So far my list includes Comcast, EA, and Nestle. Tell me yours, and I’ll help out.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 years ago

      They do…

      The only advantage SpaceX has is that if NASA blew up a launchpad, there would be an investigation.

      Everyone is used to Musk fucking shit up, and his defenders pretend it’s really a success.

      Your problem is with the politicians who control NASA funding, not NASA.

        • intensely_human@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Hey it’s got the best lawyers alright? It’s an amazing legal team, one of the most powerful in the space industry.

        • pensa@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 years ago

          I disagree. I think NASA still innovates but they do it on things like propulsion and earth sciences.

      • intensely_human@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        They literally don’t innovate in the same way. Like you said, if NASA blew up anything there’d be an investigation, making it impossible for them to iterate rapidly, meaning they are unable to innovate in the way private companies can.

    • pensa@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      They can’t because when they fail the public and then congress wants to cut their budget. NASA can no longer innovate and maintain funding.

      I hate that I have to put this qualifier but this is NOT an endorsement of musk.