It was no April Fool’s joke.

Harry Potter author-turned culture warrior J.K. Rowling kicked off the month with an 11-tweet social media thread in which she argued 10 transgender women were men — and dared Scottish police to arrest her.

Rowling’s intervention came as a controversial new Scottish government law, aimed at protecting minority groups from hate crimes, took effect. And it landed amid a fierce debate over both the legal status of transgender people in Scotland and over what actually constitutes a hate crime.

Already the law has generated far more international buzz than is normal for legislation passed by a small nation’s devolved parliament.

  • minkymunkey_7_7@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    23
    ·
    9 months ago

    My guess is $$$billionaire$$$ money is involved somewhere in this woven tale of bigotry. Nobody is doing this level of terf shit for free.

          • FarmTaco@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            Fuck you money just means she can be honest with her true opinion. Making dumbledore gay is easy, because it doesnt infringe on “her rights” as she sees it.

          • ripcord@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            it’s amazing how few people care about evidence and facts, it’s all conspiracy theories and feels.

            I mean, this is how Trump is a politician, but it’s so damn pervasive in general.

          • minkymunkey_7_7@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            17
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            Billionaires don’t do anything for free. Her hate speech is an investment in the platform to make more money. Her public opinions make her more money. Nobody is paying her to say it. But consider her stance an investment into more money.

            I don’t know where people are getting the idea that I said anything about someone paying her to say this stuff.

    • root_beer@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      Nah, she’s entirely capable of being cold wet garbage on her own, and for free! She was just smart enough to come out with her shit takes after making tons of bank on her average storytelling. The again, Harry Potter is still stupid popular even after she piped up, so maybe it wouldn’t have matter if she’d shown her whole ass right after the fifth book, people don’t care.

    • Cagi@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      She is a billionaire in her own right, she doesn’t need to be paid off, she’s rich enough to do what she wants without consequences. Like blatantly break hate crime laws solely to flaunt her legal immunity.

      The only billions that corrupted her were her own, but all they did was expose who she is deep down.

      • Cagi@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        She can also do what she wants without social consequences. Trans allies don’t mind gifting her another few million here and there in royalties for spin off products like Hogwarts Legacy. She has outright said she feels justified on being a bigot because people keep making her richer, “allies” included. Allies are only allies when they don’t have to contend with even the most minor temptation.