Please, tell me how “paying for hardware costs is enough”…

  • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I assume he’s applying donations to the server costs first, then considers extra as profit/salary. We should be considering developer time as a core part of server costs, but I think people would react poorly if server donations went to personal expenses before server expenses.

    I think one of the best thing hosts could do is be transparent about costs and how much time maintenance takes and what sort of effective wage they are getting.

    • rglullis@communick.newsOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      Or we could drop the whole idea of depending on “donations” and understand that admins like professionals who would like to make a living like everyone else?

      • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’m fine having the burden spread unevenly. I don’t mind donating more so that a free platform is available to anyone who wants to use it. Whether something is funded by donations or fees is separate from whether the cost of people’s time should be included in the revenue target.

    • shnizmuffin@lemmy.inbutts.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I think people would react poorly if server donations went to personal expenses before server expenses.

      The distinction is an illusion. If a person can’t afford to live, and a part of their life is running a server, who gives a fuck which dollar goes where?

      (Other than all the dipshits who offer 0 and demand anything more than nothing.)