Sub.club thinks premium feeds could also serve other use cases, like supporting helpful bots or generating funds to help maintain a community’s Mastodon server, for instance.

  • FrostyTrichs@walledgarden.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I saw, I was just venting frustration at that specific viewpoint.

    It’s annoying that the same tired tactics are being applied to every corner of the internet.

    • Chozo@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I mean, how else do you expect things to work? Internet platforms aren’t free to operate. Isn’t paying creators directly supposed to be the ideal solution, instead of infesting pages with ads?

      • Handles@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        You’re already free to support developers and instance owners financially if they’ve set up either Patreon, OpenCollective or LiberaPay 🤷 That’s money going where it’s needed.

        If I understand SubClub correctly, it’s monetisation on a user level, which in the past has only really given us influencers. I rather enjoy not having that kind of bullshit on the fediverse.

        • Chozo@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          I’m not sure what the difference between SubClub or Patreon is supposed to be. Other than SubClub takes a smaller cut.