While I know this survey is biased, it’s people who watch Brulosophy content and answer surveys, but my own experience backs this up: https://brulosophy.com/2024/05/27/2024-general-homebrewer-survey-results/

My personal experience mirrors that as well. Everyone in my homebrew group is that. Everyone in surrounding groups (as seen in pictures of state-wide gatherings) is that. 95% of the people I see in homebrew shops are that.

Why?

  • whoreticulture@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    When I was a kid, I was a girl and me and my best friend (also a girl) went to Dungeons and Dragons games hosted by a DM at a local gaming shop. We were in middle school, the other players and the DMs were all adults.

    There was a guy who would regularly teasingly poke my friend in a way that was clearly inappropriate and uncomfortable. Nobody stopped him. We did go for a few more sessions but eventually stopped attending. We stayed in the hobby, but it’s not a mystery why people would leave.

    Not to mention the underlying currents of racism in a lot of games.

    I know D&D and homebrew aren’t the same thing, but D&D is the intro for a lot of people so it’s very relevant.

    Edit: ahh okay different homebrew.

  • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    You’re conflating correlation with causation.

    Causation: Most homebrewing is a moderately expensive hobby, and so will skew toward middle class people

    Correlation: where you are located, middle class people are probably majority white. Also probably the majority of people in your area in general are white. Also the majority of people in general are straight.

    If you were in Japan or Colombia or Jamaica, middle class people would not be majority white.

    As for the male thing, brewing beer is viewed as a more masculine hobby. Call it a self fulfilling prophecy. Many women probably choose not to join the hobby because they view it as not something women should do.


    As an aside, it’s helpful to learn about Bayesian statistics in order to interpret trends and observations that you see in the world around you. Here’s an example:

    Paige is a young woman. Paige enjoys reading books and has a quiet demeanor. She also enjoys drinking coffee and watching romantic comedies.

    What is more likely?

    A) Paige is a teacher librarian

    B) Paige is a farmer

    Most people answer teacher librarian, but the answer is that Paige is overwhelmingly more likely to be a farmer. Simply because there are orders of magnitude more farmers than teachers librarians in the world.

    Edit: this would have made more sense if I said librarian instead of teacher. Let’s all just pretend I did 😅

    • TheRealKuni@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Most people answer teacher, but the answer is that Paige is overwhelmingly more likely to be a farmer. Simply because there are orders of magnitude more farmers than teachers in the world.

      But are there more farmers named Paige or teachers named Paige?

      I can’t imagine Paige is a common name in many of the countries which still rely on subsistence farming, where farming will be a far more prevalent occupation. In the US, where Paige is a relatively common name, there are around twice as many teachers as farmers according to my very brief (and probably not super accurate) research.

      Also I imagine that worldwide, farmers will skew male more than female. Just like how teachers probably skew more female than male. Note I didn’t bother to look for statistics for this, this is just a guess.

      If you were to not name a person or gender and just say “is this person more likely to be a teacher or farmer,” then sure, farmer. But we’ve limited our base group of people to women named Paige. Surely that adjusts the probability.

      • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Even if her gender and name adjusts the probability somewhat, it should all still be cancelled out by the order of magnitude by which the number of farmers outnumbers teachers, even in countries where a name like Paige is common. Teachers are an incredibly uncommon profession in the grand scheme of things, because it only takes a small proportion of them for a society to function (no offense intended to teachers of course)

        But I will admit, I believe the original version of this thought experiment didn’t give the woman a name. I was just trying to be a bit more descriptive haha. I’m pretty sure the thought experiment also predates the level of automation that is now common in agriculture. I was mostly just reconstructing it from memory.

        Edit: yeah I just looked it up and in the US there is roughly the same number of teachers and farmers (around 3.5-4 million). I guess this particular version of the thought experiment is dead. But you could construct a similar one with a more common profession. Or just pretend it’s still the 60s when you give your answer. Farming has simply become way too automated in the modern era.

        Edit 2: I’m just now realizing the original version of this that I heard was with librarians, not teachers! Librarians are actually still orders of magnitude less common than farmers so it would work in that case. This is what I get for relying on memory for my clever comments.

    • whoreticulture@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      Enjoying reading books, coffee, and romantic comedies are all factors that would influence statistics that you are just … ignoring?

  • vlad@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    I hope that one day we can judge people not by the color of their skin, but by the quality of their brew.

  • RBWells@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    I am a lady and I ferment plenty of stuff, both drinks and foods. But don’t like beer, so I don’t make it. The only guy I know who makes beer is a white guy, so my experience mirrors yours, but it’s also true that there are minority run commercial breweries and distilleries so I’m sure there is home brewing going on too.

  • PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    Mostly because it’s seen as hipster and mostly straight white dudes were the most enthusiastic adopters of the hipster aesthetic.

    Plus a lot of different cultures have different cultural traditions related to preferred drink and drinking practices, not all of which lend themselves easily, or even safely, to homebrewing.

  • SloppyPuppy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    As someone not American. Is it something that you do frequently wherever you go or do? Construing statistics about the people around you? And then being displeased about some fluke in the numbers? Like what does it matter?? I genuinely dont understand.

  • Postmortal_Pop@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Hey, I think I can be an outside voice here, while I am white, I’m poor, queer, and learned homebrewing from my Hispanic father in law making tepache.

    Given my experience with the Mexican brewing community and the rural white folk brewers in my area, I think the barrier here is just internet use. My father in law speaks limited English so he’s kind of adverse to forum conservation. The stillers back in my home town didn’t need the internet, they learned it from their parents and talked about it with their neighbors.

    For my part, I came here to bridge the gap and make something a little more white, middle-class, straight. My fil’s tepatche is a dinghy grey paint water, mine is a crisp, clear amber. I don’t see any dandelion or mulberry wine here, but champagne yeast makes for a better taste then bread yeast.

    If you’re looking for something different, pick a random fruit and see how we’ve used it for alcohol, because we’ve absolutely used it for alcohol.

    • whoreticulture@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I wonder if there isn’t a lack of people brewing outside the rich white man demographic… but more that they inhabit different social worlds so they aren’t seeing each other.

      • Postmortal_Pop@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        There’s exactly what in saying. The only middle class white folk I know are people on the internet, but I’m the only person taking about brewing on the internet that I know, so I’d bet there’s just a lot of offline brewers with their own wild ideas.

  • gedaliyah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    The middle class part makes sense. You have to be someone who both owns their own property and also has significant leisure time.

    • Drathro@dormi.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      As someone who makes meads/wines in a closet and has done so while renting, I don’t particularly see the relevance as long as your batches are small and contained… Typically, the tools and ingredients aren’t wildly expensive either if you’re keeping things simple (in the US, anyways). Honestly, I don’t see how more demographics don’t get into the basics of homebrewing. It’s dead simple to make something “passable” and with time and effort you can even make something good/great!

        • Drathro@dormi.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          A gallon glass carboy is $20-25 and that’s going to be your biggest up front expense. That’s reusable, however so once you’ve got that you’re not going to need another for simple small batches. Champagne yeast is like $10-20 for 10-20 packs (figure a dollar per pack) and each pack can easily make 2 gallons if you’re smart enough to split it in half. 3lbs of raw honey from Costco will run $12-15 and a gallon of boiled water rounds out your list. Yeast nutrient is probably a good idea since it almost guarantees good results (1lb is like $10-15 and you only use 1/4 tsp or so per gallon batch). One-way air locks for brewing with stoppers are $2-10 depending on how many you buy (also reusable). So your first batch is your most expensive at $85 absolute worst case with today’s prices. From there on out subsequent batches cost only the honey, water, and any fruit or spices you want to try adding. As far as hobbies go, that’s not bad considering how much variety there is in it. I can’t comment on beer, but mead is dead simple as long as you keep everything sanitized before and after brewing.

  • NeptuneOrbit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Back ten, twenty years ago you basically had to go to Europe to try good beer. Who was traveling to middle class white Americans.

    Starting a brewery before recently was often a mark that someone had time and info to practice brewing at home, interest in European food and history, plus the start up capital/safety net to start the business.

    Now a bunch of relatively privileged people who think it’s possible for them too…

  • hperrin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Probably because middle class straight white men are often very exclusionary.