• Euro@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    83
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Email, as far as im aware there isn’t some alternative email standard (messaging services, whatsapp, signal, sms, etc do not count imo as I believe they serve a different purpose than email)

    DNS, while there are alternative root servers, they still fundamentally rely on the dns protocol.

    TCP/IP, when the internet was first starting, this was not the only standard in use, but now it is (to my knowledge).

    I thought about this for longer than I should’ve for a comment on a random post, but this is all I could think of lol.

    edit: grammar

    • jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      TCP/IP isnt the only standard in use even today. UDP/IP is the other big one and there’s a few smaller protocols hanging around like utp.

    • ch00f@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      49
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yeah just don’t pay too close attention to the unofficial power delivery protocols.

    • henfredemars@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      2 months ago

      My main complaint about USB is the cables. There’s no way of knowing what standards and data speeds the cable may support.

      • cynar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        They’ve not at least released a standard set of markings. Basically, the data speed in Gb and the power capacity in Watts will be printed on the connector. Whether chinese suppliers will bother complying is another matter.

  • jimmux@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Toilet paper rolls.

    Somehow we settled on a pretty good size for toilet rolls, and there never seems to be a compatibility issue with holders.

    At least not for households. Commercial products have their own things going on, but it doesn’t affect most people.

    Is there a formal standard, or did we decide not to mess with good enough?

    • Machinist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 months ago

      We’ve got a 100 year old toilet roll holder, the spindle was turned on a lathe and the wooden cutout it sits in was hand carved. It is a poor fit for modern high sheet count rolls. We can’t stand to get rid of it so we just leave the roll outside of it until it is small enough to fit.

  • Zarxrax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    2 months ago

    The way I see it, it’s not so much an issue of making something that’s better than the other standards. It’s really about getting your standard into actual use and hitting critical mass which makes all the other standards irrelevant.

  • DomeGuy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    2 months ago

    When the standard is a big interoperability push that leverages MORE functionality as a bribe to be implemented.

    This is how USB (plug & play!), Bluetooth (wireless headset!), HDMI (high def, single cable!) , and USB-C (both sides are good!) all beat the entrenched pseudo standards.

  • superkret@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    You can avoid the issue when a government just mandates one standard, ideally after consulting with experts on which is the best.
    See: USB, SCART, etc.

    • renzev@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 months ago

      A lot of people seem to be opposed to this argument, seeing it as a kind of government overreach, but I think it can work if done correctly. Things like USB and HDMI are already governed by collectives of companies, I think having the government work together with them can be beneficial for both consumers and producers alike.

      • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        non standard conforming cables, and connectors, plus the entire mess of it supporting anything from power only, to usb 2, to usb 3, to thunderbolt 3, to thunderbolt 4? and usb 4.0 now.

        It’s an utter fucking disaster of a shithole.

  • Blaze (he/him)@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 months ago

    I see this one quoted a lot when discussing Lemmy communities migration/consolidation/split.

    I don’t think it really works that well for forums. Some communities have clearly taken over others (see [email protected] vs [email protected] recently). It’s not standards competing, it’s people going where the activity happens.

  • AA5B@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    For home automation, Matter/Thread has the potential. We’ll see over the next five years, but yes market forces can make a new standard work

    Reasons I’m hopeful

    • this is the first time major companies are involved: Apple, Google, Amazon agree
    • first time home automation hubs “just happen”, with the millions of people who have Echo, Google Home, Apple devices
    • small companies that dominate home automation seem to realize the problem of the market can’t reasonably expand without interoperability and ease of use

    Matter/Thread is the new kid on the block. Will it be yet another home automation standard, or will it gradually replace the previous ones? We’ll see.

    • nightofmichelinstars@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Also, playing cards. Every casino and basement house party uses the same 52 card deck. It’s sold in airports all over the world.

  • GamingChairModel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 months ago

    Networking standards started picking winners during the PC revolution of the 80’s and 90’s. Ethernet, with the first standards announced in 1983, ended up beating out pretty much other LAN standard at the physical layer (physical plugs, voltages and other ways of indicating signals) and the data link layer (the structure of a MAC address or an Ethernet frame). And this series of standards been improved many times over, with meta standards about how to deal with so many generations of standards through autonegotiation and backwards compatibility.

    We generally expect Ethernet to just work, at the highest speeds the hardware is capable of supporting.

    • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      networking standards were a mess before ethernet really fucking cooked with twisted pair wiring.

      Ethernet had already existed for a little bit prior to this, and most other alternatives were actively being worked on at the time, and relatively similar to ethernet, save for the general technical implementation, token ring as opposed to the funny broadcast meta. But when ethernet was able to just barely get ahead and use twisted pair, the entire thing came crumbling down and everyone agreed that ethernet over twisted pair, with switched star topology was the best.

  • moakley@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Not exactly this, but it reminds me of my first job. I used to work in finance, and I was given the task of automating cash flow reports that were sent out to hundreds of clients.

    The problem was that they were made manually in Excel, and most of them were unique. So every couple years they’d get a bunch of smart people in a conference room, and tell them to figure out how to automate the cash flows. The first step was always to create a standard cash flow template, and convince everyone to adopt it.

    Some users would adopt the new template, but most of them would say that the client didn’t like it, so they’d stop using it and the project would fall apart.

    By the time I got there, there were still hundreds of unique cash flows, but then there were a few dozen that shared the same handful of templates, like a graveyard of failed attempts to automate this process.

    I just made the output customizable. The reports looked the same as what the client was used to, but it saved hundreds of man hours for the users. A lot of people got laid off.

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Whenever the new standard hits the almost impossible golden triangle of “cheap, reliable, and fast”.

    It’s gotta be cheaper than the alternatives, better and more reliable than the alternatives, and faster/easier to adopt than the alternatives.

    Early computers for example had various ways to chug math, such as mechanical setups, relays, vacuum tube’s, etc.

    When Bell invented their MOSFET transistor and figured out how to scale production, all those previous methods became obsolete for computers because transistors were now cheaper, more reliable, and faster to adopt than their predecessors.

    Tbf though transistors are more of a hardware thing. A better example of a standard would be RIP being superceded by BGP on the internet.

    • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Tbf though transistors are more of a hardware thing. A better example of a standard would be RIP being superceded by BGP on the internet.

      another big example is the telecom companies being superseded by IP based networking, rather than whatever patch routing bullshit was previously cooked up.

      Sometimes certain solutions are just, better.