Betty Sue makes $286,000 per month on Etsy. She started with nothing, and now she’s filthy rich.

Come on, man. The chances of that happening to the average person are close to zero. Stories like this give people unrealistic expectations.

  • hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 month ago

    First of all, the vast majority of media cares only about crafting and publishing stories that people want to read, instead of stories that people should read. Think about clickbait articles. Their purpose is to get people to read the story and therefore give them money (either by seeing ads, buying a physical magazine/newspaper, or signing up for a paid subscription), as oppised to actually informing the public about things they should know

    Second, capitalism needs the working class to think that they can get rich too if they just work hard, and thus people spend their lives working because they’ve been told that they can get rich. Allow me to illustrate:

  • Electric_Druid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 month ago

    People are more likely to accept an inherently flawed economic system if they thing they have any chance of “beating” it. Stories like this, although actually very rare, help reinforce that narrative.

    • MrMcGasion@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I have had someone tell me that they’d rather live in an economic system “like we have in America” where people have a chance at rags to riches, than a system “like Germany, where the social safety net means the average person doesn’t have a chance at making it big.”

      If anyone ever tells you wealthy people are intelligent, don’t believe them.

    • aesthelete@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Yep, many also think they’re exceptional, and so they’ve convinced themselves they’ll be the exception.

  • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 month ago

    Gotta keep the American dream alive.

    Give people hope.

    People with hope don’t revolt because they still have something to lose.

  • Angel Mountain@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 month ago

    People like to read those stories because it gives them hope it also happens to them. Media print stories that you want to read, that’s how they make money.

    Other stories people like to read: how to world is going to shit (evolutionairy important to prepare to survive), what someone that’s familiar to you did (evolutionary important to be social to work together to survive), stories about how someone else did something stupid (complaining about that toghether gives yoh a sense of belonging) and stories about how a pet cat was retrieved (tickling that instinct to care for others again).

    As you can see, media is looking for stories that tickle your most basic insticts and needs, because they know that’s what you will be interested in, making you read their stories so they can make more money.

    Welcome to capitalism, you are the product.

  • FireTower@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 month ago

    The chances of that happening to the average person are close to zero.

    That’s the whole point. People don’t watch the news to hear “dog bites man” they watch it to hear “man bites dog”.

    No one wants to watch a 2-3 hr long movie about someone’s regular Tuesday at the office they want to watch something that doesn’t happen everyday like an adventure, the perfect couple meeting, or the world ending.

  • 2ugly2live@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Gotta keep that dream alive. Besides, why would I want to tax the rich when I’m this close to being rich myself! /s

  • khaleer@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Because people would believe them instead of taking actions against the billionaires.

  • ShareMySims@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Capitalist propaganda.

    “Aspiration” to be more precise, it’s one of the ways capitalists convince large segments of the public that they’re temporarily embarrassed millionaires, who just need to pull their bootstraps up hard enough, and they will make it, like the people in the programme did (conveniently they never address things like racism, sexism, queerphobia, ableism, and other barriers that many people have to face just to survive, never mind thrive, and the fact that all of these barriers are artificial and created by people who benefit just as much from dividing society up and pitting us against each other, as they do from selling us rags-to-riches bullshit to get us to work harder to make them money).

    • Kintarian@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I’ve never understood “pull yourself up by your bootstraps,” which is impossible. No matter how hard you pull, you can’t, say, jump a fence. The rich are inadvertently telling poor people that becoming rich by working hard is impossible.

      • ShareMySims@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        I think that’s the point, just like with “a few bad apples”, the original intent of the saying has been subverted to help those in power keep the rest of us down (if you just do this impossible thing, you’ll be just like us! Why don’t you just do that impossible thing already, you useless lazy bastard? And so on. It’s part cognitive dissonance to make themselves feel like they’re “self made”, part gaslighting convincing us we’re just not trying hard enough).

  • ContrarianTrail@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Isn’t that the case with all news? When a self-driving car kills a person it’s newsworthy but the million times it doesn’t is not. By definition the event needs to be something out of the ordinary for it to spark the interest of most people.

    • Kintarian@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      They use sensationalism to make things sound worse than they are.

      They selectively report information, leaving out details that don’t fit their agenda.

      They use misleading headlines, knowing that people often only read the headlines. They use words like “horrifying,” “catastrophic,” and “viral.”

      They manipulate charts, graphs, statistics, and photographs.

      Balanced reporting isn’t balanced if it pits a scientist against a conspiracy theorist.

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    To pacify you by convincing you that you could be next, as opposed to you are regularly fucked by the rich.