I fired my entire dev team. Replaced them with O1, Lovable, and Cursor. Now I ship 100X faster with code that’s 10X cleaner. Open AI o3 is coming, and 90% of dev jobs won’t survive.

  • Technus@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    122
    ·
    12 days ago

    Managers who try to replace engineers with AI are probably shitty bosses to work for anyway, because they don’t have a single fucking clue about what the job actually entails.

    The only thing those employees lost was their income. I’d move on and never look back.

    • sik0fewl@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      50
      ·
      12 days ago

      Managers who try to replace engineers with AI are probably shitty bosses to work for anyway, because they don’t have a single fucking clue about what the job actually entails.

      Replace “AI” with anything or anyone promising quick, easy or cheap solutions.

      • Technus@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        35
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        12 days ago

        This decade it’s AI, last decade it was outsourcing to the third world. The assault on skilled workers never stops.

          • Zos_Kia@lemmynsfw.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            11 days ago

            Yeah I remember when I started my career 15 years ago they were already trying to re-internalize projects after having horrible off -shore experience…

            • inv3r5ion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 days ago

              Arguably it’s been going on since Nixon normalized relations with China, which led to the factories moving there for cheaper labor and the eventual hollowing out of the so called middle class in America.

              It really took off in the 90s though with the passage of NAFTA and the establishment of the idea of globalization and neoliberalism aka “third way” thinking and the idea of the “end of history” (Francis Fukuyama) after the fall of the USSR. (He has since reneged on a lot of ideas that made him popular in the first place).

              It most certainly has not been just a decade though. Any fair argument is gonna pin it on being the last 30-50 or so years.

    • Valmond@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      11 days ago

      Few managers have a clue about what is needed or how, the good ones knows that, the bad thinks things like “it can’t be that hard!”.

      • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        11 days ago

        I had a manager tell my peer, “that guy’s job, I could Google for like 2 months and totally do all he does.”

        Yeah, he wasn’t my manager for long.

  • Ephera@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    11 days ago

    Honestly, it’s ridiculous to me, how much bullshit you can get peddled, if you’re ready to eat it. Like, absolutely fuck the guy for being proud of firing his workforce, but I cannot blame him for believing the bullshit. At this point, you can readily find scientific studies claiming that AI surpasses humans, and if you look into them, they’re just using a bad test setup. Because well, guess what gets you into the news. It’s certainly not “AI is only reliably applicable for certain niche use-cases and needs guidance from someone with real intelligence”.

    • Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      11 days ago

      This is the sort of attitude I’d expect from people who constantly fall for bullshit.

      Where is the responsibility?

    • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      11 days ago

      but I cannot blame him for believing the bullshit.

      I can. Managers are supposed to have at least a basic understanding of the thing they’re in charge of. If the manager just follows online hype, they’re no better than AI.

    • ramble81@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      11 days ago

      I just wish I had lower standards and was willing to take advantage of people like this. I’d be rich.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 days ago

        The important thing about lowering your standards is that you need to keep your skepticism otherwise you’re going to end up firing your entire workforce and then replacing them with non-functional AI.

    • skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 days ago

      they’re just using a bad test setup

      On a meta level, it is pretty funny to think about. “Software that was trained to know something, can recite that knowledge back.”

      I’ve heard of these mystical paper tomes with knowledge in them, flip to the right page, and it will show you how to perform rocket surgery. It knows! It must be intelligent! What amazing times we live in!

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 days ago

      Remember the dot com bust? Well, so do these people. They’re not stupid.

      Missing out on the AI revolution can mean the death of your business and the possible rewards are astronomical. These guys are well aware of the risks. They’re aiming to be the 1% that comes out on top after the storm is past.

      Also this: Imagine you’re a CEO and the board confronts you, “How are you integrating AI into our business model?” You better have an answer or you’re fired in favor of a new CEO who will engage with AI.

      • Cyrus Draegur@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 days ago

        as amusing as the irony would be, it’s clearly too clean, sharp, organized, and consistent to be AI.

  • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    12 days ago

    As much as I want to believe this, they didn’t even link to the referenced Reddit post.

    0/10 - Gave me hope and dashed it, -1/10 with rice

  • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    11 days ago

    Fancy being so completely confident that you didn’t even test the AI before firing your entire human workforce.

    What’s a prat

  • w3dd1e@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    11 days ago

    This is sort of what I have been saying.

    It’s not that AI is capable of taking jobs yet, but if corporate management doesn’t understand that, it really doesn’t matter. They’ll fire most of the team and tell the remaining few people to make it work.

  • mysticpickle@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    11 days ago

    That website is cancer AF. Did they replace the entire staff at techgig with AI or something?