• sunglocto@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    24 days ago

    This insanely nonsensical behavior is prevalent in tons of communities, and it should be shunned and avoided. These moderators are not worth a fraction of your time.

      • mesa@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        24 days ago

        No joke, Periodic changing of mods might be a better long term strategy. Or like you said a small election from time to time.

          • gerryflap@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            24 days ago

            Don’t disagree fully, but time/energy is definitely a factor in this. I’m really not going to care enough to make an educated vote in all the communities that I’m in, I have better things to do. And likewise for a lot of people probably. Having 3 people vote in a mod doesn’t exactly give confidence either, it makes it easy to game the system. For smaller communities it’s probably better to retain the “benevolent dictator” system and punish any unruly mods with abandoning their community for a new one.

            • Goldholz @lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              24 days ago

              Yes yes. Another solution would be “no ban can be done by a single person/mod but the entire mod team, looking at the evidence aso”

              Or good old lottery instead of voting. Lottery getting random users to be mod for a curtain time

      • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        24 days ago

        Or even better - just let us moderate what we see ourselves. There’s no need for some wannabe dictators to get to decide what we can read or say. I don’t need or want an echo chamber of the mods preferred:allowed opinions and ideologies. As long as it doesn’t break the law just leave it and whoever said it alone, and let everyone else decide how they want to handle it.

    • Saledovil@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      24 days ago

      Yeah. The big advantage of the fediverse is that “if you don’t like it, leave” is practical advise instead of a way for the powerful to shut down arguments.

      • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        24 days ago

        In theory sure, but not in reality. Most communities are already consolidated on here, so shitty mods have control just like they do on reddit. “Just make a new sub if you don’t like the mods” didn’t work in Reddit and it doesn’t work on the fediverse for the exact same reasons.

        What we need is for mods to basically have no power over users or what they say. No bans, no deleting comments, no removing posts - just let people ignore/block who they want, and give them robust filtering options. It would be infinitely better for everyone who isn’t a big girls blouse who craves censorship of differing opinions.