A car stopped in front of their home – the same one they’d had for the past 30 years
So, he arrived in the car they’ve had since he disappeared…
The car allegedly raced off before anyone had a chance to question the driver,
… and then someone stole it???
Edit: Ohhhh, it’s the same home they had when he disappeared. 🤦
That’s the point.
Let’s briefly set aside the fact that she was 12.
He was convicted of raping another person… period. That alone should disqualify him from representing his country at the Olympics.
Now back to your regular scheduled world wide publicity for Steven van de Velde, who repeatedly raped a 12 year old girl.
It’s right there in the teaser on on this page.
There’s absolutely nothing wrong with reporting the facts that you do have when you have them and are confident of your sources.
Acknowledging remaining open questions that you don’t have answers to yet, is a bonus.
A perfect example of reporting before the fog of war clears would be reporting completely erroneous information as factual. So unless you’re suggesting that a Ukrainian fighter jet did NOT in fact strike a target inside Russia, then this isn’t the “perfect example” you’re looking for.
Males, yeah, that’s how we high five.
No, we don’t.
Females I go waaaaaay lighter on. Like a fist bump with your palm.
And the intended recipients are all psychic and can tell that your delivery will be different than every other drunk high-fiver they’ve previously encountered. Right?
IANAL, but I feel like if the heirs to an estate cared enough about the deceased’s Steam account enough to get the court involved, Steam wouldn’t have a leg to stand on. But that’s probably what it would take to get them to do the right thing.
Didn’t you read it? They said they would dry fast… and drink. Duh. /s
failed to apologise for or denounce
Anybody can denounce another person’s shitty opinions.
… with frickin laser beams attached to their heads!
And even if his statement were correct, he’s got the cause and effect completely backwards.
FYI. The quantity of bees in a hive has more to do with their ability to find good food sources nearby, and the suitability of the place they’ve made their home, and nothing to do with their temperament. That size hive would not be considered particularly remarkable in an apiary. A “swarm” of bees is actually just a bunch of bees that split off from a successful hive and are looking for a new home and are typically very docile. Since this colony had a home (these people’s house), it was technical not a “swarm.”
It’s not that uncommon. When a beehive is doing really well, it’ll “split”, meaning they’ll raise a second queen and the new queen will leave and half of the colony will go with her to establish a new hive somewhere. This is called swarming, and it’s the their version of reproduction. (Tangent: Contrary to popular belief, honey bee swarms are usually very docile since they don’t yet have a home to defend.) Once they find a suitable location to settle, they’ll move in. Without humans building things, a suitable location would usually be something like an old hollowed out tree. But humans build great beehive homes. Old houses with small openings between siding panels that allow bees into the walls are a common favorite.
So, 14 misspelled variations + 1 correct spelling variation = 15 total spelling variations.
“You mean that series of tubes Ted Stephens would rant about? Pssh. We don’t have time for that. 🙄”
Go to the article and jump down to point #4. That’s the central point and something your response doesn’t address at all.
US: “Stop blowing up Russian oil refineries.”
Ukraine: “Then fucking help us, for christ sake!”
SCIENTISTS CAN’T EXPLAIN BrundleFly2077’s hyperbolic discourse