• jballs@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 months ago

      Q3 2026 will come around and the AI will report that revenues are down. The CEO will respond the only way they know, by ordering that costs be cut by laying off employees. The AI will report there is no one left to lay off but the CEO.

      Fade to black and credits roll.

    • MissJinx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      The thing is, for AI to work we still need hardware, houses, food etc. Yes a lot of jobs will change but other new type of jobs will come.

      Remember at the end of the day AI can’t do CPR

  • Damage@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    4 months ago

    Pathogens don’t really think of what will happen after the body they’re abusing dies

  • TheFeatureCreature@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    4 months ago

    Capitalism is all about short-term profit. These sorts of long-term questions and concerns are not things shareholders and investors think or care about.

    Further proof of this: Climate change.

    • BlackLaZoR@kbin.run
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      Funny thing is that capitalism accidentaly solves global warming same way as it created it - turns out renewables are cheaper than fossil fuel, and the greed machine ensures the transition to more cost efficient energy sources

      • Pelicanen@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        4 months ago

        The problem is that the previous accumulation of capital has centralized a lot of power in actors who have a financial incentive to stop renewables. If we could hit a big reset on everything then yes, I think renewables would win, but we’re dealing with a lot of very rich, very powerful people who really want us to keep being dependent on them.

        • abbadon420@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          They are only slowing us down though. They really cannot stop the change, because solar power is simply cheaper than oil. Once governments stop subsidizing oil, the big oil companies will be done for if they haven’t innovated by than. That is also one of the reasons why they are slowing us down, so they can buy more time to innovate and remain on top with a new, green business model.

          I hope all the big oil bosses get locked up for crimes against humanity, but I think they’ll just change their business model into something green and exploit us in some different way.

          This is why they say “they’re too big to fail”.

          • kingthrillgore@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            Everywhere except countries that have subsidized non-renewables which means they’ll become dumber and polluted and regress. And these countries (the US, specifically) have nuclear weapons and a lot of authoritative policy power.

      • abbadon420@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        This is not “capitalism accidentally solves climate change”. This is the effort of many people pushing for more development in green energy until it was able to be produced at a cost efficient way. From there, capitalism took over, as intended. For green energy to be be feasible, we needed it to get picked up by the capitalist machine, because the capitalist machine has all the power and infrastructure in place to make it into a succes.

        I predict that the same thing will happen with large capacity, small size home batteries once they become economically feasible. They are on the brink of becoming profitable and once they do, they will become a huge success and help reduce energy waste.

        Same thing goes for fusion, but we’re a long way off making that economically viable.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        turns out renewables are cheaper than fossil fuel, and the greed machine ensures the transition to more cost efficient energy sources

        Cool, when is that going to start happening? Because I only see a handful of electric cars and I see a whole ton of coal power plants.

    • Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      These sorts of long-term questions and concerns are not things shareholders and investors think or care about.

      Well that’s not true at all. The vast majority of investors are on it for the long term.

  • kingthrillgore@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    They won’t, they’ll simply die and the market will slowly adjust to those with capital.

    This is all happening because we shot a gorilla in 2016 btw.

    • Zron@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Don’t forget your sacred duty boys, dicks out for Harambe.

      It’s the only way to fix this fucked timeline

  • howrar@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    4 months ago

    Why would we need anyone to buy things? Remember that money is an abstraction for resources. If you can do everything with AI, then you already have all the resources you need. Whether or not someone else needs what you produce is irrelevant when you already have access to everything you could want.

    • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yeaaaah, the issue there is that, that is completely incompatible with our current system of capitalism. If we do not take deliberate steps to transform the system, it will collapse.

      • Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        It’s no less compatible with capitalism than any other economic system. The idea that humans are no longer needed to do any kind of work is an issue the world has never faced before.

        • sparkle@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          Cymraeg
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          I mean… it’s pretty compatible with leftist ideologies. Especially a moneyless form of socialism/communism

      • Deceptichum@quokk.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Good. The system is fucked.

        Let it collapse and we can work on a new system without hundreds of years of entrenched rich elites deciding it.

        • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          Instead of collapsing like a phoenix and birthing a new better world, it will cause death, suffering, and turn us into some sort of fucked up techno fuedalism worse than we are now.

          I understand the nihilism, but we need to take the broken pieces we have now and reshape them into something better, not throw them out hoping things become better for no reason. They won’t.

          • Deceptichum@quokk.au
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            There is literally death, suffering, and we’re heading towards some sort of fucked up techno feudalism today. Like we don’t need a revolution for that, that’s the path we’re currently heading towards without one.

            Revolution isn’t pretty but just as when we overthrew monarchs, the end result and saving of future lives justifies it.

  • bad_news@lemmy.billiam.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    Remember when crypto replaced all the banks? It will work like that – by it being a scam that never actually dominates anything, because it’s stupidly energy intensive and actually of very limited utility in practice.

  • minorkeys@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 months ago

    Whoever still has money. Either importing wealthy immigrants to replace the American market or they’ll move their products to the markets that still have money.

  • maynarkh@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 months ago

    The rich. Companies will stop targeting products to wider and wider swathes of people, just like nobody caters to the homeless now.

    • SkyNTP@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      This doesn’t sound sustainable at all. A billionaire only needs so much gasoline, food, medicine, TVs…

      Collapse of entire industries will happen way before we even get a chance to see industries reinvent themselves to cater to billionaires. Don’t believe me? Just look at what happened to the economy during the pandemic.

      • maynarkh@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        Yeah of course industries will collapse. 100 car factories will close, 5 superyacht factories will open, tying up the same amount of productivity. Owned by the same guy.

        There will be tons of spacecraft launchpads, private jet hangars, etc.

        And wars of course.

  • someguy3@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Capitalism doesn’t look that far ahead.

    I agree it’s going to be problem. It’s already happened when we exported manufacturing jobs to China. Most of what was left was retail which didn’t pay as much but we struggled along (in part because of cheap products from China). I think that’s why trinkets are cheap but the core of living (housing and now food) is relatively more expensive. So the older people see all the trinkets (things that used to be expensive but are now cheap) and don’t understand how life is more expensive.

  • sundray@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    As stated, the companies that push AI aren’t concerned with the long-term consequences. But if you want to know how the individuals who run those companies personally feel, do a search for billionaire doomsday preppers.

    TL;DR: They’ve got a vision for the future. We’re not in it.

    • deafboy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      All kinds of people fatasize about the end of times. From the losely asociated groups of rednecks, to the religious cults. The rich just has a better budget for their hobbies, and their toys are more visible. Which, paradoxicaly, disqualifies them from the prepping game.

      Number one rule about the secret bunker is not telling anyone about the secret bunker.

      • sundray@lemmus.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        rednecks, to the religious cults

        I see your point, but usually those groups don’t have the ability to accelerate the arrival of the end times, whereas the billionaires might.