• capital@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    5 months ago

    he can have power of people in a business context, which is always morally good

    Man, what???

  • Vytle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    5 months ago

    This dude really looked at fucking Adolf Hitler and said “man, he’d make a great CEO”

  • pachrist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    5 months ago

    If I had a time machine, I’d go back and try to awaken Hitler’s creative side. I feel like getting him into writing, or maybe art, would be beneficial. It couldn’t possibly go wrong.

  • Got_Bent@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    I call LinkedIn occupational hubris

    I come from a big accounting firm, so most of what I see are former colleagues who’ve made partner posting about occupational efficiencies and how much financial gain they accomplish.

    Some of them are complete blithering idiots who’ve failed upwards and now think they’re geniuses

    Others are just complete psychopaths who would gladly shiv their own mothers in the neck for a fraction of a step up the ladder. Hell, they would boast about doing so.

    The latter facilitates and nurtures a toxic culture of stabbing your coworkers in the back at every possible opportunity for your own gain wherein saying anything good about a coworker, especially a subordinate, is a sign of weakness and considered sinful.

    But on LinkedIn, they’re all the heroes of their own narratives.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      You definitely had the ability to invest in the US/UK stock markets from Berlin during the 1920s. The Black Tuesday 1929 Wall Street crash kicked off a shockwave of economic contraction that toppled multiple European governments, Germany included.

      I have to assume that a hypothetical alt-history Hitler who was heavily invested in the DOW Jones in 1929 would have felt just about the same way.

  • solomon42069@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 months ago

    If you read it in Chris Parnell’s voice, it all makes perfect sense.

    LinkedIn is entirely populated by Leo Spaceman’s.

  • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 months ago

    I’m confident this guy is serious and insane, but if you read it as satire, it really hits home.

  • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    I’m pretty sure this is satire. It was posted earlier without the name obscured, and it’s a comedian.

  • pizza_the_hutt@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    The irony of this is that Hitler did have good business connections. Fascism cannot rise to power without strong support of big industry. Trump is trying to forge similar connections with the oil industry currently, offering to slash environmental regulations in exchange for a big campaign donation.

        • kameecoding@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Comparatively no, people drive about half the miles on year per average in europe and there are more households without cars.

          Also less consumption per capita

          And then for developing nations it’s not even close

        • Granixo@feddit.cl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          I live in a medium sized town in South America, and everywhere i go is by pedal. 🚴‍♂️

          I only use transport whenever i need to travel outside of town.

          And i’ll probably only own a car when i have a family 🚗

          • Emerald@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            Idk why but the emojis make this comment 1000 percent better. It reads like a picture book. The only way this comment could be better is if it said “Beep beep!” at the end.

      • pizza_the_hutt@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Both. Hitler did the same thing with the big businesses at the time. He promised them greater profits and reduced regulations in exchange for their support.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    If I were a good writer, I would write a science fiction story that was about a guy who goes back in time and convinces the art school that this Hitler kid isn’t very good yet, but he has a lot of promise, so accept him.

    • MindTraveller@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Eh, you’re only delaying the holocaust for about a year that way. Hitler was a talentless hack and he’d never make it in the art world in any timeline.

      • ThrowawayPermanente@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        You would need to teach him the way of the artist statement. His bullshit would be 100 years ahead of anyone else and he would effortlessly conquer the art world. Men would still be wearing those goofy little moustaches and people would rob banks wearing masks of his face.

    • BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      So I hang around social media with a lot of Nazis (I have a fake white Facebook alt to befriend them and get them banned), and many of them collect prints of Hitler’s art. It’s pretty awful.

  • masquenox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    Sooo… Hitler in that timeline would yet be another capitalist growing their wealth thanks to the mass-murder and exploitation people like Hitler in this timeline creates.

  • Dagnet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    Economically nazi Germany was doing really well, which had no small part in how they managed to raise such an army

    • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      A lie as great as saying Mussolini made the trains run on time. Not that you’re the only one to fall for it.

      https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy_of_Nazi_Germany

      https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mefo_bills

      TL;DR total wages rose because people worked longer hours. The economy was forced into, effectively, a war economy upheld with deficit spending (like America was doing with the New Deal, but with tanks instead of roads).

      The scam continued with the annexation of Austria, Czechoslovakia, and the stolen wealth and enslavement of the first Holocaust victims paying those debts.

      TL;Dr;tl;Dr

      They paid for their tanks with IOUs and then stole a bunch of gold with the tanks

      • Dagnet@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        My comment never at any point claimed it was sustainable or that their economic growth was ethical and somehow beneficial to the population. In the context of this post, that has someone talking about how Hitler would be nicer if he was financially successful I said that because to him he was successful, and to the countries economy he really was. Economic performance has nothing to do with a population’s quality of life, as it can be seen in China, but even so, when compared to Weimar republic it was still arguably better for everyone,which is the lowest bar ever.
        I’m not a nazi apologist, none of that makes what they did right or desireable, I’m just pointing it out that nothing would have changed if the likedin’‘s insane post actually came true. Heck, if he made more money he would just spend even more on the army just like your own link says, the economy’ s only purpuse to him was to build an army so they could steal more through conquest.