I already use Firefox for browsing normally, but I have to test on a Chromium based browser too. One soft requirement is that it should be installable with Flatpak on Linux.

  • Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 year ago

    Unless something’s changed recently, you can just install the Chromium browser itself. And it looks like it’s available as a Flatpak. As a bonus this will eliminate anything extra added by browser manufacturers as a potential problem.

    • hperrin@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes. I’ve considered that, but does it still report back to Google? Even though that majority of what I visit will be “http://127.0.0.1:8080”, I’d still rather not be spied on by Google.

        • hperrin@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          I though that was Linux only, but I just looked it up and it is also available on Mac.

          It’s not available on Windows, but I’m ok with that.

          I will add that to the list to try out.

          • Empricorn@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’m confused. In your initial post, the only OS you mentioned was Linux:

            One soft requirement is that it should be installable with Flatpak on Linux.

            But you don’t use/want a Linux browser…?

            • hperrin@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I mostly code on Linux, but I also code on Mac, since I have to test on Safari. I don’t really ever code on Windows. Windows exists on a separate disk in my computer just to boot into every 3 or 4 months when I release a new version of a desktop app and need to build for Windows.

              So I want a browser that at least works on Linux and Mac. What I meant in my post was I wanted it installable through Flatpak rather than a snap or deb, since I use Fedora.

      • Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        It does phone home, but with the right DNS settings you can block that. Heck, if you’re just going to localhost you can disconnect the machine from the network entirely.

  • lars@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I use Vivaldi because of it’s tab management.

    I have it configured to put the tabs in a bar on the right side of the screen. That way you have full tab titles no matter how many you have open.

    It’s also got a tiling window manager. So you can select two tabs and tell it to split screen them within the single window of Vivaldi. Or select 3, or 4, or whatever and put them in a grid. All sorts of options.

    I’ve got big 4k monitors, so I’ve grouped up some pinned tabs to always be tiled (like my email and calendar)

    It’s got lots of other nice tab features and just regular features, but those are the main selling ports for me personally.

        • hperrin@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah, this is a contender. No Windows build and no sync are the downsides, but neither is a deal breaker, since I’m only testing with it, and I code on Linux and Mac.

          • jiberish@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            If you’re using Windows, Edge is an option. You already have the Microsoft telemetry watching you regardless of using Edge, so you might as well use it if you need chrome for testing or a specific website.

        • hperrin@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Yes. https://www.chromium.org/Home/chromium-privacy/

          But not nearly as many tracking mechanisms as Chrome, because it lacks API keys for some services. By default, it will still send the URL of every page you visit to Google, though. At least that’s my understanding, reading their privacy policy.

          But it also doesn’t update itself, doesn’t seem to have a working Mac build (the one on their website doesn’t launch), and doesn’t sync (which I can live without, but end-to-end encrypted sync is nice).

  • Granixo@feddit.cl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The best Chromium browser in terms of compatibility is of course Google Chrome.

    The best in terms of privacy is Vivaldi. (and i hate Vivaldi).

    • hperrin@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I haven’t tried Vivaldi. Is it available on Linux?

      Edit: Looks like they do with both .deb and .rpm packages. They’re not on Flatpak, but the rpm would work for me on Fedora.

    • VodkaSolution @feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Thanks, I’m gonna give it a try, but I’m a bit confused: why are there a public, webview and shell version to download (android)?

  • indepndnt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I just saw someone on Mastodon saying they replaced Chrome with Vivaldi, so maybe that?

    • hperrin@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Their latest thing that pushed me to look for a new testing browser is installing a system wide VPN on your computer without your consent.

  • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think there’s no good option. Your best bet is probably to run chrome in some sort of temporary vm so there’s nothing worth tracking. Maybe there’s a docker image with chrome ?

    • hperrin@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is awesome! Thank you.

      Unfortunately, based just on this, Brave seems to be the best, but there’s additional stuff in Brave that makes it much less appealing.

      • geogle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        They have a Mac version and a Windows beta, but I don’t think there’s one for Linux available yet.

        • hperrin@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I didn’t know that! Awesome! I hope there’s a Linux version soon, then I’ll probably switch to it.

  • kuneho@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    if you use Windows and want to have Chrome, why not just use Edge? It’s just conveniently therr, you need nothing to install.

    It works with everything that “needs” chrome.

    edit: one comment gave me the idea you use Windows but now I’m not sure in it. if not, then sry, ignore this comment :)

    • hperrin@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I don’t use Windows much, but Edge is available on Mac and Linux. I’m just not a fan of all the “features” they put in it. I’m looking for more of a clean browser experience, if you get what I mean.

      • kuneho@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think you can’t go more clean than Chromium. Pretty sure all browsers based on Chromium has some extra features, since those are the only differences in them. Vivaldi, Brave, Maxthon etc…, the same engine in different car, with different extras.

        this is why I usually recommend people to use Edge if they really want Chrome, since on Windows, it’s already there. But yeah, on Linux, I wouldn’t really tell anyone to apt install edge.

    • Diabolo96@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I’ve been using it for a few months now and it’s great. Firefox is my main browser but a chromium based one is good to have. Wonder why it asks for my password every now and then but think it’s likely auto update stuff.

      • Knusper@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh, I rather doubt it.

        It is built on top of Qt, so I assume, theoretically, it wouldn’t be terribly difficult to do the port, but you need someone who regularly tests+fixes it under macOS. And well, it’s a non-commercial project, so you need someone who volunteers to do that…

        • hperrin@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The KDE team is awesome, and they already have Mac devs. So maybe if people show support for it, they’d do it. :)

          • Knusper@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Possible, yeah. Falkon was previously an independent project (QupZilla). I don’t know how much they’ve intermingled with the other KDE devs yet, but that’s certainly no insurmountable problem either.