.4-systemd (PDF), BLFS (pkglist) - 12.4 (HTML), 12.4-systemd (HTML).

  • StrawberryPigtails@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    13 days ago

    I’ve only ever deleted one comment I’ve made. I was having a bad day, I was being overly pissy and inflammatory, and the comment didn’t add anything to the conversation. If I had been the mod of that community, I would have deleted it and possibly banned myself. Since they didn’t, I did. Once I came to my senses.

    For the most part, though, I’m happy to leave my stupidity up for the future to see.

  • 0x01@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    13 days ago

    I’ve deleted a few, usually if I accidentally doxx someone or literally post the wrong place (like I intended to reply to one person but somehow the message was posted as a response to another)

  • Libb@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 days ago

    I regularly notice how some people simply delete their post because they don’t like the way people are answering to it. It’s fine they don’t like those answers, it’s not fair they are given the power to mute them.

    I find that behavior annoying. Not because someone deletes their post. I mean, they’re free to do whatever they want, but because by doing so they also render the entire discussion unavailable.

    Like if all the other participants were submitted to their whims.

    Imho, a solution could be to let people delete their post but not the technical-something-whatever that made their post accessible to read and to answer. And so, no matter how shy or regretful the OP could ever be, people that have answered would not be dependent on their willingness to let them speak. And even if the OP was deleted other people would still be able to read the comments and maybe keep on discussing without te OP being involved.

    • miss_demeanour@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      13 days ago

      Agreed. Could be a relatively active post, excellent engagement and then:

      doofus1: “Is this AI?” <it clearly isn’t>

      doofus2: “Now that you mention it…proceeds to launch 5 paragraphs as to how it’s AI…blah, blah…” <it isn’t AI>

      experts1, 2, &3: “It’s not AI”

      doofuses 1& 2, whilst being downvoted into oblivion, push back ad nauseum despite admitting they could be wrong.

      14 comments in the thread later, a mod removes some…

      Original post succesully derailed.

      OP deletes popular post, bc “Why bother?”

      lather.rinse.repeat.