• Yerbouti@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    19 days ago

    Today I made a joke about Donni on r/pic, nothing vulgar, just that he never touches his wife and I was instantly banned. Fuck Reddit

    • EnderWiggin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      20 days ago

      Found my way back to Lemy today as well for something similar. I’ve noticed just in the past few days the comment threads on even mundane threads have gotten really weird. It could be a post about a picture of a hummingbird and it would devolve into strange politics. Weird pro CCP and North Korea stuff lately too. It’s weird.

  • LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    20 days ago

    Freedom of speech doesn’t oblige anybody to publish anything on their own website that they don’t want to, any more than they’re required to say certain things if they’re shouting on a street corner. “But it’s not the same thing, a website has a much larger reach!” It doesn’t matter. Website operators get to publish what they want.

  • archonet@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    22 days ago

    “Reddit continues to be anti-free speech,” Cedric Hohnstadt said on X. “I just got a lifetime ban from the ‘comics’ subreddit. Yesterday, I posted a humor comic that got over 5,400 upvotes. Then I noticed that there was a pinned post from the moderators saying that comics linked from X could no longer be shared because Musk gave a Nazi salute. I commented saying no he didn’t. The moderator accused me of being pro-Nazi, banned me permanently for life, and deleted all my past posts from the ‘comics’ subreddit. But somehow Elon Musk is the totalitarian?” The post has been viewed 3.7 million times.

    Amazing that a blind man can draw comics.

    • JackbyDev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      21 days ago

      It sucks to get banned for life from somewhere you love for doing something you didn’t feel was wrong, but holy hell, Musk absolutely threw up a Nazi salute.

        • anomnom@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          20 days ago

          Anytime else think the second one has a bit of “uh oh, I did that, but can’t stop now” energy?

          Either that or he’d broken the seal and was comfortable with it by then. He probably practiced in the mirror before either way. The fact he hasn’t tried it again is encouraging that the criticism might be getting through anyway.

    • Otter@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      22 days ago

      The post has been viewed 3.7 million times.

      Assuming this is the info box in new Reddit, those stats always felt… wrong

      The difference between comments/votes and supposed “views” made it seem like the later was inflated.

      Even more obvious was when something got posted at odd hours of the night in a local community. The view count would take off shortly after, while the comments and votes would only show up around when people wake up.

  • scutiger@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 days ago

    Elon Musk Takes Aim at Reddit

    “This is insane,” Musk responded.

    Yep, totally taking aim at Reddit. Definitely not clickbait.

  • aquinteros@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    21 days ago

    it won’t be long before the piggy little fuckboy starts sucking on musk’s nipple and issue some sort of ban to that movement. god it’s good to be off that site

      • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        21 days ago

        By 2030 am that will be left to communicate will be billionaire owned social media, fediverse and 4chan. Oh, and IRC.

          • Maggoty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            20 days ago

            Yup, and it will be forever. You get a client and you connect to servers. It’s an open protocol.

            • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              20 days ago

              IRC is based. I hate that so many games these days only use discord. Such a bloated pile of shit when so many only use it to send messages.

        • Dizzy Devil Ducky@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          20 days ago

          Just wait until the rich realize they can just pay the government to immediately shut off all services that compete with them by then, at least in the States if nothing happens to stop them by then.

  • FelixCress@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    22 days ago

    one X user claimed the website was “anti-free speech” after he said he was banned from the “comics” subreddit for denying that the tech mogul did a Nazi salute

    That sounds like pro truth rather than “anti free speech”, no?

    • XIIIesq@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      22 days ago

      Free speech means having to read and hear things you don’t like or disagree with every now and again. I personally think bans should be restricted to hate speech or else we’ll sleep walk in to an echo chamber.

            • XIIIesq@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              21 days ago

              Opinion:

              a view or judgement formed about something, not necessarily based on fact or knowledge

              What’s your point? Other than trying to discredit me by insinuating I’m an idiot?

              I never thought that endorsing the freedom of speech would be so controversial!

                • XIIIesq@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  21 days ago

                  asks definition of a wordwhen given the definition moves the goal posts in an incredibly condescending way.

                  Why don’t you stop criticising me as a person and say what you want to say in plain English?

                  I take it you can’t articulate your problem with my argument and that’s why you have a problem with me instead.

            • XIIIesq@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              21 days ago

              Exactly the point, I don’t know why I’m struggling to get that across, apparently people get it when you say it!

          • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            21 days ago

            I should be allowed to play the drums in your bedroom at any time of the day or night I please and you’re not allowed to kick me out because freeze peaches

            • XIIIesq@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              21 days ago

              Invasion of privacy, breech of the peace, trespassing and probably more.

              Your terrible analogy has almost nothing to do with freedom of speech, if you think a redditor writing an opinion on Musk is equivalent to them playing the drums in your bedroom at night, you might be a tad sensitive.

      • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        20 days ago

        Nah, you don’t have a right to a space; that is, spaces have a right to police themselves. If you don’t like it, the cost to start your own community is virtually nill, and you can go ahead and refuse to moderate that community. That’s your choice and you’re free to make it.

        • slickgoat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          21 days ago

          Damn, now you got me defending fucking Musk on this issue.

          Freedom of speech is also the freedom to lie. However, that just means the state can’t arrest you for your speech. Nobody owes you a platform for your free speech.

          That said, Elon Musk is a turd sandwich.

          • FelixCress@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            21 days ago

            Freedom of speech is also the freedom to lie

            Again, it is not. Freedom of speech is a freedom to receive information and exchange ideas. Not a freedom to lie.

            Are you a USian by any chance? They quite often misunderstand what freedom of speech is.

            • XIIIesq@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              21 days ago

              Yes, but in this case we are not talking about a lie, we are talking about an opinion which you yourself consider a lie.

              It comes back to objective truth Vs opinion which I have already replied to you about.

              Regardless of this, there are cases where lying is protected by the first amendment.

              https://www.freedomforum.org/is-lying-protected-first-amendment/

              The example of where lying is not protected in the case to which we are referring would be:

              Be a provable assertion of fact (not an opinion)

            • slickgoat@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              21 days ago

              Again, it is.

              Show me the legalisation where it is illegal to lie. How is it enforced? Who enforces it? Who arbatrates it?

              Freedom of speech is a moral right, and nothing more. If you start arresting people on perceived lies, that is a very dangerous slippery slope. I hope that the Donald doesn’t start arresting people who he believes is lying. Where will THAT stop?

              And, no, I’m not Asian, tho I don’t understand your asking.

              • FelixCress@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                21 days ago

                Again, it is.

                Again, it isn’t. Read the fucking definition and educate yourself.

                ‘Freedom of speech is the right to seek, receive and impart information and ideas of all kinds, by any means.’

                https://www.amnesty.org.uk/free-speech-freedom-expression-human-right

                https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights

                And, no, I’m not Asian,

                Who was talking about Asians? I asked if you are a USian. Someone from USA. People from USA often misunderstand what freedom of speech is.

                • slickgoat@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  21 days ago

                  sigh

                  Again it is.

                  Neither of those links suggested that it was illegal to lie. Why not? Because it is fucking impossible to tie that rule into a working possibility. Go read your own links yourself, because it is obvious that you haven’t.

                  It talks about limitations on hate speech, etc, but you can lie without hate speech.

                  Freedom of speech is an ideal, and is tied to state control of speech. There are all kinds of limitations, including public safety and defamation, etc. But if I called you a Martian, obviously that is a lie. What happens? Does the free speech police lock me up?

                  I’m not interested in personal attacks, by the way.

          • _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            21 days ago

            No, freedom of speech doesn’t protect you against false statements. There’s literally a ton of other laws that penalize that, depending on the context. Purgery, slander, libel, breach of contract, just to name a few.

            • slickgoat@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              21 days ago

              I already said that there were limitations to free speech earlier. But untruth is also protected under the US Constitution. It all relates to a possibility of harm.

              If i said that I was the Easter Bunny, it would be a lie, but who is harmed by it?

              If I falsely yell fire in a crowded theatre and people get trampled, then harm, or a risk of harm is evident.

              These are all standard arguments on free speech. But, yes, there are many carve outs where an untrue statement is protected under law. I just don’t have the time or inclination to list them all. You can check them out yourself.

          • XIIIesq@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            21 days ago

            That’s true and I appreciate that different opinions are often unwelcome, I’d still rather that than end up in an extremely boring echo chamber where the “conversation” is not much more than a circle jerk.

        • Natanael@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          21 days ago

          In legal terms it is (with the obvious exceptions for impersonation, defamation, etc)

          But in private forums? Mods can be however strict they want

          • FelixCress@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            21 days ago

            It isn’t - unless your comment applies just to the USA, otherwise read the UN definition of freedom of speech.

            Are you a another USian by any chance? I noticed people from USA have completly skewed definition of freedom of speech which may partially explain why Trump is able to get away with his constant lies.

              • FelixCress@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                21 days ago

                Are you a little bit slow?

                Freedom of speech does not cover lies. It doesn’t mean lies are illegal - it only means they are NOT protected under the freedom of speech - which means they can be banned or made illegal if individual states decides to do so.

                Furthermore there is plethora of situations in which lies are illegal in multiple countries. As a matter of example, in the UK lying when you are selling something is called “fraudulent misrepresentation” and it is a criminal offence.

                • Natanael@infosec.pub
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  21 days ago

                  Tell me where scientists are prosecuted for having got a theory wrong

                  Tell me where meteorologists routinely are prosecuted

                  I already mentioned the obvious exceptions (lying to cause certain types of harm) but few western countries allow penalties for anything outside those exceptions

        • XIIIesq@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          22 days ago

          Well if this person truly believes it wasn’t a Nazi salute, then he’s not lying.

          I believe ghosts aren’t real, but that doesn’t mean I think anyone that has seen a ghost is lying, I truly believe that they think they saw a ghost.

          There’s a huge difference between an objective truth and a widely agreed upon opinion.

          • FelixCress@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            22 days ago

            Well if this person truly believes it wasn’t a Nazi salute, then he’s not lying

            Agreed, that makes him deluded instead. Not many people however are stupid enough to be able to analyse Musk salute and belive it wasn’t a nazi one.

            • XIIIesq@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              22 days ago

              I’m not getting in to the Musk debate, I’m quite frankly bored of it, just let me know if he does it again.

              I’m only here to defend freedom of speech.

          • notsoshaihulud@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            21 days ago

            It’s weird that this issue only comes up when it comes to defend nazi shit and not with other things. I’ll give you a specific example: I posted this on r/ShowerThoughts: “Incest is like pissing in your gene pool”. I think it’s pretty good, but mods deleted my post because it goes against community guidelines. If I got into an argument with the mods and got banned from r/ShowerThoughts, I wouldn’t be going around crying about “freedom of speech”, because it’s dumb, and communities have rules.

            These arguments are always about normalizing nazi shit. Fuck that.

            • XIIIesq@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              21 days ago

              The difference here is that you made a post against community guidelines. Where as in this case the guy seems to have been banned for wrong think.

              I’m not arguing that communities can’t have their own rules.

              • notsoshaihulud@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                21 days ago

                The difference here is that you made a post against community guidelines. Where as in this case the guy seems to have been banned for wrong think.

                Man, it’s such a shitty hill to die on.

                1. When I posted, there was no specific guidance on “incest jokes” at r/Showerthoughts that I am aware of.
                2. Normalizing nazi shit goes against most communities guidelines, somewhere around the general, “don’t post hateful stuff” requirements
                3. If communities can have their own rules, they are free to ban people for hateful shit.
                4. And yeah, Musk made a nazi salute, which at this point is a pretty objective fact (Tesla’s track record of racial harassment, EM’s track record of boosting nazi shit on X, EM renaming self as Kekius Maximus, talking about the “future of our civilization” while doing the gesture, repetition, and turning as per nazi protocol, etc etc.). The only things that are up for debate are A) why did he do it? B) Was he chemically impaired while doing it.

                Hear me out. Let’s remove the politics from this equation for a second

                Let’s say I stood on a podium, did pelvic thrusts and formed a V with my fingers stuck my tongue through them making circular motions with it, and when people got upset, I responded to with pussy jokes. Would you interpret my actions as an “awkward gesture”? You could, but people would consider you either a perv, or a troll. Same applies here.

                So yeah, stop normalizing nazi shit.

                • XIIIesq@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  21 days ago

                  People here seem to be confused between me endorsing “Nazi shit”, which I am not, and me backing the freedom of speech.

                  I don’t know why this is such a hard concept to grasp.

      • Jamablaya@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        21 days ago

        This place is already an echo chamber. Just try not agreeing with the party line.

      • Natanael@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        21 days ago

        Absolutely not you dimwit.

        I run a security related subreddit (cryptography). A false sense of security from wrong answers can literally kill

  • TootSweet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    22 days ago

    Reddit’s about to get shittier. Again. Either they’ll kowtow to Musk and make it against the rules to ban X links or they’ll give some bland, noncommital, centrist statement about how they respect the hard work their mods put in to keep Reddit going or whatever. I really doubt they’ll make any unequivocal statement condemning Musk as the neo-Nazi shitbag he is.