• Stamets@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    ·
    11 days ago

    So it’s a taxi.

    Motherfucker loves trying to reinvent the wheel only to end up at the goddamn wheel.

    “I’ma invent a giant system that goes underground so we can move people around faster!” That’s a subway, you santorum-covered condom.

    • tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      11 days ago

      Par for the course for techbros. His hyperloop was a shittier train. UberPool is a shittier bus. All these dumbfucks grow up being told they’re the specialest boys, so of course people who made better things before them were clearly wrong.

      • Eheran@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        11 days ago

        Hyperloop was a raging success - it stopped funding of railway. I believe he even admitted that this was behind it to begin with.

        • albert180@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          11 days ago

          Luckily only in Murica.

          The liberal parties here tried to make the same argument here, but luckily no one takes them seriously (in Europe this means something different, than in the US. It’s not progressive/left-leaning, they are more like Libertarians/Republicans. They don’t hate gay people, but hate paying taxes and regulations)

          • マリウス@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            10 days ago

            Wait, who actually likes paying taxes?

            //edit: Forgot I’m on Lemmy. I’ll show myself out, comrades.

            • ugo@feddit.it
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              11
              ·
              11 days ago

              I do, mostly. Believe it or not, we do live in a society. Taxes and fees are integral to the well-being of the place you live in, from the small (apartment building, street, beighborhood) to the medium (city, commune) to the big (region, country).

              Public services need to be funded, and we fund them with taxes. I like paying taxes. What I hate is when those taxes get misused. What I hate is the CEO of my company, who last year made 300x what I made (and I make well above average salary) paying half the amount pf taxes I pay (percentage wise) because my money comes from salary and his comes from capital gains. What I hate is seeing homeless people around because you could build homes and give them to the homeless if the rich fucks were taxes properly.

              • coronach@lemmy.sdf.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                11 days ago

                Hear hear. I think it was Chomsky that said something like “we should all be celebrating tax day; that we don’t speaks volumes”

            • albert180@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              11 days ago

              People who are not too stupid or egoistic to see that good things happen with them?

              I love the awesome public transport network here, I love the good maintained hiking paths, I love that I can walk safe outside because of good social security. I love that all people have access to good healthcare here

    • snooggums@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 days ago

      Motherfucker loves trying to reinvent the wheel only to end up at the goddamn wheel.

      A shittier version of the wheel.

  • charade_you_are@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    11 days ago

    I must say, it’s been a little nicer not having this dipshit in the headlines every single fucking day. I guess he’s going to start saying things again and fuck with my peace of mind.

    I think Musk should 100% trust his fucking piece of shit robotaxi tech and use it exclusively. Good chance it drives him off a bridge.

    • blady_blah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 days ago

      When waymo was first getting qualified, they had human drivers too. Once they had so many miles, they quit needing the humans.

    • MBech@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      11 days ago

      Didn’t Waymo start with assisting drivers though? Like I get it, fuck this shitstain, but this seems like a very reasonable approach to self driving cars.

      • Step 1: Prove the concept in a closed environment.
      • Step 2: Prove the concept in an open environment, but with traning wheels in case something goes wrong.
      • Step 3: After extensive testing in step 2, full rollout of final product.
    • Lazhward@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 days ago

      That’s because Tesla self-driving takes a different, and imo way worse, approach.

      Waymo relies on mapping, the entire city is basically 3D modelled and loaded into the car memory. It’s more or less ‘on rails’. It also uses LIDAR for live data alongside imaging cameras, again building a 3D model of its environment combined with image recognition.

      Tesla decided that, for some reason, they want their cars to drive ‘like humans’, only relying on vision and deployable anywhere, without pre-mapping.

      Demanding a computer to behave like humans, instead of using a computer’s strengths, seems like a very poorly thought out move to me.

      • Victor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        11 days ago

        drive ‘like humans’, only relying on vision […] without pre-mapping.

        Demanding a computer to behave like humans

        So basically their taxis will go into the job of driving a taxi without any prior knowledge of the city? Like a human? Only relying on road signs? Will it also stop to ask for directions? Like wtf? What kind of stupid idea is this from Tesla. Sounds absolutely moronic.

        A human taxi driver doesn’t work like this. They are people who know the city very well going in, or at least used to before GPS navigation in vehicles came to aid.

        • brygphilomena@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 days ago

          He’s famously said that humans are good enough with just our two eyes. So he went the cheap route of not including lidar and relying on stereoscopic cameras.

          He’s an idiot. Because when I want stuff automated, I want it to be better than what a human can do.

          • Victor@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 days ago

            humans are good enough with just our two eyes

            This requires the car to have an equally sophisticated visual cortex as well, which we cannot achieve right now. Cars need those better sensors to equal our abilities.

            God, hearing his stupid arguments shows us he really knows nothing about anything.

  • jsomae@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    11 days ago

    I’m planning to launch a human-only taxi service, but to cut costs the humans will be AI.

    • einlander@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 days ago

      Didn’t Tesla choose not to allow Tesla vehicle lessee’s to not buy their cars so they can convert them to robo taxis and also software upgrade them so sell at a higher price in the certified pre-owned market?

      • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 days ago

        That was the initial plan but it hit a number of roadblocks.

        1. The release of the Robotaxi product was much delayed, and had Tesla kept to the “no buyout of leased cars” they would have been swimming in returned vehicles with nothing to do with them yet.

        2. The policy was put in place at a time when the autonomous hardware was thought to be the “final” version (referred to as Hardware 3). It turns out the “final” version wasn’t powerful enough, so a new final version was released (Hardware 4). So all the cars that were leased were not going to be useful as taxi cabs, so they offered those for sale to their leasers.

  • LousyCornMuffins@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    11 days ago

    yeah, totally not to keep the robotaxis from being molotoved. although after what musk did, not sure the presence of drivers will stop people.

  • albert180@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    11 days ago

    And only handpicked hardcore cult-members are invited for the “beta-phase”, and are invited to share their experiences via Video and Photo for Stock Pumping

  • net00@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 days ago
    • Will have a driver in the “robo” taxi
    • Will need to only run on specific area at specific time frame
    • Won’t run in “bad” weather
    • Has all other kinds of small rules and quirks.

    This seems like a complete waste of time for everyone involved.