• nycki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    stronger products need less advertising, so an over-advertised product is likely inferior.

  • Presi300@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    That documentation is supposed to explain how a thing works to people who don’t know how it works. I know, sounds extremely obvious, but you’d be surprised how much documentation out there is written in a way, expecting you to already know what it’s talking about. No. I do not. It is the documentation’s job to explain ME what IT is talking about…

  • nicerdicer@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    When changing lanes or turning you are supposed to use the turning signal before doing the manouver. The turning signal is supposed to warn other drivers that you are going to do something. It doesn’t make any sense to use the turning signal when already mid-turning or while already changing lanes. Many drivers don’t seem to know that.

  • EleventhHour@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    That reality is not defined by our wishes, but by observable, verifiable facts.

    Sadly, a large amount of people cannot accept this.

  • reddig33@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    That you need to wash your hands after going to the bathroom. I’ve seen too many grown men walk straight out of the restroom after urinating.

    • Chaos0f7ife@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      I feel so nasty if I don’t wash my hands after using the bathroom.

      I’m not a germaphobe, but I refuse to touch bathroom handles. I will grab a paper towel and use it to turn on and off the faucet and open the bathroom door.

  • fireweed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Perpetual growth in a finite system is impossible, and anything that relies on perpetual growth to function is doomed to eventually fail.

    For instance: social services that rely on perpetual population growth (especially youth population; e.g. Japan/South Korea), companies that rely on perpetual increase in users (most publicly-owned companies; e g. basically every social media company ATM), industries that rely on perpetual advancements in technology (e.g. industrialized agriculture, which constantly needs new ways to fight self-induced problems like soil depletion and erosion), housing as wealth generation (to be a wealth generator it has to outpace inflation, but at a certain point no one will be able to afford to purchase houses at their inflated prices no matter how over-leveraged they get; e.g. Canada). [Note that these are merely examples where these issues are currently coming to a head; they are by no means special cases, they’re just in a more advanced state of “finding out.”]

    In other words, a lot of the modern world, in both public and private sectors, is built around a series of ponzi schemes.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      But you’re assuming the type of growth will never change.

      • population growth is not sustainable and we’re past that point, but knowledge growth is
      • resources growth is not sustainable and we’re past that point for many resources, but economies can grow independently of resources
      • Zacryon@lemmy.wtf
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        They literally said:

        Perpetual growth in a finite system is impossible

        I don’t see how your comment applies to that.

        Knowlegde growth may be sustainable, but it is also impossible to grow forever. (Supposing knowlegde is finite, which is, as far as I see it, the case as long as we make the definition of knowledge depend on characteristics like repition-free and new. For example, you could learn the number pi to even longer lenghts forever, but doing that is not necessarily something new to know as it’s just a manifestation of a repition which was already discovered.)

        I’m intrigued how you would explain that economies could grow independently of resources. From my perspective, it looks a lot like each and every form of economy relies somehow on some form of resource or resources. As resources are finite, economies can’t grow forever.

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          There are already trends showing economic growth disconnected from both resources and energy. Welcome to the service economy

          • Zacryon@lemmy.wtf
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Service needs workforce performing the service. Workforce are usually human resources. Thereby, limited again. Or did I get it wrong?

            • AA5B@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              We already have many cases where a very small number of humans can manage automated services for millions. It’s extremely scalable

              While you could argue the electronics and power are also a resource dependency, it again scales extremely well

  • lennybird@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    That we’d all be better off if we accepted our own fallibility. That we are not perfect little robots, and as a result more tolerance and forgiveness in the world is necessary.

  • boredtortoise@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    We should live more instead of wasting time at work but we can’t because we’re forced to get income to live

    • Technological_Elite@lemmy.oneOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Exactly. I’ve heard a “counter-argument” to this saying “I need to keep myself busy, I need to work.” Why not be able to optionally work more?

  • morrowind@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Any system that relies on people selling themselves will inevitably select for those who can sell themselves best, not any other metric

  • Chadus_Maximus@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Fundamental attribution error. Wanting something to happen ≠ believing it should happen. When wanting becomes believing, you are fucked.

    Too many people think that the world should bend the laws of reality to conform to their ideas. Gamblers are the prime example. They take something solvable by pure math and completely discard the solution, opting for a solution based on their wants instead of reality.

  • remotelove@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    *Lemmings. (I was going to use that as an answer to your post, but someone learning something new never gets me even the slightest bit miffed.)

    Most scam products like “power saver” plug-in modules for your home, fake ODB2 gas saver modules for cars or those little stickers for cell phones that are sold as “antenna boosters”. Also, anything that is marketed as a “detox” product will piss me off.

    All of those products are actively being sold on Amazon, EBay and at some other major retailers or in malls. They are openly sold because people refuse to learn that magic does not exist.

    Please. Stop buying these things.

    • OpenStars@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Fedizens?

      Kbin was a flop (at least in the direct sense), but Mbin and sometime Sublinks will be released allow federation with Mastodon and some other stuff, so this is more inclusive.

      Also Leftist Lemmies may become a thing, bc of all that about the origin of the code and supporting genocide in China (and sometimes Russia), so Fedizen avoids that?

      Are we… (Star Trek) Fedizens ✨? Learned (Loony?) Lemmites? We’ll decide at some point. :-P

    • Quazatron@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I know what you mean. It’s like a stupidity tax. Being ignorant makes you fall for those kinds of products and schemes. Ignorance is expensive.

  • smackjack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    That the start menu has a search bar. You would think that everyone would know this after almost 2 decades, but too many people still navigate through their computers like it’s 1998.

  • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    If the point of getting a job is so that you can eventually retire one day, and you know what you want to do when you retire, you should start doing what you want to do now while you can enjoy it.

    Similarly, If you feel like the place you were born in makes you unhappy, move to a different place. There are so many places.