

Not liking what I’ve seen from the moderation lately.
Not liking what I’ve seen from the moderation lately.
The problem is that a lot of these startups don’t make money. The enshittification comes later, first stage is just burning through VC cash to establish market share.
The solution is if you’re sending a mass email that shouldn’t be replied to you use BCC. So it’s really the sender’s fault
Outlook does give a warning now if you’re sending to a distro list
I posted a thing from 8 bit theater and it got a lot of upvoted. Definitely old people.
Bras are bad enough, now I have to learn how to take off a hauberk?
Looks like a projection set, so no, they’re pretty bad for games.
I know baseball does this in the US. Dunno about football.
Pixel 7 pro here. They’re overpriced at release but if you’re willing to buy last year’s model they’re pretty good.
Work in software project management. People swear pretty regularly. The higher up in the hierarchy you go, the more they swear. If a job gave me a warning for that I might leave because they treat their employees like children.
They look like work/gardening gloves, so it’s conceivable that the owners leave these outside. Cat might just be plundering nearby yards.
I mostly sit down when I pee because my cat likes to spend quality time when I’m on the toilet and he gets upset if into in the bathroom and don’t sit down.
Remember manliness is not caring about how other people define manliness.
Nah everything is a conspiracy.
I’m pretty sure it’s less that you can crack the DRM on the newer format and more that you can get amazon to send you a version that’s compatible with older devices (which uses the older DRM).
That’s true for the older Kindle format but not the newer one.
Just a few years ago you weren’t downvoted just because someone disagreed with your opinion.
Yeah, no, “downvote is jot a disagree button” has always been aspirational on reddit.
Spent enough time in the punk scene to know some people are very serious about it.
I don’t know honestly. Really, with AI it would be pretty difficult to be foolproof. I’m thinking of the MIT card counting group and how they played as archetypal players to obscure their activities. You could easily make an account that upvoted content in a way that looked plausible. I’m sure there are many real humans that upvote stories positive to one political party and downvote a different political party. Edit: I mean fuck, if you wanted to, you could create an instance just to train your model. Edit 2: For that matter, you could create an instance to bypass any screening for botters…
If there were, upbotters would use it to verify that new bottling methods weren’t detectable. There’s a reason why reddit has so much obfuscation around voting and bans.
No porn is appealing. Nothing against porn but I read Lemmy in public a lot and i hate playing whack a mole with nsfw communities.