Can you call them if your shop is broken into?

  • WiredBrain@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    1 month ago

    The protection is understood to basically be by them from them, in the event you don’t pay. If you pay, things are good. If you don’t, they’ll make sure things are not good.

    • TheFogan@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      1 month ago

      Though to my understanding, it is from them… to my knowledge if a shop gets broken into, in their territory you don’t call them, they already are aware and hunting down the perpetrators. Kind of what gang wars are… one gang basically declares an area their territory, if another gang takes action in that area they are basically declaring a gang war.

      Obviously gangs know it’s bad for business if they want to collect protection money, and they aren’t overwhelmingly the biggest thing to be afraid of.

  • Death_Equity@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    1 month ago

    There are two types of this, those that pay voluntarily and those who are extorted. If you pay protection money to a gang voluntarily, it is like insurance. If your business has a problem, the gang will deal with it. If you are the extorted type, then you may be on your own and you still owe money. They may act on your behalf because of the disrespect of hitting a business they deal with.

    Some businesses don’t so much pay protection money as they act as a money laundering node for the gangsters, so if your shop gets hit then their money gets hit and that is personal. These types are usually more affiliated or may be forced to launder.

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Yeah.

    If you pay protection, it’s because the payment is less than random thefts would be.

    The gang you pay, is supposed to be scary enough that random crime doesn’t happen in “their” areas.

    So you getting robbed, is an insult to their reputation. And to regain that rep, they find the idiots who robbed a store under their protection.

    Now, whether or not you see any of that money back isn’t really for sure. Because what matter is the reputation among the criminal underground.

    But the whole process is outdated, I’d be surprised if it’s still happening large scale. Most likely only for businesses who are already breaking the law, they couldn’t contact cops anyways.

    Like a methlab.

    You can’t call the cops even if you know who robbed the methlab. So if you don’t have muscle. You pay for protection

    • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 month ago

      Kind of, but really you’re just paying for protection from what they would do to you if you didn’t.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        An Ontario film distributor has alleged that the shootings are linked to an intimidation campaign by other film distributors to prevent popular South Indian movies from appearing in large chains.

        Guy who distributes Indian movies claims attacks on random movie theaters are to prevent his movies from being watched…

        I didn’t search very hard, but I can’t find a single other source for that being a thing.

        Even if it was, that’s basically the opposite of a protection racket. You get that right?

        • SGforce@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Brampton man charged with conspiracy, intimidation, extortion and uttering threats: York police

          The sub headline from that same article. The word “extortion”. You get that?

      • Arthur Besse@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        2nd arrest made in alleged shootings at GTA movie theatres

        article doesn’t say which of these theaters it was 🤔

  • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 month ago

    As second hand story from someone who lived in a Mafia controlled part of New York City, the neighborhood that he lived in was a poor working class neighborhood. Yet, each storefront had full glass pane windows while the other neighborhoods nearby had bars on their windows.

    The Mafia have an interest in protecting those “under their protection”. This would also spoil over into charity. The Mafia would generally be charitable to those within their neighborhoods to buy off complicity of the locals. For instance, you may not turn someone in if that person is running a soup kitchen in the community.

  • Acamon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 month ago

    Depending on the political climate, non state organisations can help resolve community issues and provide protection, while the official government views them as gangs / terrorists. For example, in Northern Ireland.

        • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          29 days ago

          If you can’t see the difference between taxes and extortion then you’re either extremely naive or really really dumb… In functioning democracies, taxes are used for the good of all.

          Extortion money goes to the mob boss.

          Then again, maybe you’re American? That would explain something too, as (again) you need an actual functioning democracy for taxes to work correctly

          • Flax@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            29 days ago

            Ah yes, I’m an American using the main UK based instance of Lemmy

            • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              28 days ago

              Sooooo, dumbass it is, then? You equate taxes with extortion. If you’re not a dumb American, there aren’t many other categories to place you.

  • IWW4@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    They protect you from them.

    AKA they don’t destroy your business or rape you or beat the shit out of you.

  • jet@hackertalks.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    If a bunch of business or people are paying protection and they are encumbered by crime/theft/loss of business - they have a problem. They will get together to solve the problem.

    This is dangerous for the protection group because now you have created a situation where your customers have a incentive to organize and fix their problems… And the protection gang is also a problem which could get solved

  • MintyFresh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Maybe if they don’t get a cut. But everything I know about organized crime comes from the sopranos.

  • dukeofdummies@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    29 days ago

    Ironically, kinda.

    Think about it. If somebody else threatens you for money, you won’t have any money to give them when they threaten you.

    It’s one of the reasons why you’ll often hear about “turf”. “Don’t start anything on my turf” It’s because everyone wants to be the only game on their turf so they don’t have to compete.

  • daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    In general they are the ones breaking your windows if you don’t pay. Paying for protection is more like paying for them not to fuck you up. If other person does something to you it’s not their problem.

    At least that’s how it works here.

  • deafboy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Yes. The most clever gangs even incorporate and offer legit security services for the government.

    Although, it took them a while to realize that this is the best exit strategy, so the '90s were a bit crazy in the eastern europe.

  • philpo@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    I know someone whose family founded a small retail chain (with like 5 shops or something, each operated by another relative) in an east European country shortly after the fall of the iron wall that is, well, pretty much associated with mafia-like structures.

    According to her after the initial mayhem they did have a group establish themselves that was more “mafia” like. Think black suits,old Mercedes Benz cars,etc. They actually had a “emergency number” they were supposed to call and where someone picked up 24/7. And according to her someone actually came - unlike the police back then (who also wanted money). They responded fairly fast - and to them it seemed like they actually at least tried to find perpetrators. But they were never quite sure if some of the people who robbed them were actually sent by these groups themselves to prove how much the shops needed protection. Over the times things got more extreme and the “group” only wanted money to protect people from themselves - possibly because drugs got involved and the “thugs” got younger. But at least then the police stepped up their game and did more.

    • NateNate60@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Did they (the gangs who asked for protection money) actually ever catch the people responsible or blamed to be responsible?

      • philpo@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        From what I understand,yes, but she said “they showed us a guy they beat to pulp, he said he is sorry. But the guy wore a ski mask when he robbed my aunt. How should we know if it was him or if that was just some homeless person?”