• rozodru@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Because it’s not about saving lives, it never has been. It’s about control.

  • EatATaco@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 month ago

    It only sounds like a contradiction if you take “pro-life” literally. In fact, I find this hard to understand at all if you simply just listen to pro-lifers.

    Let me be clear, I’m about as firm a supporter of a woman’s right to choose as they come. I’m also adamantly against the death penalty. Do you find this position to be contradictory?

    However, the general position of “pro lifers” does not contradict this at all, pretty obviously. They think that a fetus is a child that hasn’t been born yet, and because it hasn’t been born, it’s completely innocent. So you have no right to take it’s life. However, if some person in life has done something in life that removes that innocence, they believe sometimes that rises to such a heinous level that they must be permanently and irrevocably removed from society.

    There are other glaring contradictions in their position, like not wanting to provide support to that innocent baby once it has come into the world, but this is clearly not one of them.

    • Etterra@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I’m pro choice but also anti-death penalty, but only because if someone is horrible enough to deserve it then they don’t deserve death, because death is the easy way out of suffering. They deserve to live long, miserable lives in a 3-meter cell.

  • angrystego@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    I think they just see it as very simple: killing innocent babies - no, killing evil criminals - yes. It sounds perfectly alright if you don’t think about it too much.

  • Ixoid@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    It’s not about ethics, it never was. It’s about CONTROL.

  • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’m pro-choice, but mostly anti-death penalty, isn’t that a contradiction?

    I don’t really think so. A person’s bodily autonomy and the state’s power to execute citizens should not overlap.

    • Seasoned_Greetings@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      I think it’s not necessarily a contradiction to hold your pro-choice and anti-death penalty stance, but it’s still a contradiction to hold the pro-life and pro-death penalty stance if your reasoning behind the pro-life stance is that all life is sacred.

      I agree that a person’s body autonomy and the state’s power to execute citizens should not overlap, but I still think that giving the “all life is sacred” line to justify pro-life and then being pro-death penalty “because some people deserve to die” amounts to hypocrisy.

  • CM400@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 month ago

    Just guessing here, but I’d assume it’s because the unborn have potential and the bad guys had their chance. I don’t agree, but that’s what I assume being around some people like that…

  • Toneswirly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    welcome to high school debate class, where we think about issues with more nuance than most politicians.

  • ragepaw@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    Because it’s never been about anything other than control. The right to choose anything is abhorrent to them. The only rights they want you to have are the right to be dictated to and the right to be like them.

  • mechoman444@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Because it’s not about saving the lives of unborn babies and it never has been.

    It’s about curtailing choice.

  • Draconic NEO@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    They don’t actually care about life, they just don’t want women to have control over their bodies.

  • vzq@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    As someone recently told me, they don’t worry about saving lives, they worry about saving souls.

    You need to abide by the quaint rules of the magical sky daddy for that, even if they don’t make sense.

    • barsquid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      But the Skyfather himself has given us directions to induce a miscarriage with a tabernacle dust smoothie.

    • BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Except clearly any aborted fetus would immediately go to heaven based on what’s written in the bible. In fact, heaven should be absolutely completely full of dead babies based on miscarriages, stillbirths, etc. if you believe that they get a soul at the moment of conception.

      So that logic doesn’t really make sense either. Which is par for the course.

      • slickgoat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Actually, nobody goes to heaven when they die (according to the bible). Everyone must wait until judgement day when all the graves, etc, open and we all face judgement at that point. This surprised me when I first learned it because it goes against all the Christian culture I’ve ever been taught and experienced.

        So grandma isn’t currently in heaven no matter how good she was.

        • barsquid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          That’s a huge relief that perhaps my grandparents haven’t seen my embarrassing moments after all.

        • BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          That depends on which flavor of Christianity you’re looking at, but even the Catholics don’t think they go to Limbo, the pope had an entire study done on it, and the result was “we hope they go to heaven but we don’t know”

          A lot of the other denominations don’t subscribe to the original sin shtick, and therefore babies would go to heaven even without being baptized.

          • mrcleanup@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            I always loved the “do uncontacted remote tribes that haven’t heard of God or Jesus go to heaven?” question. So far everyone has answered yes. And then you realize that Christians could save everyone, everywhere, forever, just by destroying all their literature, not teaching religion, and letting it die with them. One sacrificial generation and everyone is saved forever.

            But they won’t do it because of greed and pride, the core aspects of their belief system.

    • cheese_greater@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      I dont think it really has anything to do with that. A state recently sued due to abortion and teen pregnancy reduction efforts leading to decreased teenage pregnancy rates arguing something along the lines of our populations are going down and it will cost us in population, political representation, and federal resources.

      This is about cheap/free labor, disenfranchising women, and maintaining a permanent disabled and poverty-stricken underclasses that keep everyone on up in line with the hierarchy

  • gordon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    The suffering is the point. It’s got nothing to do with morals or human rights or the death penalty or abortion or “Christian values”. It’s all about making “those people” suffer.