Kind of a trend, the amount of youtubers who i had loved but their content became generic after gaining popularity is quite a bit, most drastic one being mrwhosetheboss, his uniqueness went down faster than MH27 MH17

  • Raxiel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    I stopped watching after the “speed of electricity in a wire” video. When I realised a video about something I knew about was bollocks, it made me question every other video that taught me about something I didn’t know.
    Even if that had been a one off, how would I know? The trust is gone.

      • Raxiel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        11 months ago

        Without getting into it too deeply the way he conflates induction and conductivity just to set up some kind of gotcha.

        • Annoyed_🦀 @monyet.cc
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Op said it’s bollock, not because it’s confusing, so i’m curious what went wrong as well. I think Electroboom challenge him as well, but not sure the context and how it went.

    • Tedhan@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      There are a lot of videos that made me question the validity of his “science”. While I didn’t want to spend time dissecting a specific video but with the videos piling up I decided it would be easier to just not watch him. I don’t watch videos to question whether it’s bullshit or not, so I ended up watching videos where I don’t have to ask that question.

    • refoux@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 months ago

      I’ll purposely seek out videos covering topics I’m (more) familiar with, from unfamiliar content creators that I might be interested in watching more of. It helps me gauge their accuracy, confidence, and ability to simplify without losing the underlying reasoning.