I mean the physical design of the gun, not the projectile or effect.

  • teft@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Zat’nik’tel from Stargate SG:1.

    First shot stuns. Second shot kills. Third shot disintegrates.

      • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        11 months ago

        I love Daniel Jackson but Michael Shanks is such a d-bag in basically every interview (and there are some very questionable “behind the scenes” stories about him…). In that clip he somehow manages to be the most obnoxious Comic Book Guy fan ever… while being on the stage.

        The 1-2-3 is REAL stupid, no arguments there. Well, specifically, the “3 shots disintegrates” is. The 1-2 is not. Killing someone with a “less than lethal” weapon is just reality. And you can potentially get some real awesome moments when Teal’c or Ronon show how much of a beast they are by tanking multiple zat shots before succumbing.

        But also… the 3 is incredibly useful from a narrative perspective and is the same reason that Starfleet uses phasers. Having one prop that can fulfill multiple roles and act as a “get out of plot hole free” card (as mentioned with hiding the bodies) is incredibly useful narratively.

        All that said: I do love that the Tau’ri were very clearly about “more dakka”. Insert meme about Starfleet being afraid to intervene with other cultures and Stargate wanting to get their Nic Cage on.

    • stoy@lemmy.zipOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I am going to have to agree with Michael Shanks from the orher comment here, it looks like a penis.

      I mean, it raising itself up before it can fire is a cool effect, but the design it self it not a favourite, and I love SG1