Looking at the two big news publishers in my country. One isn’t reporting about the current bombings at all, while the other one is phrasing their words mostly anti-Palestinian.

Is there some neutral coverage I can keep up to? Where do you guys get your info from?

  • theDOSgod@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    There is no such thing as unbiased reporting of ANY events. Real time or historical. All reporting is biased.

    • JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      While technically true, this attitude is desperately self-defeating. It is possible to look for the truth, and to get more or less close to it. This principle is the founding ethic of journalism, for instance. A world in which nobody believes in truth is a world of mass manipulation, of nihilism, most likely of totalitarianism.

      • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        A world in which nobody believes in truth is a world of mass manipulation

        “Communication” is a form of manipulation. Your comment - and mine - are attempts at conveying thoughts to foreign minds. The best word for “mass manipulation” is “society”.

        It is possible to look for the truth,

        I reject the idea that such a truth objectively exists anywhere but within the realm of mathematics. Everywhere else, it is subject to the philosophical ideologies of the seeker: it is fundamentally and intrinsically biased.

        This principle is the founding ethic of journalism,

        Journalism is a systematic communication of thoughts, and as such, it is itself a form of mass manipulation, no matter how benign the intentions of the journalist.