Do you mean Kevin Stroud’s linguistic history one? If so, I do listen to it and like it a lot. I didn’t include it because his degrees are in poli-sci and law, but he at least follows my main shibboleth for a thoughtful podcast by not shying away from “it depends” as an answer.
What I don’t like as much are the “well I need to make sure I tell a good story” types who read one secondary source, misinterpret one primary source, and then spend the rest of their time making sure they are awesome and dramatic. I don’t have time or motivation to keep up with the literature on Egyptology, but I’d prefer to get my survey of the subject from someone who does.
Do you mean Kevin Stroud’s linguistic history one? If so, I do listen to it and like it a lot. I didn’t include it because his degrees are in poli-sci and law, but he at least follows my main shibboleth for a thoughtful podcast by not shying away from “it depends” as an answer.
What I don’t like as much are the “well I need to make sure I tell a good story” types who read one secondary source, misinterpret one primary source, and then spend the rest of their time making sure they are awesome and dramatic. I don’t have time or motivation to keep up with the literature on Egyptology, but I’d prefer to get my survey of the subject from someone who does.