and fuck the UK goverment

  • tal@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    87
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    That is, I believe, a British law that they’re following for users that appear to be in the UK. Not like they’re going to just disregard the law.

    kagis

    Yeah, the Online Safety Act 2023.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Online_Safety_Act_2023

    The Online Safety Act 2023[1][2][3] (c. 50) is an act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom to regulate online content. Designed to protect children and adults online, it passed on 26 October 2023 and gives the relevant Secretary of State the power, subject to parliamentary approval, to designate and suppress or record a wide range of online content that is illegal or deemed “harmful” to children.[4][5]

    The act creates a new duty of care for online platforms, requiring them to take action against illegal content, or legal content that could be “harmful” to children where children are likely to access it. Platforms failing this duty would be liable to fines of up to £18 million or 10% of their annual turnover, whichever is higher. It also empowers Ofcom to block access to particular websites.

    So that’s what they’ll be aiming to do.

    Some websites and apps stated they would introduce age verification for users in response to a 25 July 2025 deadline set by Ofcom.[47] These include pornographic websites,[48] but also the social networks Bluesky and Reddit.[49][50]

    Probably should be mostly irritated with Parliament.

    I expect that using a VPN that terminates in another country will avoid it, though I bet that then you can’t do things like buy Reddit Gold, if that’s still a thing.

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      62
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      I’d add that if you pick Ireland as the VPN exit country, it will have notable benefits:

      • Sites that pick language based on IP will probably do English.

      • It probably won’t add much latency.

      • Ireland isn’t too bonkers and hopefully won’t have any large collection of online laws of their own that become an irritant.

      • Because Ireland has a considerably smaller population than the UK, if people in the UK do this at scale for pornography, it will make the Irish statistically look like absolutely indefatigable horndogs, which I think will be pretty funny on visualizations.

    • lividweasel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 days ago

      If you don’t mind my hijacking, I’ve seen the term “kagis” used a number of times on Lemmy, possibly only by you but I think also others. Based on the usage, I assumed it was a Latin word to indicate some sort of transition or side-bar, but it seems to just translate to “you are”, which doesn’t make sense in context. Can I ask what it means?

      • mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        Kagi is a new-ish search engine that is popular among Lemmy users. Those users are trying to get it to catch on, and have started using kagi as a verb, the same way people say “let me google that really quick.”

        It honestly feels a lot like when Microsoft was trying to get Bing and their phone OS to take off, and started slipping product placement into popular TV shows. There was a brief time period in American TV, where characters had the disgusting line of “Bing it!” Usually while showing the Bing home page on a Microsoft Phone. It was just blatant ham-fisted cringey product placement.

        • Evkob (they/them)@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 days ago

          Yeah I’ve noticed this user basically inserts a “kagis” into like 2/3 of their comments, it always slightly irks me because it makes me feel like I’m getting advertised at. I’ve never felt the need to proclaim which search engine(s) I’ve used to research any particular comment on Lemmy, and I find it odd that the one person who does so regularly is doing it for a paid service.

          Apart from that, their comments are usually pretty good, so I’m not accusing them of shilling or anything, but I find it super peculiar.

      • Maven (famous)@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 days ago

        There’s a search engine named Kagi. It’s basically the equivalent of “googles” but for a different search engine.

  • AcidOctopus@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    9 days ago

    Lol yeah I’m not doing that. VPN all the way.

    Today I’m french.

    Tomorrow, who knows?

    The possibilities are endless.

    • sad_detective_man@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      9 days ago

      Too bad VPN server addresses are on-sight to reddit’s IP blocking strategy for years now. For whatever good internet choice you make, reddit reciprocates with an equally bad one

      • njm1314@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        9 days ago

        What’s funny about that is the VPN I use I saw advertised on Reddit. I wonder if these companies know that they ban users for using their products? Well I guess they don’t really don’t care.

        • Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 days ago

          Other companies: Thank you for buying from our sponsors! Here’s a code for 15% off!

          Reddit: You bought from our sponsors? Lol, you’re banned.

  • KoboldCoterie@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 days ago

    I wonder if they pay per verification. If so, I wonder how hard it would be to set up a script to just keep submitting new requests a few hundred or thousands of times a day with random photos…

      • KoboldCoterie@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        9 days ago

        Sure, it’s not about wasting their time; this says they’re using a 3rd party service to verify, so theoretically they’re paying for that service. It’s about wasting their money.

        • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          9 days ago

          Good point. I just think that if reddit would see an uptick in POC and old people with these random AI photos, it would be a weird and hilarious thing to happen to them. Spez is in awe of a nazi (musk) and old people would send their advertising into a tailspin.

  • Mothra@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    Does a vpn bypass it?

    Edit: btw yes I totally agree with you, I’m just wondering if that would be a workaround

      • 6nk06@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        9 days ago

        But Spez will still edit your comments. I don’t know how reddit has still some users left after that and the API train wreck.

        • Rhaedas@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 days ago

          Exactly. I get that there are still niches there that haven’t found their place here yet (be the change you want to see), but the only way I use Reddit now is through a search for things that find old information, since it is still a huge database of data (admittedly both good and bad).

  • 𝚝𝚛𝚔@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    If any service requires me to send a photo of myself to use it, I ain’t using it.

    EDIT: lol wut, Facebook and YouTube want photo ID now?? I must be old enough to have missed out. My comment stands though, if I wasn’t already a member on either of those I guess I wouldn’t become one!

  • archchan@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    8 days ago

    Age verification is insane in it’s entirety and no payment processor, corpo, government, or think-tank has any right to enforce their puritanical views on sex and Orwellian techno-fascist policies on everyone.

  • rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 days ago

    Damn, the website seems to be “with persona dot com” and holy fucking corpo.

    I say we all stay off the corporate internet and just come to places like this. Usenet is still a thing, but it’s all us binary kids now. Maybe we could go back to how it was in the '90s and actually chat on the platform. There’s IRC instead of Discord, message boards instead of Facebook.

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      Usenet is still a thing, but it’s all us binary kids now. Maybe we could go back to how it was in the '90s and actually chat on the platform.

      People stopped using Usenet for discussion in large part because of overwhelming spam problems and a lack of infrastructure to mitigate it.

      You could maybe build some sort of system to mitigate that.

      • Maybe automated text classification is good enough to do on a distributed level, on client machines, now. Problem is that automated text generation to try to defeat it has also probably improved, and I’d tend to bet on the spammers having the advantage.

      • Maybe an out-of-band mechanism to generate information about posts would work. Have Usenet clients support pulling a database of scores for current posts in a group. Like, have some server(s) that generates various types of scores (advertising, flameware, etc) text scores for posts. Can incorporate various human moderation in that scoring, maybe let an end user subscribe to one or more “moderators”, which I understand BlueSky does something like.

      Honestly, though, the Threadiverse mostly does what I want as a distributed discussion forum. I’m not sure what large benefits Usenet brings to the table relative to it.

      There’s infrastructure for posting large binaries, which the Threadiverse doesn’t really have short of (relatively small) image posting, but servers propagating the (large) alt.binaries hierarchy plus Usenet’s bandwidth-heavy “broadcast” style of post propagation is also what drove up the cost of running Usenet servers and forced them to generally go commercial. Eternal-september.org is one of the very few remaining free-as-in-gratis Usenet servers, and they don’t propagate alt.binaries. And I’d expect that Parliament would crack down on commercial Usenet operators if the Act doesn’t already do so and Usenet sees a major surge in popularity in the UK for the pornography that this is trying to block; payment processors are necessary for commercial service, and easy for countries to lean on as leverage. If you want the ability to post large binaries in a state-censorship-resistant way, I’d probably…hmm. If a state wants to leverage its control of the network infrastructure to block access, it can make access pretty difficult. Maybe use Hyphanet (previously known as Freenet) for the files, then use magnet-style links on a more latency-friendly forum for discussion.

    • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      Message boards are closing or blocking the UK because of this. We even lost lemmy.zip in the UK. But the way lemmy works means you could access it from other instances. Probably illegal in the UK but as long as people are ok with spinning up instances and telling the UK to get fucked it will probably be fine.

  • markovs_gun@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    8 days ago

    What I don’t understand is that there are ways to prevent kids from looking at porn that don’t rely on crazy shit like this, even if they do involve some government action. Having to send a picture of your face to a porn provider to view porn is the dumbest possible way to fix this. I suspect the real reason for all of this is people want to effectively ban porn altogether and dumb fucks are letting them.

    • Psythik@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      8 days ago

      Having to upload your ID anywhere is already sketchy as-is, let alone a porn site. What ever happened to the days of “never use your real name on the internet”? Computer class teachers would drill that into students’ heads all the way through K-12.

      When Facebook came along, I thought people were insane for posting things under their full name with their photo attached to it. I thought MySpace was asking for too much personal info as-is! Fast forward ~20 years, and not only are you expected to provide your real identity on several websites, some American states even require it now!

      Honestly blows my mind how willingly we gave up our online anonymity without even the slightest bit of pushback. We all just accept it as normal now.

      • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        FB has a very aggressive data mining verification for making an account, they don’t even let you use some obscure emails to registet

    • Quokka@mastodon.au
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 days ago

      @markovs_gun @Abraxas Kids are being banned from all social media here in Australia soon. Including, it seems, YouTube lol.
      Expensive and completely unworkable. Reminds me I must spin up that Mastodon instance for my kids and their mates :mastodondance:
      It’s absolutely not about making sure everyone signs up to DigitalID.

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 days ago

      It’s going to be interesting to see if, after Britons become accustomed to letting websites take pictures of their identity documents, whether there will be interesting fraud attempts made on the British public from other websites who claim that they are conforming to British law.

  • LSNLDN@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    8 days ago

    Yeah I hate this. Glad I’m not using it much anymore anyway but damnnnn. I’m convinced they’re rolling this out under the guise of child safety but with the profit motive of data harvesting for their donors

      • deranger@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 days ago

        Nobody has created some sort of fake virtual camera thing? Like it appears in device manager as a real webcam, but the output is altered?

        • tal@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          9 days ago

          I’d assume that this is something that can be most-easily bypassed at the browser level if a site can request access to a camera.

          I don’t think that any trusted-to-the-camera hardware stack exists today.

          But at an OS level…

          I dunno about Windows, but Linux can do virtual video-4-linux devices, which is probably how the OS exposes a camera to a browser on Linux.

          https://github.com/v4l2loopback/v4l2loopback

          This module allows you to create “virtual video devices”. Normal (v4l2) applications will read these devices as if they were ordinary video devices, but the video will not be read from e.g. a capture card but instead it is generated by another application.

        • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 days ago

          Then you cannot access it, same as how you can’t sign up to OF as a creator or any online govt services. Most of those don’t even let you use a PC, only a phone, via an app that checks your phone for root, same as banking apps. Were you born yesterday?

        • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 days ago

          Have you never done one of these for an ID check? Doesn’t work like that, it will likely ask you to turn your head so it can take a “3D” scan.