…to a reasonable degree, at least.

  • danhab99@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Cloths, headphones, handbags. Anything that’s just buying the brand.

    I don’t get why I should want these high end brands when the only thing I can afford from them is plastered with their logo.

    I’ve seen the Gucci tracksuit, the Jordans, the Beats, everything and I’m not impressed. Even though luxury things are luxury I don’t even agree with the luxuriousness of many of these products. For example, if I’m going to wear a Gucci tracksuit covered in the Gucci logo and using Gucci colors then it’s gotta look good first and foremost. If I’m going to hold a Hermes bag that’s not comfortable, or durable, or robust but is just supposed to look cool, then it’s gotta actually look cool! Not like something Shien could design.

    And yes I am aware of the concept of buying a store of value: diamonds, expensive watches, actually rare and valued handbags. But most of the famous luxuries I see in public are not that. They’re literally a poor man’s status symbol IMO.

    • uin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      For headphones, DEFINITELY not true in my experience. There’s cheap and gimmicky (like Skullcandy), there’s perceived “luxury” brands like Beats (which aren’t actually worth their money) but then there’s brands that actually offer significantly better quality and longevity for the price, like Sennheiser, Beyerdynamic, Audio-Technica and Sony to name a few.

      • danhab99@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        Sennheiser, Beyerdynamic, Audio-Technica and Sony aren’t famous luxury brands in the same way that Beats are.

        huh… in hindsight I didn’t think about my position about headphones all the way through, I was just mad about the existance of beats.

        sry