You “summon” spirits, aka dead people. Since they’re alive, they can’t be summoned. They should instead be invited. That’s my guess.
Is all cirque du soleil levels of mental gymnastics and logical jumps to conclusions.
Alto notice, “my person” for they think legally they’re different from their legal ID. And the idea that they must only respond to a crime charges if there’s a person injured. As they have weird beliefs of how private property and crimes against property work, due to their weird misconception of legality.
That’s what I’ve noticed the most about these Sovereign Shitizens - they think legalese is just spinning words and they can just identify their legal status based on their own definitions thereof. They all lack one basic understanding of sovereignty - enforcement and self-defense. If you truly are sovereign prove it. Repel the invasion of our military and you will have earned your sovereignty.
There’s one other piece besides defending yourself. Building a collation of entities that acknowledge your sovereignty. Guess their probability of that happening.
Not that any of it makes sense, but what is the alive vs dead part about? What is their “logic” as to why there is any difference?
You “summon” spirits, aka dead people. Since they’re alive, they can’t be summoned. They should instead be invited. That’s my guess.
Is all cirque du soleil levels of mental gymnastics and logical jumps to conclusions.
Alto notice, “my person” for they think legally they’re different from their legal ID. And the idea that they must only respond to a crime charges if there’s a person injured. As they have weird beliefs of how private property and crimes against property work, due to their weird misconception of legality.
Wow, instead of being “three bricks short of a load” these people are like a few pallets short.
I’ve seen like 3 or 4 of these posts recently on here and IMO they’re more odd than all the QAnon posts.
Those two Venn diagrams are nearly a circle.
True, maybe because QAnon has been “normalized” since it has been in the news for years now, but these people just seem so much more bizarre to me.
Pffft. Lol. That’s probably it. It’s mind-blowing that people like this exist. Such stupidity.
That’s what I’ve noticed the most about these Sovereign Shitizens - they think legalese is just spinning words and they can just identify their legal status based on their own definitions thereof. They all lack one basic understanding of sovereignty - enforcement and self-defense. If you truly are sovereign prove it. Repel the invasion of our military and you will have earned your sovereignty.
They’re convinced that legalese is a magical language and if they say the right words in the right way, they’ll become immune to the law.
They remind me of Cargo Cults.
There’s one other piece besides defending yourself. Building a collation of entities that acknowledge your sovereignty. Guess their probability of that happening.
Uh they would just all get together like a bunch of Jerry’s and shake each other’s hands “oh YOU agree sovereign” “no you are sovereign”
Me and the squad endorsing each other’s LinkedIn skills