• gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    problem where a ton of attention and discussion is required to determine what’s covered and what isn’t

    Criticizing aspects of the current insurance-based system but claiming they’re about Universal? Classic libertarian move.

    Universal Healthcare doesnt have that problem, it’s what universal means.

    • howrar@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      Universal Healthcare doesnt have that problem, it’s what universal means.

      This idealized version of universal healthcare isn’t possible because it’ll require more resources than we have as a species. There’s always more that you can do to improve health outcomes. A line had to be drawn somewhere.

      • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        This idealized version of universal healthcare isn’t possible because it’ll require more resources than we have as a species

        No, it won’t.

        There’s always more that you can do to improve health outcomes

        That’s not what Universal Healthcare is.

        • howrar@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          You’ll have to explain what you mean by universal healthcare then. Wikipedia says

          Universal healthcare does not imply coverage for all cases and for all people