In the piece — titled “Can You Fool a Self Driving Car?” — Rober found that a Tesla car on Autopilot was fooled by a Wile E. Coyote-style wall painted to look like the road ahead of it, with the electric vehicle plowing right through it instead of stopping.

The footage was damning enough, with slow-motion clips showing the car not only crashing through the styrofoam wall but also a mannequin of a child. The Tesla was also fooled by simulated rain and fog.

  • rumba@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 days ago

    But they do, there are literally cars out there with lidar sensors.

    The question was why can’t I have a lidar sensor on my car if my $150 vacuum has one. The lidar sensor for a car is more than $150.

    You don’t have one because there are expensive at that size and update frequency. Sensors that are capable of outdoor mapping at high speed cost the price of a small car.

    The manufacturers suspect and probably rightfully so that people don’t want to pay an extra 10 - 30 grand for an array of sensors.

    The technology readily exists rober had one in his video that he used to scan a roller coaster. It’s not some conspiracy that you don’t have it on cars and it’s not like it’s not capable of being done because waymo does it all the time.

    There’s a reason why waymo doesn’t use smaller sensors they use the minimum of what works well. Which is expensive, which people looking at a mid-range car don’t want to take on the extra cost, hence it’s not available

    • Lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      13 days ago

      Only Tesla does not use radar with their control systems. Every single other manufacturer uses radar control mixed with the camera system. The Tesla system is garbage.

      • rumba@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 days ago

        yeah, you’d think they’d at least use radar. That’s cheap AF. It’s like someone there said I have this hill to die on, I bet we can do it all with cameras.

          • rumba@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            13 days ago

            Not sure it’s a him thing, though it definitely could be. An inexpensive Chinese radar element could have eliminated all these problems and they could still use cameras as the main system. It would have cost them dollars to add it to the parts list and it’s just a minor input to the collision avoidance stuff.

            I would expect him to do a cost-savings thing and pull parts, but they’re not really all that cost adverse. ( until you get to QC )

            Maybe it was a DOGE kid he hired to come up with ideas or something. Doing with cameras only is more like a technical challenge, nobody looks at that and goes, WOW they can just do that with cameras, they go wow, that’s a horrible idea full of dust, dirt and mud issues.

            That said, he has made worse plans :)

            • _g_be@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              13 days ago

              Your perspective is very generous to Elon. “It’s a cheap part, why would they omit it? Probably it was some dumb kid working there”.

              Usually cost-cutting measures that make significant compromises are top-down pushes, profit is their concern. Might not have been the CEO himself but, in my perspective, it would have been from the top levels.

              • rumba@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                13 days ago

                No I’m not trying to be generous, If it were just a dumb decision it would totally have been his. This is like a recent graduate engineer vendetta kind of decision. I don’t think he’s actually smart enough to try to make this bad decision.

                • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  13 days ago

                  Back in like 2016, a huge part of the grift was that Tesla was a tech company and their system would get smarter forever as it got more data.

                  Using an expensive sensor that can just detect objects instead of relying on computer vision and machine learning is kinda like an admission of failure.

      • rumba@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 days ago

        Shit that’s pretty decent. That looks like a ready fit car part, I wonder what vehicle it’s for. Kind of sucks that it only faces One direction but at that price four them would not be a big deal

        • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          13 days ago

          I can’t find what it goes to, but it looks like Baidu and the US company Zoox use them in their robotaxis.

          Edit: Lixiang models L9, L8, and L7 use that sensor.