• RockBottom@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    29 days ago

    Energy scarcity and our atmosphere could be helped by charging by the kilo gram. There are people who take it as an incentive to get as close as possible to the limit, increasing the weight of the loaded aircraft!

  • InverseParallax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    30 days ago

    OSHA.

    The throwers have a union to stop them from killing themselves, which means we don’t give them 40kg things to break their backs regularly and anything over 22kgs they buddy lift or get a hoist or something.

    Thought it was just airlines being airlines too, but this makes complete sense, don’t be dicks about other people’s health.

    • Midnight Wolf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      30 days ago

      “One second, I just need to update some details before I can give you your boarding pass…”

      types into the terminal ‘customer wouldn’t let me weigh them, probably a fat fuck, recommend full body search at security checkpoint for contraband meals and soda’

      “Here you go, sorry about the delay, have a lovely day”

    • considine@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      30 days ago

      Mix everyone up in a big cauldron then shoot the mixture via cannon. Did I get it?

    • Midnight Wolf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      30 days ago

      Steal the plane for yourself, that way you get there faster and with no annoying people and babies.

      GTA has taught me well.

  • Death_Equity@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Airlines should charge a passenger based on weight. More weight means more fuel and more wear and tear, meaning higher costs.

    They would make more money in America and the UK, how they don’t capitalize on those untapped profits makes no sense.

      • ThePyroPython@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Yeah even Ryan Air tried proposing this and got roundly shunned.

        Mostly because they’d lose their core customer base of Gammon export to Majorca.

        And on behalf of the rest of the UK, my sincerest apologies to Spain. Please feel free to dispose of those cunts, nobody will miss them and you’d be doing us both a favour.

      • Midnight Wolf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        30 days ago

        “are you tired of battling for personal space? does your seatmate steal your in-flight lunch? does the thought of constant snacking make your skin crawl? fear no more, Nofatass Air is here! at NA, we too have endured the pain and suffering of traditional airfare. with our state-of-the-art ejection system, undesirable passengers can be dealt with at the touch of a button. and our patented seat-scale technology means that this can be automated; great for letting our flight attendants relax. the best part? there is no change in pricing - since we have already taken payment before boarding, we have already profited when we eject someone at 35,000 feet! visit nofatass.air and start enjoying travel again, today!”

      • Death_Equity@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        No it wouldn’t, if the industry as a whole started pricing based on weight, travellers aren’t going to start taking trains and ships.

        If a minority of airlines didn’t switch, they would get more passengers that would save money by going with them and would ultimately fail in the market.

        If a minority of airlines switched, they would decrease costs and very few people would decide against saving money on airfair on principle.

        The big airlines switching would have a new means to increase profits and decrease costs, which they love.

        Yes, the media will drag them through the mud and social media would have a tantrum, but the airlines would profit because nobody is going to decide 3 days on a train is better than 6 hours on a plane.

        • IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          30 days ago

          Any airline that tried this would immediately get sued in just about every country that has any sort of discrimination laws, and the airline would lose ten times out of ten.

          • Death_Equity@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            30 days ago

            Being overweight is not a protected class in the US, EU, or England. Some states and cities have laws that do prohibit weight based discrimination.

            There is no discrimination going on anyways when charging based on weight. You are contributing 300lbs of cargo and that cargo cost more than 200lbs of cargo to transport.

            • IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              30 days ago

              Being overweight isn’t the only source of weight variation. If a 6’4" man weighs the same as a healthy 5’0" woman, he’s probably dying.

              • Death_Equity@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                30 days ago

                That is true, but if her plus her luggage weights the same as him and his luggage, they should pay the same. If they don’t, their ticket price should reflect that.

                • IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  30 days ago

                  You don’t fly much, do you? Getting through check in is a pain in the ass enough as it is, and now you want to add a weigh in and price adjustment step for every person onto that?

              • yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                30 days ago

                You can legally discriminate against size though.

                If you’re in the top 1 percentile of sizes, any and all clothes will be much more expensive than if you were in the median.

  • abbiistabbii@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    29 days ago

    Time for me to say this again:

    THE WEIGHT LIMIT ON LUGGAGE IS TO PROTECT BAGGAGE HANDLERS FROM INJURY. IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH TAKE OFF OR LANDING WEIGHT.

    • Zenith@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      25 days ago

      They carry literal caskets with dead parts on commercial flights… that’s definitely heavier

      • abbiistabbii@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        25 days ago

        Right, so everyone should be allowed to bring on a coffin size suitcase with at least 100kg with of weight now? They plan that out in advance so unless you are going to inform the airline well in advance that you’re bringing a corpse’s weight of luggage on board, my point still stands.

        “They bring bodies on board so I can bring a 100kg suicase” is a level of logic only seen when a Karen screams at some poor customer service person because her plane was cancelled due to a hurricane as if there’s a secret network of hurricane proof planes that are only unlocked if you act like a bitch.

    • bobzilla@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      29 days ago

      If that’s all it is, then just slap a bright red tag on the over weight bags to warn the handlers. Right?

  • Sibshops@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    30 days ago

    I don’t know why this keeps getting posted everywhere. Workers have a lift limit the extra cost is for the extra person to handle the bag.

    • BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      30 days ago

      I’d also suspect humans on a plane will follow a normal distribution in terms of weight. The aircraft weight/loading is done on an average sized person (which used to be 75kg if I remember correctly). Conversely every motherfucker will load their luggage with as much shit as possible if it’s not limited.

          • RunawayFixer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            30 days ago

            In all airports that I’ve been through (all in Europe), the scanners for people + their carry-on luggage are from the customs agency, so from the government. They won’t check or enforce any airline weight limits there. The airline may still ask to check the weight of carry-on luggage at the gate, but I’ve never seen it as an automated process, only as spot checks.

          • electric_nan@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            30 days ago

            Hmm, perhaps. Good point, but I’ve flown enough that I should have seen someone flagged for overweight bags.

  • Chozo@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    30 days ago

    Y’all, the overhead bins and the seats have different weight ratings. If has nothing to do with the overall weight of the plane, they just don’t want the bins to come crashing down on your head mid-flight.

  • kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    30 days ago

    Well, no employee is going to be expected to physically lift me and every other passenger at any point, but they will have to lift all of our checked baggage, so it feels like my weight matters less than my luggage’s weight.

  • Please_Do_Not@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’ve always assumed you pay extra because multiple people have to carry the bag around after you check it, and that’s harder/more dangerous at higher weights.

    In warehouses, you gotta go get your lift belt and often a partner if something is over a certain weight, and you aren’t covered by workman’s comp if you just try to do it quickly without those, so it’s a serious hassle.