It’s a relevant comment on posts that include Trump. I’m not AI, nor a bot. They’re legit comments. Just because people don’t like the frequency doesn’t make it less important and it’s not spam.
Unless the user above you literally has the Epstein files in their possession and is seeking opinions about whether to release it, how exactly is telling someone to release the files in any way a “direct response to the subject matter?@
I’m not against banning this manchild from petulantly spamming and gleefully “debating” with infantile retorts —though none of us actually believe he’ll not just create a new account to start again.
edit: I’m blocking his dumbass from my feed, at the very least. Please, mods, take it further. Your communities rely on wiser heads to prevail.
It’s a relevant comment on posts that include Trump. I’m not AI, nor a bot. They’re legit comments. Just because people don’t like the frequency doesn’t make it less important and it’s not spam.
But it’s the exact same comment on so many posts. It doesn’t need to be a bot or AI doing the posting for it to be spam.
I understand you feel it’s relevant and important, but what you are doing is pretty much the definition of spamming.
Yet, it’s not.
do you know what spamming means?
Meaningless messages posted on irrelevant subject matter.
This is not Spam.
Release the Trump/Epstein files
What a weird way to spend your time. I kind of wish you were a bot or ai, it’d be less sad.
Tis better than dealing with other people’s emergencies. My down time is good for others.
Fits the definition as far as I can see.
Nah. Definitely not by those standards.
spam /spăm/
noun
They’re not unsolicited. They are a direct response to the subject matter of the posts that I reply.
Unless the user above you literally has the Epstein files in their possession and is seeking opinions about whether to release it, how exactly is telling someone to release the files in any way a “direct response to the subject matter?@
I mean, you can say that, but without a clear line of argument explaining why that’s the case, I remain unconvinced.
I’m not against banning this manchild from petulantly spamming and gleefully “debating” with infantile retorts —though none of us actually believe he’ll not just create a new account to start again.
edit: I’m blocking his dumbass from my feed, at the very least. Please, mods, take it further. Your communities rely on wiser heads to prevail.
Your opinion is irrelevant. If you’re a mod and want to ban me from your groups, so be it.