Mine’s that people who insist on correcting others grammar on internet forums are little shits who peaked in grade six as a teacher’s pet and get off on exerting their “superiority” on others.
Fuck you “less than” is just better than “fewer then.” Think I’m wrong, tell me what these symbols are called “< >” that’s what I thought loser.
The only grammar thing that annoys the hell out of me is “on accident”. No idea why, it just really sticks out and bugs me when I come across it. I rarely mention it when I see it though, because I know that noone actually cares.
I’m gonna start saying “on accident” by purpose from now on
You’re just saying that because you know you’re going to do it on accident anyway, and you’re trying to get ahead of it
That bugs me as well. Another is ‘off of’. There is no use case when ‘off’ isn’t sufficient.
I often hear that in “based off of” where “on” makes even more sense. The thing that it’s based on forms the basis or foundation that the new thing is built upon, so you’re basing it on that.
:eyetwitch:
I think this is a dialectical thing! Iirc, in the US it’s more common to say “on accident” and in the UK it’s “by accident”, but I’m not certain
Canada, by accident!
I’m not sure I’ve heard someone say on accident it’s always by accident in the PNW (West Coast USA)
PNW here as well, I only hear ‘on accident’. It makes more sense than ‘by accident’ since we also say ‘on purpose’ and not ‘by purpose’.
The rules of the English language have never had anything to do with making sense.
Repping East Coast, that’s what we say, or simply, “accidentally.”