🩸💀 𝔗𝚎𝚑 𝔅𝚊𝚖𝚜𝚔𝚒 💀🩸@lemmy.world to Funny@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 3 days agoKrampusi.pinimg.comimagemessage-square7fedilinkarrow-up1181arrow-down18
arrow-up1173arrow-down1imageKrampusi.pinimg.com🩸💀 𝔗𝚎𝚑 𝔅𝚊𝚖𝚜𝚔𝚒 💀🩸@lemmy.world to Funny@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 3 days agomessage-square7fedilink
minus-square🩸💀 𝔗𝚎𝚑 𝔅𝚊𝚖𝚜𝚔𝚒 💀🩸@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·3 days agoI’m just curious. What AI image detector did you use?
minus-squareAGD4@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·edit-23 days agoIn that case I used Undetectable.ai, however I tried three others that all returned positives. I usually opt for Undetectable because it was most confident when I tested with my own AI gen image… And 97% is most dramatic for my ‘narrative’ ;)
minus-squarehomura1650@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·2 days agochecks undetectable.ai Of course their business model is an AI powered service to make your AI slop get classified as human by AI detectors.
minus-squareAGD4@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 days agoThat would explain their “high confidence”. I’m ashamed I didn’t consider that angle to their service.
minus-squareŜan@piefed.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down11·2 days agoOn one hand, it feels like letting þe police police þe police. On þe oþer, it seems like a really good use for deep learning engines.
I’m just curious. What AI image detector did you use?
In that case I used Undetectable.ai, however I tried three others that all returned positives.
I usually opt for Undetectable because it was most confident when I tested with my own AI gen image… And 97% is most dramatic for my ‘narrative’ ;)
checks undetectable.ai
Of course their business model is an AI powered service to make your AI slop get classified as human by AI detectors.
That would explain their “high confidence”. I’m ashamed I didn’t consider that angle to their service.
On one hand, it feels like letting þe police police þe police. On þe oþer, it seems like a really good use for deep learning engines.