• credo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      Problem is, this is the education people need before it happens. Critical thinking. Once it’s part of their identity everything you say is just a lie aimed at dismantling what they “know” to be true.

      Unfortunately republicans have been destroying education for decades, and Fox news and AM radio have been preying on the weak minded for just as long.

    • mrdown@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      Lies and defending the undefendable should definitely be censored otherwise they multiplies

      • LunatiQue Goddess @lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        No one said lies, I said opinions. Like your opinion of what’s undefendable will not be exactly the same to every other person opinion of what is undefendable.

        If something is accused of being a lie, the accusation should come with evidence. If proven to be a lie then of course take it down. However if my favorite color is teal and I take down someone’s post for saying their favorite’s indigo; then that is censorship based on bias, and should not be allowed.

        The OP asked about combating propagandist. This can be anyone. Propagandist are of any ideology, theology, social group, culture. I feel my original answer is very healthy advice.

        • mrdown@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          9 days ago

          No one said lies, I said opinions. Like your opinion of what’s undefendable will not be exactly the same to every other person opinion of what is undefendable.

          By the undefendable I mean stuffs like neo Nazism , settler colonialism, intentionally murdering innocent civilians etc. Those are not matter of opinions

          • LunatiQue Goddess @lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 days ago

            How crude. A Nazi isn’t an opinion but Nazis would have opinions, as all people have opinions. What differentiates this, however, is that that being a Nazi is an action. They act out, have things they physically do, like cause harm.

        • Daftydux@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          9 days ago

          I liked it but my criticism is it is binary. Like in a shouting match the only way to win is to shout louder.

                • Daftydux@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  9 days ago

                  I say, love the propagandist. Not their propaganda. Love them as a person. Understand their ideology comes from a place of hurt. Make them want what you have. A settled mind and a clean soul. Im not saying you can change them but I’ll listen to the person who can defuse a shouting match over the people shouting, every time.

                  The goal wouldn’t be to swoon the propagandist to your side. It would be to take away their power. That power comes from people listening. If you can expose them to be consumed by only their own opinion you take that power away.

                  Also, disengage. We are scared, terrified, of words. They provoke us, and we give them power. Stand tall on your own morals and let the waves crash on your shores. Dont get swept to sea every time a storm is raging.

                  You can laugh now.

                  • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    9 days ago

                    I’m kinda thinking that your strategy is too expensive. Like, you say

                    I say, love the propagandist. Not their propaganda. Love them as a person.

                    In my opinion, love is expensive and a lot of people simply can’t afford it, i.e. they don’t have the emotional carrying-capacity that it takes. You need a lot of patience to deal with difficult people, and i mean a lot of it. Ain’t nobody got the time for that.

                    I wonder how economics plays into this. Anyways, any strategy that works must respect the economics of the game and be at least somewhat efficient overall. For example, shutting out news media from your field of vision and only listening to local news that your neighbors tell you (as i explained in another comment in this thread) is more efficient because you waste less time going through the potentially infinite amounts of bullshit that “news” media throw at you, and instead give you more time to focus on your local community; one where you will actually be rewarded if you make it thrive, because you’re more directly affected by it.

                  • LunatiQue Goddess @lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    9 days ago

                    Your take is magnitudes greater than others who are combative and hostile. If people could comprehend instinctively what is propaganda and not fall victim to it. Your idea would be great. That’s the only thing preventing it. Most people have to be able to understand what propaganda is