Which generally comes with “I am more important than those forigners and hence should be treated better than them” which is just another form of “what’s in it for me”.

Certainly my experience from living in Brexit Britain is that the kind of people who couldn’t accept criticism of Britain were also the kind who though they were superior to foreigners because of being Britons and expected to be better treated than foreigners for it, and that wasn’t just in their own country but also for example when on vacations abroad.

I’m Portuguese and I get the impression that the way the Portuguese were different from most European colonialist powers is that the Portuguese would fuck (in a literal sense) just about anybody, which is a huge contrast with for example the English that tended to not mix with the natives.

Brasil, the only place outside Africa which was a Portuguese “colony”, is a wonderful example of racial mixing (though it has its issues).

Not saying that Portuguese colonialism was good (it was not even close to positive), just that it serms to have had this unusual higher tendency for people to mix across races, not because it was done with good intentions but it just happened to there being something in Portuguese culture (damned if I know what) that led to that.

Patriotism: “What can I to for my country?”

Nationalism: “What can my country do for me?”

In my experience living in a couple of countries in Europe, generally the bigger the country the more the nationalism (though Germany is maybe exceptional on this) - small countries have very little tendency for people and business to display the flag and have flag-themed products and objects whilst larger countries have more of that.

That said, the far-right everywhere are flag-shaggers and during periods with large international sports events (for example, the World Cup) many normal people will display a national flag, though even then it’s more so I large countries than small ones plus in some countries other flags are used (for example, in Britain they use the flags of the nations rather than the UK flag and in The Netherlands they use the “Oranje” flag rather than the Dutch flag).

I think the only country in Europe with nationalism close to America is the UK and I don’t believe it’s anywhere the same level (for example, they have nothing like the Pledge Of Alliegance).

If you’re doing it daily, it’s not really special IMHO.

That’s not as much a difference as one might think because the flour too is mainly “sugar”, specifically it’s starch which gets turned into glucose same as the sweet tasting sugars (side note: it’s quite an interesting process since saliva itself containes enzymes that break the starch into glucose and you can actually test this yourself using iodine solutions - which you should be able to get from a pharmacy - which turns starch purple).

Ultimatelly when it comes to nutrition, you should care mainly about carbohydrates in general (which includes all the stuff that is not sweet tasting but gets turned into glucose by the human body) rather than sugars specifically.

Once you look at it this way you’ll find out that a ton of stuff which is not sweet is none the less rich in “sugars”, namelly things like bread, pasta, polished rice and so on.

Well, any number other than zero is infinitelly greater than zero.

I vaguelly remember reading that Germany made Copyright Violation even for personal use a Crime, rather than merelly a Civil Law affair like it is in most countries.

Mind you, I might be wrong on the countries or on the details (i.e. maybe it’s only a Crime if it’s for profit).

Edit: So I searched for it and from here I got that:

Are there criminal copyright provisions? What are they?

Copyright infringements under German law also constitute criminal acts, which are punishable by fines or up to three years’ imprisonment. If the infringement is done on a commercial basis, the maximum punishment is five years in prison.

According to German copyright law, unlawful exploitation of copyrighted works, unlawful affixing of the designation of an author and the infringement of related rights are subject to imprisonment of not more than three years or a fine. In addition, any attempt shall be punishable.

The unlawful exploitation of copyrighted works on a commercial scale is subject to imprisonment of not more than five years or a fine.

The infringement of technological measures and rights management information is subject to imprisonment of not more than one year or a fine.

As I said, in most countries copyright infringement is not a Crime, just a Civil Law matter (i.e. you can be sued by the owners of the Copyright for damage but you won’t be sued by the State to pay a fine or even be jailed for it). Frankly judging by what it says there German law is very draconian on this.

Wait, wait, wait: what the fuck is that format of news program.

Are “man doing bad jokes and woman doing fake performative laughs” standard in news programs over there or are these people just especially incompetent?!

That stuff was seriously cringe.

Look, I’m extrapolating from the general rule to the specific case of torrenting.

The general rule is that, because the IP protocol requires numerical addresses to connect to a remote machine, if what you have is a site name you have to translate that name into a numerical address before you can actually establish a connection, and a DNS query is how you translate site names into their numerical IP addresses.

Now, if you look at the contents of a tracker, what you see are not numerical addresses but site names, so those must be translated into numerical addresses before your client can connect to those trackers, hence DNS queries are done to do that translation.

Meanwhile, if you look at the “peers” section in an active torrent in your torrenting program, you see that they all have numerical IP addresses, not site names. This makes sense for two reasons:

• Most of those machines are user machines, and usually users don’t just buy a domain to have site names for the machines they used only as clients (i.e. browsing, torrenting and so on) since that is not at all needed. Site names are required for machines which serve stuff (literally, “server machines”, such as machines hosting websites) to arbitrary clients that by their own initiative connect to that machine - they’re meant as a human readable memorable alias for the numerical IP address of a machine, which people can enter in appropriate fields of client applications to connect to that site (i.e. putting “lemmy.dbzer0.com” in your browser rather than having to remember that its IP address is “51.77.203.116”)
• As I said, IP connections require IP numerical addresses to be established. For performance reasons it makes sense that in the torrent protocol the information exchanged about peers and between peers is always and only the machine’s numerical IP address since with those there is no need to do the additional step which is the DNS query before they can be used by the networking layer to open TCP/IP or UDP/IP connections to those peers.

Hence my conclusion is that the torrenting protocol itself will only deal with site names (which require DNS queries before network connections can be made to them) for the entrance into the protocol (i.e. start up and connect to trackers) and then deal with everything else using numerical IP addresses only, both because almost no peer will actually have a site name and because it’s low performance and doesn’t make sense to get site names from peers and have to resolve those into numerical addresses when then peer itself already knows its numerical address and can directly provide it. Certainly that’s how I would design it.

Now, since I didn’t actually read the protocol or logged the network connections in a machine torrenting to see what’s going one, I’m not absolutely certain there are now DNS queries at all after the initial resolution of the trackers of a torrent. I am however confident that it is so because that makes sense from a programming point of view.

Well, if the trackers are specified as names (and a quick peek at some random torrent shows that most if not all all), those do have to be resolved to IP adresses and if that DNS query is happening outside the VPN then your ISP as well as the DNS server being queried can see you’re interest in those names (and it wouldn’t be hard to determine with a high probability that you are indeed torrenting something, though WHAT you are torrenting can’t really be determined by you merely accessing certain servers which have torrent trackers active, unless a specific server only tracks a single torrent, which would be pretty weird).

Things like peers aren’t DNS resolved since they already come as IP adresses.

So when it comes to torrenting as far as I know all that the DNS can leak is the information that you ARE torrenting but not specifically WHAT you are torrenting.

It’s more in things were you’re constantly doing DNS queries, such as browsing, that DNS leaking can endanger you privacy: if for example somebody is going to “hotsheepbestialityporn.com”, somebody at their ISP could determine that person’s very specific sexual tastes from seeing the DNS queries for hotsheepbestialityporn.com coming in the open from their connection.

It might be a DNS problem.

I vaguely remember that Mullvad has a setting to make sure that DNS queries go via the VPN but maybe that’s not enabled in your environment?!

Another possibility is that Mullvad going down and then back up along with your physical connection when your ISP forces a renewal of the DHCP is somehow crapping up the DNS client on your side.

If you have the numerical IP address of a site, you can try and access the site by name in your browser when you have problems in the morning and then try it by nunerical IP address - if it doesn’t work by name but it does by numerical IP it’s probably a DNS issue.

PS: you can just run the “ping” command from the command line to see if your machinr can reach a remote machine (i.e. “ping lemmy.dbzer0.com”) and don’t need to use a browser (in fact for checking if you can reach machines without a webserver, the browser won’t work but the ping command will).

Even if Mullvad did erroneously allow applications to access your physical network connection for a moment, because you bound qbittorrent explicitly to the network device of the Mullvad VPN, qbittorrent will never use the physical connection.

You can check this out easily by disconnecting Mullvad and trying to torrent something on qbittorrent and also browsing the Net: you’ll notice the browser gets through just fine but qbittorrent will not.

Mullvad leaking would be a problem if what you’re worried about is loss of privacy or government surveillance, not for torrenting if your torrent server is correctly bound to the VPN device.

Yeah, you’re right,

From what I’ve heard the extreme racism is generalized in the Mainstream Press in Israel, so I’m not sure that it’s the Social Media that’s making Genocide along ethnic lines be more broadly accepted there than it was in Nazi Germany.

That said, the fables in Israel around “The Jewish People” and its identity with the Palestinians as “antagonists”, have been spun for far longer and the antagonism has been going on for far longer (since the creation of the state of Israel) than the ones in Nazi Germany with Jews as “antagonist”, so maybe the much longer time (about 70 years) during which Israelis have been indoctrinated about their own ethnic superiority and the “antagonism” of Palestinians in Israel compared to the length of the similar indoctrination of the population in Nazi Germany, is the main cause for the more broad acceptance of Genocide amongst the populus in Israel than in Nazi Germany.

If you’ve grown up hearing about how you’re part of a superior people (“God’s chosen people”) and Palestinians are The Enemy who hate you and want you dead, and your parents too grew up like that, you’re probably far, far, more likely to be an extreme racist that trully believes themselves to be inherently superior and that Palestinians as not really human like themselves - hence having zero empathy for the suffering of Palestinians and maybe even relishing in it - than somebody who has only been exposed to similar shit for a decade or two.

There is no such thing as a “Jew memory” shared by all Jews.

The individuals doing this shit certainly heard the stories as that stuff is constantly repeated and part of the national identity in Israel, but they didn’t feel the suffering and in fact most of them don’t even come from families which suffered in the Holocaust as most Israelis are not from families that came from Western Europe.

Even when people felt the horror by being on the other side, they need to actually be able to empathise with their victims to not want to inflict that same horror on them: in other words they need to not be sociopaths or psychopaths and to see those victims as fellow human beings. Notice how in Israel, just like in Nazi Germany, the targetted ethnicity are constantly dehumanized with extreme racist statements about them, to the point that Palestinians in Israel are called “human animals” similarly to how Jews in Nazi Germany were “untermenschen” (sub-humans).

With a population of people were 99.999% did not in fact suffer anything in the Holocaust (there is literally only a handful of people in Israel who were alive back then, living in Western Europe and who were caught by it), with an actual constitution stating the superiority of their race (literally “the chosen people”) and enshrining discriminatory treatment on race (the Israeli constitution says that only Jews can be Israeli Nationals), under constant extreme racist propaganda in most of the Press and in statements from politicians very literally dehumanizing the ethnicity they’re targetting (“human animals”) and with sociopaths and psychopaths not just part of the highest levels of government and the military but in general being given free reign to execute their most violent fantasies with no pushback as long as it’s against the “lesser” races, this kind of shit is not just unsurprising, it’s innevitable.

“Won’t somebody think of the poor genocidal murderers!?”

Edit: didn’t read it beyond the first few words and had a kneejerk reaction. My bad.

Ethnic Genocide is now fully Normalized in Israel.

In some ways this is actually beyond Nazi Germany, were the actual perpetrators of the genocide did not make a public show of their murdering of the people they saw as untermenschen.

This kind of thing is a pretty good indication that there is far broader acceptance (glee, even) amongst the Israeli population for Genocide than there was amongst the German population in Nazi Germany.

It happened to me for during a couple of days last week that I could hear my own heartbeat whenever it was quiet.

No idea why and it’s gone now.

I think that in the database space MS-SQL was never the best option at any level or at least not for long.

Oracle could be said to still be the best amongst databases for high performance and very large datasets, but in my experience in the smaller and mid-sized databases space things like Postegres and even No-SQL databases surprassed MS-SQL already back in the late 90s, early 00s.