Not bring who in? What’s the deciding factor, precogs evaluating if someone does crime in the future? Not bring people who are born there and already stuck in lower classes. The problems don’t care about immigration, it’s the bourgeoisie waging class warfare.
So you are moving to a new street, but suddenly it’s not allowed because someone else maybe did something. You don’t know why, what, who, but your rights have been lessened. That’s how
There’s plenty of houses. Street or city or country, it doesn’t matter. There’s no valid reason to prevent innocent individuals from choosing any of them. Sounds like a right, why wouldn’t it be
Canadians cant even find a house anymore, much less buy one. The UK is paving the country side. House supply is down, they literally cant build quick enough to handle the influx.
I think you and I have fundementally different ideas about immigration and what a country is.
Well lots of countries have immigration requirements or points based systems. So it is obvious that countries already use means to choose which immigrants it wants.
This just needs expansion. You look at immigrants or children of immigrants that commit more crime than locals or contribute less than locals and you don’t bring them in. Because bringing them in makes the country worse.
It’s obviously an average but that is all immigration requirements are.
Not bring who in? What’s the deciding factor, precogs evaluating if someone does crime in the future? Not bring people who are born there and already stuck in lower classes. The problems don’t care about immigration, it’s the bourgeoisie waging class warfare.
Just let less immigrants in. No need for a pre-cog.
All those African colonies that France ruled for centuries; immigrants from those countries should be denied, just because they are
Blackimmigrants?Not becayse theyre black, but because theres simply too many immigrants. A country can only handle so much.
It’s not their fault, why punish so
How is it a punishment?
So you are moving to a new street, but suddenly it’s not allowed because someone else maybe did something. You don’t know why, what, who, but your rights have been lessened. That’s how
Its not a right. Its not “a new street”, its a country.
And to continue your metaphor, theres literally not enough houses on the street.
There’s plenty of houses. Street or city or country, it doesn’t matter. There’s no valid reason to prevent innocent individuals from choosing any of them. Sounds like a right, why wouldn’t it be
Canadians cant even find a house anymore, much less buy one. The UK is paving the country side. House supply is down, they literally cant build quick enough to handle the influx.
I think you and I have fundementally different ideas about immigration and what a country is.
Yes. I don’t see it as the root cause for issues which exist regardless of it
Well lots of countries have immigration requirements or points based systems. So it is obvious that countries already use means to choose which immigrants it wants.
This just needs expansion. You look at immigrants or children of immigrants that commit more crime than locals or contribute less than locals and you don’t bring them in. Because bringing them in makes the country worse.
It’s obviously an average but that is all immigration requirements are.
That doesn’t make sense, a new immigrant is in no way responsible for someone else’s crime
Why don’t they just let anyone in they? Why have rules on which people are allowed to immigrate and which aren’t?
Good idea