• Korkki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    27
    ·
    4 months ago

    tbh, a word being a slur depends on the use case. No word in isolation definitely is or is not a slur.

    • hikaru755@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 months ago

      Isn’t that the difference between a slur and an insult, that a slur is offensive in itself against a certain group of people*, while an insult depends on context?

      *Unless used by people from that group itself

    • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      The scientific definition of your gender identity matching the one you were assigned at birth is not, has never been, and never will be a slur.

      Please stop it with the disingenuous devil’s advocate act.

      • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        Just because a word is a scientific definition doesn’t mean it can’t become a slur. It’s happened many times, retard, negro, and a lesser extent dumb, lame, insane. There’s also illegal aliens, and homeless which are/becoming discouraged.

        • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Just because a word is a scientific definition doesn’t mean it can’t become a slur. It’s happened many times

          Yes, but every time because people used the word pejoratively. Pointing out that someone is cis isn’t an insult or otherwise pejorative and there’s nobody who’s trying to insult people who aren’t by calling them cis either.

          Transphobes are calling it a slur because they don’t like how acknowledging that you can be cis implies acknowledging that others aren’t. It’s just the typical bully playing the victim dance that bigots always do when people question their bigotry in even the most benign ways.

          There’s also illegal aliens

          Nope, that was always a slur designed for othering all immigrants by making the undocumented ones sound inherently criminal and frightening, and then conflating all immigration with that imaginary bogeyman.

          • Dasus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            This.

            It’s the “white lives matter” of trans conversation.

            Let’s see if the OP of this thread can answer me as I asked what “other phrases” he would suggest to replace “cisgender” which would actually convey the same meaning.

        • AltheaHunter@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          4 months ago

          Notice how none of your examples describe the privileged majority the way “cis” does? Give us a slur that includes 98% of the population and you might have a valid point.

    • andros_rex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      In context, no one is harassed/discriminated against/barred from housing/barred from employment/barred from accessing medical care because they are cis. There is no world in which a cis person is walking down the street, hears “hey cisgender!” and gets the shit beaten out of them.