I hate Microsoft and Windows, I want to choose better AND more importantly, see what all this fuss about Linux being awesomest is about

  • stoy@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    9 days ago

    IT guy here, I mostly work with Windows, but have daily driven Linux in the past and am planning on switching back to Linux when Windows 10 goes EOL.

    Anyway, here are my thoughts.

    Ubuntu - simple to use, but has a history of doing their own thing to the detriment of the user. Currently pushing their own alternative to Flatpaks, Snaps, which is built around centralizing apps around Canonicals servers.

    Mint - similar to Ubuntu in terms of use, based on Debian, well known and seemingly working well. Good starting point for everyone.

    Fedora Linux - easy to use, more standard Linux than Ubuntu, based on Red Hat, focused more on using the latest tech when compared with Mint and Ubuntu.

    Manjaro - for the more experienced users, based on Arch, modern, but a bit more unstable than the other distributions mentioned here.

    There are other’s but few that I have actual experience with and can be called newbie friendly, so it would be unfair to add distributions I don’t have experience with.

    • RedGreenBlue@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      If you choose Arch, you can say “I use Arch btw”, from time to time, in unrelated conversations. That is a plus and should be considered.

      • gigachad@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 days ago

        This is true, but I see “I use Mint btw” appearing more and more in the wild during the last year.

        I use Mint btw

      • stoy@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 days ago

        It is based on Ubuntu, so I expect it to be easy to use, I don’t know if it uses Snaps nor not, if it does, I would avoid it.

      • Toes♀@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 days ago

        PopOS is very old I would recommend against it to anyone not already stuck with it.

        • theherk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 days ago

          PopOS was only initially released in 2017, making it one of the newer distributions. It is actively developed and really pushing the needle in the community. It is a great option. Don’t know what distro you’re actually thinking of, but it isn’t Pop.

          • Toes♀@ani.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 days ago

            Let me explain, the current version of pop is based on the 22.04 branch of Ubuntu. They’ve been in dev hell trying to update to the 24.04 branch.

            As a consequence it doesn’t have full support of more modern hardware and you can run into libc issues trying to run precompiled binaries.

            • theherk@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              9 days ago

              Fair enough, but assuming you’re using any of several package managers, seems like libc shouldn’t be an issue. Nevertheless, I clearly misunderstood you. Anyway, alpha 7 for 24.04 is out now.