Zonefive@sh.itjust.works to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.worldEnglish · 12 days agoWhich of your favorite sci-fi tech seems achievable in a reasonable timeframe, say 100 years?message-squaremessage-square88fedilinkarrow-up144arrow-down11
arrow-up143arrow-down1message-squareWhich of your favorite sci-fi tech seems achievable in a reasonable timeframe, say 100 years?Zonefive@sh.itjust.works to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.worldEnglish · 12 days agomessage-square88fedilink
minus-squarenaught101@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·12 days ago(I know nothing about this) Could you to the sub-C measurement test enough times to show that it just empirically works, and then use it on that basis? Or are you saying that the sub-C measurement would prove that it doesn’t work (and it produces random noise)?
minus-squaredavidgro@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·12 days agoI’m not sure what you mean by ‘use it on that basis’. Yes, entanglement has been proven to work, but it can’t be used to communicate FTL.
(I know nothing about this)
Could you to the sub-C measurement test enough times to show that it just empirically works, and then use it on that basis? Or are you saying that the sub-C measurement would prove that it doesn’t work (and it produces random noise)?
I’m not sure what you mean by ‘use it on that basis’. Yes, entanglement has been proven to work, but it can’t be used to communicate FTL.