1. Being dropped 500 years ago into your ancestors’ community.
  2. Being dropped 500 years into the future in your community.

You have a day to source some clothing appropriate to the time period. Unfortunately, that’s not enough time to learn a dialect.

  • Pons_Aelius@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Scenario 2 is where you would be outed as a time traveller.

    Scenario 1 is where you would be outed as a witch.

  • HenryWong327@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 year ago

    I mean this seems like an easy answer to me no? People in the past wouldn’t suspect you’re from the future, they’d think you were posessed or something. People in the future would be much more likely to think of time travel, plus they’d have records of old accents and stuff.

    • Neato@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Time travel to the future is interesting but not harmful. Time travel to the past is disastrous. But no one had concept if it do you’d be free to overwrite the future.

  • I think it would be pretty easy to blend into the future than the past. Though I don’t think in either case you’d necessarily be outed as a time traveler. The past, you’re a witch. The future, you’re just a crazy person.

    • Khanzarate@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Nah the future, you’re like your grandparents who don’t know how to Google, but so much worse. Technology has progressed so far, we wouldn’t recognize it, but it’ll have been taught from. Society will be so fundamentally different that we don’t even have the context to discuss it here. The past, we can make suppositions, and while some will be wrong, we have some idea of what it’s like, but the future, we’d be like a Napoleonic war veteran running out of gas in his car because he can’t read the dials, didn’t know what gas is, and can’t use a gas pump because he has no bank account and cannot open one without a social security card.

      • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Technology still needs to be designed to be used. Think of all the technology that still retains its basic form and only the material it’s made of significantly changing. The Boomers that call for annoying tech support questions are just refusing to learn a new skill.

        • toast@retrolemmy.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah, I don’t think spoons, and sandwiches, and socks are going to change that much. Most ‘tech’ changes a couple of times in a single lifetime (this was true even several hundred years ago), but the basics stay largely the same. Language is how they’ll catch you

          • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Who knows.

            Maybe sandwiches have been completely forgotten and you can make a nice little business out of making perfectly ordinary sandwiches.

  • pan_troglodytes@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    languages change over time but you can easily pretend to be mute

    1 - pretend while you learn the language

    2 - you’re fucked, future tech cured this centuries ago

  • Devi@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    So how about, you go to the future, look up a museum of your time, then just go and be yourself, like the people who do similar in museums now of the past.

    Either way though, unless time travel has become widespread in the future, you wouldn’t be outed, people would just straight think you’re a bit odd. There’s people now who straight up claim to be time travellers and we’re just like, OK mate, suuuure.

    • grandpaST@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      You may look more than a bit odd if you go to the past and someone notices the phone you forgot to remove from your jean pocket. Or you start making predictions like Nostradamus that are all accurate.

      • Devi@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think even then people are too skeptical. I could stand in Trafalgar square and start levitating and everyone will be like “Well done, clever trick!”

  • Stern@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think the language/dialect barrier would be a huge one in either case. To wit, the historical versions of the lords prayer- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Lord's_Prayer_in_English

    Future would be rough with a near complete lack of knowing current cultural norms, lingo, history, and knowing how the three seashells work. Top that off with all the stuff developed in just the past 100 years vs. the amount of progress we could be making in 5 times that length of time, and I feel like the future would be a lot rougher then the past.

    In the past you could excuse a minor faux pas by saying you didn’t get off the farm much and maybe folks would just think you were a bit slow. Not being socialized in the present or future? Bit less reasonable.

    • Neato@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You’ve got it. In 500 years we’ll never advanced so much and there will have been so much current exchange and drift I doubt you could be understood at all.

      In the 1500s you could get by as a foreigner who barely understood the language. You’d have zero cultural norms so most language that wasn’t literal would be unintelligible.

  • Fondots@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Which ancestor? I’m a mutt of several different European ancestries, I don’t speak a word of even modern Polish, Italian, or Albanian, let alone any archaic dialects, so I doubt they’re going to be able to sus out that I’m a time traveler, what they do make of me is up for debate, probably nothing good but I doubt they’d land on time traveler from the future. If I end up in one of my Irish ancestors’ villages, odds are they’re speaking Gaelic, but can probably find an English speaker somewhere who might catch on that my dialect is very unusual, though unless I do something to tip my hand about my future knowledge, I still doubt they’d suspect time travel. Scientific knowledge could be written off in different ways, and I don’t know enough 16th century history to really be able to say or do anything prophetic.

    If my goal is to avoid being outed as a time traveler, I can probably play dumb well enough not to tip my hand. They might assume I’m an idiot, insane, a witch, a demon, a fairy, etc. but I can probably avoid being outed as a time traveler.

    The future is harder, if time travel is a known technology/phenomenon, I imagine I’d be outted pretty quickly. If not, I suspect I’d probably be treated as insane or an amnesia patient or something, I can’t think of any reason they would assume I’m a time traveler unless I make it a point to bring it up, maybe if they run some blood tests and notice I’m missing immunity to common future diseases or radioactive contamination from WWII or something. Even then they would probably assume I’m a descendant of a secret bunker cult or something along those lines that wouldn’t break the laws of physics.

    • m4xie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Similarly, my ancestry ranges from Portugal to Estonia, and Sweden to South Africa (arriving in 1664, so they were Dutch 500 years ago).

  • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Depends if the future is Star Trek type utopia or Terminator style post rise of the machines.

  • Peekystar@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ancestors, since they’d be far more likely rationalise my bizarre present-day manner as being possessed by demons or something to that effect rather than assuming I’m from half a millennium in the future, I can’t say I have any specific guesses as to what the society of 2523 might look like, but I suspect that they’d be far more likely to jump to the somewhat improbable sci-fi explanation of time travel (or perhaps some other technological explanation like mind malware if brain implants become a thing) than assuming supernatural explanations of demons or witchcraft.

    • GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      On the other hand, 500 years ago you would probably be taken for insane or possessed if you accidentally spoke and/or acted as people do today.

      Back then that’s a high chance of getting burned on a stake or possibly lobotomized by some crude scholar experimenting on a perceived madman.

      In comparison in the future, provided mankind still exists, you’d be taken as an interesting walking anachronism to be studied. Maybe someone who gets to talk about life in the past at a university. But either way you’d most likely live a comfortable life of futuristic luxury in either a utopian post scarcity society, or kept as some feudal dilettante’s status symbol. Still better than dying of dysentery in the dark ages imo

  • Boozilla@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m thinking past could work better, as you could pretend to be mute or have a very limited vocabulary. Future could be anything and will probably have an uninhabitable atmosphere.

  • IonAddis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    In the past, I probably wouldn’t be found out, but I’d probably also die more easily. I’d have to be in Tudor England to even have a chance of speaking the language. If it was a dice roll of going to where “my ancestors” lived, I could end up anywhere in Europe, and parts of western asia and north africa.

    In the future, they might find me out, but I’d also probably have a much better time of surviving. I’d prefer to go to the future.

    A translator app on a phone could probably make heads and tails of my English dialect (I mean, they can do that today), and travel would be as fast as modern travel or faster, so once I identified a locale that I thought I’d like I could try to get to it. Basically, more opportunity would mean more options to be safe, and to survive.

  • lemmyseikai@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    So 500 years ago would put me just ahead of the warring states in Japan. Aside from me not speaking fluently, I am very well versed in sword.

    I think I come out okay.

    • grandpaST@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think you have the advantage there. Japan’s language and culture has been preserved better than many other civilizations.

  • livus@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    My ancestors are from at least 6 different countries and many of them spoke languages I can’t even really speak the modern equivalents of.

    I think as long as I remain mute people will just think I’m a simpleton or the local equivalent (since I don’t know how to work 16th century tech.

    In 500 years from now, presumably they will know that time travel has been invented so they will be more likely to suspect it.

  • Dr. Coomer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    500 years into the future. Far easier to adapt and hopefully the English dialect hasn’t changed severally or devolved into random internet jibberish.