After a hardware upgrade I ended up with a spare mini pc. Noticed these two icons and thought I might be able to use it as a WiFi access point with VLANs using OPNsense.

Is that possible? If so, what do I even need to buy to plug into there?

I don’t need it to do any fancy dhcp, dns or firewall stuff, I just need a WiFi access point with support for VLANs.

  • stoy@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    5 months ago

    Before you start with this project, consider the power use of a full X86 system even at idle and compare that to a standard router.

    If you are looking to run this as an access point permanently, the cost of power may add up.

    I am not saying that you shouldn’t do it, but take it into account before deciding.

    • kitnaht@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 months ago

      The architecture doesn’t determine the power draw so much as the system design. I’ve got a Chromebox running an i3 and sipping 4.5w at idle.

    • elyviere@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      That’s a good point, I’ll see if I can figure out the power draw of this system somehow. Any tips?

  • Shimitar@downonthestreet.eu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    opnSense and WiFi don’t play too well due to limited BSD WiFi support.

    OpenWRT is a much better choice for an AP.

    At least make sure the WiFi on the minipc is supported by opnSense before attempting that…

    • elyviere@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      I don’t mind which software, I could absolutely use openwrt instead. Assuming I do, which hardware might I need?

      • Shimitar@downonthestreet.eu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        I only used OpenWRT on netgear (arm) hardware… So for x86 I have no idea, but they have great forums you can lurk or inquire…

        It should support all WiFi chipsets supported by Linux.

  • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    You’d probably be a lot better off buying a decent access point (unifi, mikrotik, Aruba instanton).

  • poVoq@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    These are probably just rubber nubs where you could install wifi antennas. You would still need to buy the antennas and a pcie m2 wifi addon card.

  • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    It is possible but not recommended. The hardware is designed to world as a client so it is likely missing a lot of modern features. You can but the quality of the signal will suck. It might be fine as a temporary solution for a single device but that’s it.

  • pHr34kY@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I’ve done this before on Ubuntu. You can install nftables for routing, then install hostapd for a wifi AP.

    • elyviere@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Sounds like a pain to configure compared to some of the more designated systems. Is the advantage that you use Ubuntu for other things as well, so it’s a more multifunctional system?

      • pHr34kY@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        That’s basically it. My Ubuntu server is a router, NAS, plex server, public statum-1 NTP server, wordpress server, nextcloud server, security camera NVR, SMTP/IMAP mail server, CUPS print server, tor relay, and probably a few other things I forgot about.

        You can do a lot with a single CPU from 2015.

        I don’t have hostapd on it anymore. I now have dedicated APs on OpenWRT. The main problem with using a WNIC for an AP is that they don’t typically have a very strong broadcast output. I had to add an amplifier, and even then it wasn’t great.